- I start by using jj new to create a new change where I want to start working.
  - I open codex, and prompt it to do something.
  - Roughly every prompt, I will naturally check the cumulative diff using jj diff.
  - If I want to check the diff log of the working change, I'll use jj evolog.
  - If I want to check the diff from the previous prompt, I'll use jj diff -f xx/1, where xx is the short change ID for the working change, and 1 is how many prompts ago I want to look at the diff for (jj evolog can help with finding the change I'm interested in)
  - If I want to undo all or some of what a prompt did, I'll use jj restore -f xx/1, potentially with -i or a fileset.
  - When I've prompted / restored / made changes myself to the point where I am happy with a change, I'll usually ask codex to write a conventional commit message for . Codex will then use *git* to look at the diff in that commit (which has no commit message), and give it will usually give an appropriate commit message[1] (sometimes I'll tweak this if there are details I want to add or remove). I use jj ci (short for jj commit) to finish the change and add the commit message.
  - I'll then advance bookmarks as necessary with jj b m (short for jj bookmark move) and probably push.

[1] https://www.conventionalcommits.org/en/v1.0.0/

When you're interacting with agents, multiple prompts may reasonable culminate in a single commit. It may be useful to track or undo things between commits - at the prompt level. I personally have a workflow when I use Jujutsu (jj) for git already, and this slotted in very nicely to solve this problem. The auto-committing in jj makes it very easy and natural to compare diffs between prompts, and undo specific chunks or restore previous states without making a new commit every prompt. I only finish a commit, giving it a message and advancing the branch, once I've iteratively dialed in the changes I want.

I probably won't use this tool since I already have a flow that works for me, but maybe this will help people see why such a tool can be helpful.

Edit: fixed typo

I've found it very useful for storing geospatial data over time.

I get about 30 tok/s, which is far from blazing, but given the capability it has it is absolutely viable for accelerating my work.

The truth is, we have had AGI for years now. We even have artificial super intelligence - we have software systems that are more intelligent than any human. Some humans might have an extremely narrow subject that they are more intelligent than any AI system, but the people on that list are vanishing small.

AI hasn't met sci-fi expectations, and that's a marketing opportunity. That's all it is.