> By the time the "free" electricity has paid for the installation, you'll need to replace it.

Since you won't need to replace it, I'd say that this whole thing couldn't work out better: the panels are literally just generating electricity for free! And that's not even taking into account that 30yo panels generate more than "only half the power" (the study I linked measured ~80%).

Imagine someone offered to give you their 30 year old panels and install them on your property for free. Unless every eligible surface is already taken up by more efficient solar panels, who would say no?

Are you sure about that? https://www.chemistryworld.com/news/30-year-old-solar-panels...

All the results I've seen indicate that solar panels will keep producing electricity long after those 30 years, just at a reduced rate (but seemingly still >50%).

> Companies can’t force anyone to work for them. If the pay gets too low, people leave for other companies or jobs.

In an ideal world, sure! But in the real world, there are many sources of friction that - when added together - keep people tied to a job, even if they feel the pay is too low.

Just because this has been normalized doesn't mean it's not evil. If a healthcare company introduces processes that deny people life-saving interventions just to funnel more money to their shareholders, that company and its leadership are thoroughly evil.

I'd also like to add that I often pay more for things than I could get away with. I try to prefer locally owned businesses when possible, and if they have fair prices and give me good advice I often pay a bit extra (essentially a "tip" for the business) to support them.

GOTO is also pretty intuitive.

Is there a chance that something similar happened in Canada?

But I'd also like to push back on the "10,000 different names" - the overwhelming majority of those names are merely variations of the value they assign, so using any class teaches you dozens to hundreds of those 10,000 names. So realistically, the comparison is closer to "1,000 project-specific and potentially inconsistent names" vs. "1,000 consistent names valid in any project using TW".

Just look at how utterly evil and despicable the rich and powerful have been acting over the last years. Do you really think that people who are investing in shock collars to prepare for societal breakdown scenarios would give the non-rich masses a single red dime?

"Simplicity" isn't a relevant factor.