<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: _fe</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=_fe</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2026 04:54:15 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=_fe" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by _fe in "Rust in the kernel is no longer experimental"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>In-general it seems that Rust proponents want ease and modernity to replace the ability to do the same in C better, with more control and intent, and with better results.<p>Rust is less tight. That’s fine for an application, but the kernel is used by everyone who uses Linux.<p>Rustians disparage C because it doesn’t have Rust behavior.<p>Why must the kernel have Rust behavior?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2025 12:21:52 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46216920</link><dc:creator>_fe</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46216920</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46216920</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by _fe in "Rust in the kernel is no longer experimental"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> If rust didn’t provide value to the Linux kernel, there’s no way it would have made out of the experimental phase.<p>That’s “appeal to authority” fallacy.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2025 12:10:48 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46216827</link><dc:creator>_fe</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46216827</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46216827</guid></item></channel></rss>