<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: Worf</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=Worf</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 08:39:31 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=Worf" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Worf in "Ask HN: Can HN ban new accounts? or charge money?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Given how most forums, news forums where I live for example, are full of absolutely low-effort insults, troll posts, obvious propaganda or just well-intentioned idiots, I can't imagine the trash the mods here must encounter all the time. HN is very popular so it likely attracts a lot more shitposts than we see with showdead.<p>Yet, it's possible to create a new account and get un-shadow-banned after a few hours. Dunno if this speaks volumes about how great HN's mods are or if it just means that other forums a really lacking in moderation for one reason or another (like "we have shitposts but it drives up engagement").<p>The trouble is that HN is centralized, like most forums. So what if it stops working the way it does now? There are likely many forums like HN with good algorithms and mods, but we won't all move to the same one, we'll scatter around. There isn't even a competing HN; lobsters is for narrower subjects, reddit is trash, what else is there?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 18:29:15 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47952391</link><dc:creator>Worf</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47952391</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47952391</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Worf in "Your phone is about to stop being yours"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> Nowhere is their goal to allow users complete control of their device. Android was built as an open-OS for the mobile device industry, not end-users.<p>The fact that having root access is not the default supports that. Without root we're just "consumers" and that's how they see us. There's a lot of discussion about the security model of Android and how root is bad. But we've come to the point to argue that having root access is not only less secure but that we don't need root at all. A lot of replies, even on HN, are like:<p>> Why would you even need root access? What is it you're trying to accomplish?<p>That's a much bigger security smokescreen than the one in TFA. Sure, having root may be dangerous, especially if you don't know what you're doing, but it's still a choice. Having no phone or doing banking IRL or not downloading apps from the Play Store you haven't heard of before would also be more secure. But these 3 options don't align to the financial gain the consumers would bring to the providers. The consumers having no root, on the other hand, benefits the providers.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 22:28:46 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47941723</link><dc:creator>Worf</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47941723</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47941723</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Worf in "Your phone is about to stop being yours"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> It's a continual erosion of people's ability to use hardware _they own_ in ways _they want_ under the guise of 'security' - which to be fair google does fuck all to actually prevent malicious, scammy and misleading apps from appearing on their play store.<p>A lot of people don't seem to understand this and point out that Android is still more open and free than iOS, but iOS has never been about openness and freedom. People believed in Android, and in Google. Now they either see Google betraying them (once again) or only see the Android vs iOS comparison, forgetting about the implications about autonomy, agency and about the future of Android. Many people don't care which actors control their digital lives and what motivations they have. People should be made aware that Google is on their side and that they have shown many times that they have no honor.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 22:08:16 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47941532</link><dc:creator>Worf</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47941532</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47941532</guid></item></channel></rss>