At the same time, personally I find prioritizing quality over quantity of output to be a better personal strategy. Ten partially buggy features really aren't as good as three quality ones.

[1] - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GendBuntu?useskin=vector

A couple of months ago I needed to renew the certificate because it expired, and I ran into the same issue as the author here - verification failed, and they refused to accept any documentation I would give them. Very frustrating experience, especially since there no human support available at all, for a product I was willing to pay and use!

We ended up getting our certificate sourced from https://signpath.org and have been grateful to them ever since.

Opus alone did a good job of identifying security issues in my software, as it did with Firefox [1] and Linux [2]. A next-generation frontier model being able to find even more issues sounds believable.

That said, this is script kiddies vs sql injections all over again. Everyone will need to get their basic security up on the new level and it will become the new normal. And, given how intelligence agencies are sitting on a ton of zero-days already, this will actually help the general public by levelling out the playing field once again.

1 - https://www.anthropic.com/news/mozilla-firefox-security 2 - https://neuronad.com/ai-news/claude-code-unearthed-a-23-year...

Thanks to chain of thought, actually having the LLM be explicit in its output allows it to have more quality.