It's crazy that the left and green parties are against cheap, sustainable and clean energy for the masses.

I find this is a key feature. If a file is edited, git shows it as dirty, and I get to decide if I discard of commit the change. No extra steps required.

> By the time Homebrew and a couple of tools have run on a new Mac, files like ~/.zprofile and ~/.gitconfig already exist.

I don't get why you'd manually provision those files instead of just putting them in dotfiles.

---

Personally, I found that most tools in this space tried to do too much or were too complex. I previously wrote a minimal one in Rust, but eventually re-wrote it into less than 200 lines of shell, which works pretty much anywhere, without having to install anything at all, and is part of the dotfiles repository itself:

https://git.sr.ht/~whynothugo/dotfiles/tree/ac97cb196f02cafa...

For this particular case, do they really spoof the caller ID on an (expensive) international phone call, or do they actually just re-route via a local phone number?

Example of a shop which describes 5g as a "light dose": https://www.sirius.nl/atlantis/

> Python: both add decorators to function

If two branches add a decorator into the same function, I definitely want to keep both, but the _order_ is of great importance.

But in fact, this makes me think that automated semantic resolution can have a lot of issues. E.g:, say two branches add the following two lines separately. Merging them requires a human considering the order of operations and how the affect the result:

    title = title.replace("_", " ")
    title = title.to_title_case()

I'm sure there's a sum of compliance reasons why this is not allowed, but it doesn't make any sense at all.

I'd really prefer to see a model where a 'community' repository contains user submitted packages which have at least one Trusted User review the package before it's merged in. This doesn't just prevent malware, but also common mistakes in general.

This naming is atrocious: the verb is "allow", but this actually _displays_ a list of those unapproved? Was --show-blocked too obvious?

The same is true in Argentina. And in school kids play almost every recess too.

A lot of very prominent player from Argentina had this kind of humble beginning too.

The reply with be delayed by days or weeks, but the UI indicated that it had been properly saved.

Sandboxing a GUI is typically more operational overhead than sandboxing a cli (mounting compositor sockets, GPU access, etc).

I find it very easy to reason about: a single process maps to a single recurring task.

It can track last execution into a file, yielding durable schedules when the host is offline.