<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: _DadeMurphy</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=_DadeMurphy</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 21:21:24 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=_DadeMurphy" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[Extracting Multiple Bits per Request from Full-Blind SQL Injection Vulns]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="http://howto.hackallthethings.com/2016/07/extracting-multiple-bits-per-request.html">http://howto.hackallthethings.com/2016/07/extracting-multiple-bits-per-request.html</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12057533">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12057533</a></p>
<p>Points: 5</p>
<p># Comments: 1</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2016 18:09:06 +0000</pubDate><link>http://howto.hackallthethings.com/2016/07/extracting-multiple-bits-per-request.html</link><dc:creator>_DadeMurphy</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12057533</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12057533</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by _DadeMurphy in "The SSD Endurance Experiment: Two petabytes"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Where did you see that the 840 is still going error-free? It says that the 840 maxed out it's reallocated sectors at around 900TB and veered into a ditch right before the petabyte threshold.<p>It'd be interesting to run these same tests on enterprise grade drives as well.<p>Edit: You meant that the 840 Pro is still going, I see.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2014 22:28:46 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8702107</link><dc:creator>_DadeMurphy</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8702107</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8702107</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by _DadeMurphy in "The danger of using Gmail as storage"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I think he meant to say "A good reason to encrypt your archives", not just put a password on them. If you encrypt your archive, even a rar, gmail shouldn't be able to see the contents inside of it.<p>Another solution is to simply change executable names to .exe.backup or something similar, that way it'll register as a ".backup" extension for most systems and not be blocked simply by name (though this wouldn't necessarily defeat things that actually detect and block binary executables).</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2014 21:31:15 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8701773</link><dc:creator>_DadeMurphy</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8701773</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8701773</guid></item></channel></rss>