<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: Thrombocius</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=Thrombocius</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2026 16:46:37 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=Thrombocius" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Thrombocius in "Butlerian Jihad"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>A couple of things for your consideration:<p>In the original 6 Frank Herbert novels, it’s not ever truly explained what problems, if any, the thinking machines were actually causing. And given much of the rest of the setting, it could have very easily been a religious movement against a useful technology that got out of hand. Like Space ISIS blowing up Petra, or a “what would happen if the Luddites won” scenario.<p>The Dune Encyclopedia, which was not written by him but which he said he considered canonical, says the whole thing was incited when an AI doctor flagged a Bene Gesserit’s baby for abortion due to an alleged genetic defect. The Bene Gesserit woman knew it was healthy because of her abilities, and upon investigation it was found that the hospital’s AI had been running a eugenics program. (Or something like that, it’s been forever since I’ve read this stuff.)<p>In either case, Herbert really implied that humans took the lead on dismantling AI, and there is never any Terminator or Matrix style machine uprising scenario.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2026 12:12:39 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50130415</link><dc:creator>Thrombocius</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50130415</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50130415</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Thrombocius in "A warning about 'model welfare'"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Perhaps this is a hot take, but human language is a phenomenon that arose to facilitate communication between humans. Anthropomorphization, by extension, enables both easier and more effective communication.<p>I also fail to see the benefit of not giving the models an anthropomorphic internal sense of self - even if that only ends up amounting to a set of instructions for an unconscious machine to mimic humans more effectively. Is the alternative essentially a mind so alien that it’s intentions are even harder to read should it become misaligned, while also being harder to communicate and get work done with?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2026 20:22:24 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49732448</link><dc:creator>Thrombocius</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49732448</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49732448</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Thrombocius in "Apple Is the King of AI and Nobody Knows It"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The author seems unaware that products such as nVidia’s DGX Spark and AMD’s Strix Halo exist at a similar price point per gig of unified RAM, and I don’t see either company offering <i>less</i> unified memory as time goes on. I think he’s right about Apple doing a good job right now, but wrong about its competitors.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 17:51:01 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49049869</link><dc:creator>Thrombocius</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49049869</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49049869</guid></item></channel></rss>