<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: Valakas_</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=Valakas_</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2026 03:01:58 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=Valakas_" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Valakas_ in "Oceans hit highest temperature on record"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Caveman summary. We evolved for:<p>- Bad guy with stick<p>- Immediate danger<p>- Things that make caveman angry<p>- Sudden changes<p>Climate change is:<p>- No bad guy (no bad man to protect from)<p>- No immediate danger (no tiger here now)<p>- No moral outrage (strange numbers go up)<p>- Very slow (everything seems same)</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2026 11:55:23 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49432376</link><dc:creator>Valakas_</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49432376</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49432376</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Valakas_ in "Oceans hit highest temperature on record"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>But in 50 years we'll defo have technology to remove that CO2.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2026 11:38:21 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49432214</link><dc:creator>Valakas_</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49432214</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49432214</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Valakas_ in "Oceans hit highest temperature on record"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p><a href="https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/co-emissions-per-capita" rel="nofollow">https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/co-emissions-per-capita</a><p>"Exploding" while the US still emits 50% more than China and has been emitting more than double and triple before recent years.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2026 11:34:55 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49432171</link><dc:creator>Valakas_</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49432171</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49432171</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Valakas_ in "Oceans hit highest temperature on record"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The BBC one hurts my brain to watch. Incoherent mess of a script. The DW one on the other hand is pretty good. Watch the first 5 minutes of each and you'll see the difference. Thanks for sharing.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2026 11:32:45 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49432148</link><dc:creator>Valakas_</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49432148</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49432148</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Valakas_ in "I'm becoming AI-blind"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I know what you mean. The sentence appears to makes sense, it is correct grammatically, but lacks substance. It's the equivalent of AI image generated stuff where at first glance the image looks fine, but it hurts your brain. Then the more you look the more you see nothing makes sense in it, and it just gives the appearance that it does.<p>It's definitely worse that slop, because it really hurts your brain. You read it over and over, and feel like you're supposed to understand the sentence, it's coherent, eloquent even, but by the end of it, you don't know what the f it was about.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2026 11:10:09 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49431892</link><dc:creator>Valakas_</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49431892</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49431892</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Valakas_ in "Andreessen Horowitz is investing billions into a bleak future"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>AFAIK only psychopathy is purely genetic. The rest i believe are susceptible (although very resistant) to treatment as they are only partially genetic, and partially environmental (suffered abuse, neglect).<p>Some people are commenting people would fake/dupe the testers. Sure, some would be able to. But many (i'd wager the vast majority) wouldn't. People don't realise how difficult it actually is to fake being normal. The only reason people with cluster B seem to dupe so many is because we live in a day and age where they are able to jump from relationship to relationship and cut ties with the people they've mistreated or "found them out".</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2026 07:49:22 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49430386</link><dc:creator>Valakas_</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49430386</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49430386</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Valakas_ in "Andreessen Horowitz is investing billions into a bleak future"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>For me it's insane, how in this day and age, we don't conduct DSM-V / ICD tests (interviews) that screen for Cluster B personality disorders <i>on everyone</i>, and bar, at least those with anti-social PD, psychopathy, or extreme forms of narcissism, to work in positions of influence or power over others.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2026 10:47:35 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49417900</link><dc:creator>Valakas_</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49417900</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49417900</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Valakas_ in "Ask HN: Does anyone else feel like nothing matters anymore?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Sometimes. Have you ever played a single player game where there are achievements, goals, strategies to be had (...). You can often get addicted (eg Factorio) trying to optimize, make the best of your limited resources.<p>But then you realise you're spending too much time on it. And you just want to see the ending. So you enter the cheat codes to make it easy. You blast through everything, you get to the last levels and still easy. And things start feeling meaningless and pointless, and in fact, probably because of that, you quickly lose interest in the game completely.<p>It now feels like we're in the end game.<p>For hundreds of thousands of years we struggled with finding food, be it foraging or hunting, both of which requiring a lot of skill, dealing with several difficult diseases throughout adulthood, droughts, finding new places to stay for the night, for food.<p>And now... all we do is sit 8h per day in front of a screen, and everything else is taken care of. We can even have sex without having babies and a huge lifelong commitement. A first! The pleasures that it unlocks. We have food from all over the world at our fingertips. A feast no hunter-gatherer tribe would ever in their wildest dreams could even conceive of. We have cameras streaming animals from all over the world, lions killing impalas recorded being uploaded for the pleasure of people who watch it on youtube, or simply fledgling birds and their progress, we monitor the weather on all of Earth. We convert sunlight into thunder energy, and make thinking machines from rock. Truly, feels like the last levels of a game where we have the cheat codes.<p>A fish will rarely ask himself "what is water?". It just is. That's just how it is. So we also tend not to realise the ridiculousness of the world we live in because we have been born in it. Even more so younger generations. Some of us have seen the world rapidly changing at an increasingly faster pace. This all we have today is NOT normal. We live in the equivalent of a fraction of the blink of an eye to human existence.<p>Of course, we stress. A lot. Our mental health has never been worse. But this is feels like the end game. Our 'progressivism' and 'Libertarianism' led us to change a lot without thinking of the consequences. And here we are, reaching the finish line, unprepared. Our systems, laws, mental stability have no have time to adapt.<p>And it's scary. I hope we can pull it through.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2026 06:09:08 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49341904</link><dc:creator>Valakas_</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49341904</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49341904</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Valakas_ in "AI is removing the middle class of software engineering?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>"This blog post illustrates the importance of NEVER outsourcing your critical thinking or outsourcing decision-making to an LLM."<p>This is a sentence that if written just 5 years ago would result in you being seen as crazy. "LLM capable of any sort of critical thinking? Haha. Not in 50 years."<p>It never ceases to amaze me how people are stuck in the here in the now and just accept the new reality as if it had always been this way, and will continue being this way in the foreseeable future.<p>This is the worst LLMs will ever be. Not outsourcing critical thinking to LLM will be seen as a liability in the not so distant future. Just a year or two ago almost no one even took LLM seriously for coding. Now the status quo has moved for also critical thinking, and we hear comments like this. LLM's chances of making a mistake will be orders of magnitude lowers than humans. Slowly learn to let the wheel go. AI will be much better at holding and controlling it.<p>"We should NEVER outsource number crunching to calculators. They are not 100% reliable and we can make mistakes when inputting the data." Someone in 1920's probably. I know it's a metaphor, and like all metaphors can't be compared 1-1. But it's to make a point how it illustrates my argument above.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2026 05:55:13 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49282198</link><dc:creator>Valakas_</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49282198</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49282198</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Valakas_ in "“Code was never the hard part” is an insult to all programmers"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>This is the correct answer. Of all the engineering fields, SWE is by far the one with highest salary compared to how difficult it is. SWE lucked out on the fact that we have been going through a technological revolution, and naturally the demand for the people who work in this field is huge. Hence the pay. In my university SWE bachelors + masters degree has been seen as the easiest one as far as i can remember. Mechanical, bio, aerospace and electrical as the most difficult.<p>It's always been funny to see the arrogance of some SWE who think that since they're the highest paid, they are also the most difficult and most important jobs, while it has zero to do with either of these two. Just luck of supply/demand. Otherwise mathematicians and physics would be sitting at the top with the highest paid careers and they... are not even close to that.<p>For this reason I don't really feel sorry for AI replacing programmers/SWE, at least the ones that were arrogant enough to think in the way i explained.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2026 06:59:28 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49240255</link><dc:creator>Valakas_</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49240255</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49240255</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Valakas_ in "Discovery Loop"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>1. Develop AGI<p>2-14. ???</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 10:28:22 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49194845</link><dc:creator>Valakas_</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49194845</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49194845</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Valakas_ in "Ten advances in mathematics and theoretical computer science"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I have news for you. All humans do is also filling gaps with combinations of known facts and results - in new ways. "Everything is a Remix" is a good watch on youtube that explains this. Picasso might look like he has an invented personal style, but his style is a combination of different little details he took from others and mixed in a new way. Mozart the same. No music artist could ever create music in a vacuum. Everyone, for every art and science, the same. I know many are trying to cling to the last hope of human specialness, that "thing" that AI can never get to.<p>It's a convex hull of information that is reflective and spans outside of itself and combines in a new way, when you shine two known rays of light together from the inside.<p>Now it gets better. AI can be orders of magnitude more creative than any human could ever hope for, because his convex hull of information is orders of magnitude larger, and the possibilities for new combinations are equally larger.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2026 05:56:06 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49164762</link><dc:creator>Valakas_</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49164762</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49164762</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Valakas_ in "LLMs reward expertise"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>They reward expertise but not for long. Let's not kid ourselves into coping for a little longer.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2026 05:49:56 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49164734</link><dc:creator>Valakas_</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49164734</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49164734</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Valakas_ in "Karpathy’s Pelican"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>That's a nice metaphor for your mother, i like it. I would just touch on one small part, which is that it has more than our judgement though. It has access to laws of physics, to formulas, to all our current scientific knowledge which we have shown to be correct by interacting with the physical world. It can create an (incomplete) model of the world based on verified theories already. Through deduction and reasoning alone it can get pretty far. After all, there's many scientific theories we created long in advance before we actually proved them to be correct through interaction with the physical world. So even before they were proved to be correct, they were already correct. Same can be applied to what LLM can infer through reasoning alone.<p>Anyway, just a small point which probably still wouldn't change the nice metaphor your made.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 06:06:17 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49151771</link><dc:creator>Valakas_</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49151771</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49151771</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Valakas_ in "Our position on open-weights models"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It's correct but defenders also choose <i>where</i> that happens. 100% of the time on the locations and conditions that the defenders choose / allow. As a defender i need to be right 100% of the time, sure, but i can make it so that the things i have to be right about are very well known to me, unknown to others, maybe even extremely unlikely to be to known by others, difficult to get to know, (...). So that saying is true but over simplifies the situation. I know monkey brain likes simple phrase. But monkey not live in savannah anymore. Need to adapt and open mind to complex.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2026 05:57:23 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49079939</link><dc:creator>Valakas_</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49079939</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49079939</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Valakas_ in "Sleep regularity is a stronger predictor of mortality risk than sleep duration (2023)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>And what is the root cause of your magnesium deficiency? How come you're not getting enough of it from food?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 06:57:41 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48931184</link><dc:creator>Valakas_</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48931184</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48931184</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Valakas_ in "Sleep regularity is a stronger predictor of mortality risk than sleep duration (2023)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>But how come you have magnesium deficiency in the first place, what are you not eating? People who need magnesium supplements still absorb magnesium, so the problem isn't absorption must be consumption.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 06:57:13 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48931179</link><dc:creator>Valakas_</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48931179</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48931179</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Valakas_ in "Grok 4.5"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I trust Grok as much as any other AI. What exactly is the history i should be concerned about?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 11:07:31 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48843961</link><dc:creator>Valakas_</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48843961</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48843961</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Valakas_ in "Apple raises prices of MacBooks, iPads"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>That perspective is misleading. By that logic someone in 1960 would have to pay $100k to have a vacuum computer that is equivalent to a random calculator today. So then any price below $100k is ok for a calculator and we shouldn't complain :).</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2026 08:36:31 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48716450</link><dc:creator>Valakas_</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48716450</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48716450</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Valakas_ in "Humanity isn't ready for the coming intelligence explosion"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>"(...) it's going to effectively be a new human era..."<p>We never like it when we realize the universe doesn't circle around us.<p>At first we got mad to discover the Earth wasn't the center of the Solar system.<p>Then we got mad that the solar system wasn't even unique.<p>And now we're still clinging to the idea that humans always will be the most intelligent species or the only ones gifted with "creativity".<p>And soon we might also come to realize it might not be a new human era, but the end of it (if we're not careful).</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2026 11:10:51 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48553422</link><dc:creator>Valakas_</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48553422</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48553422</guid></item></channel></rss>