If they aren't willing to read what I put effort into, why should I be expected to read the ill-conceived and verbose response? I really don't want to get into a match of my AI arguing with your AI, but that's what they've told me I should be doing...

The old "If you aren't paying for a product, you're the product." adage doesn't apply anymore when even if you're paying, you're _still_ being productized.

The real problem is increasing concentration of _everything_ into ever-fewer (viable) players.

Doctorow's book "Enshittification" goes into way more examples of this phenomenon (though I'm far less optimistic than he is about the ability to reverse this trend).

I think you’re just biased to think that starting must “naturally” begin with 1.

Zero is just a good a place to start and some people do start counting from zero.

Can anyone ELI5?

The other cases are more interesting, and pre-aggregation of all logs related to a correlation ID can be really helpful when debugging a specific incident, but it does seem like this proposal is the same basic trade-off around size and performance as with virtually any form of compression.

I honestly thought they’d be using ssh that way (single command at a time), though I’m still not sure to what security end.

How is logging into ssh (sshd) AS root more secure than using sudo? I honestly don’t even know how dangerous that is because I’ve always been told to never allow it. I see here thought goes into preventing that for a remote user, so I’m not talking about that aspect of security here.

Maybe it has to do with #3 in the sudo limitations — I certainly don’t see any benefits vis-a-vis #1.

I totally get that this is an experiment, but I suspect it is more vulnerable than using sudo, not less (the open socket proxy looks interestingly vulnerable to a man in the middle attack).

Having said all that, I did learn some tricks old tools are capable of, so kudos for showing me something new.

However, the paper says they’re not commonly taught, but jerk is taught in many high school (AP) Physics classes — we have to keep our balance by noticing the change in acceleration.

It's quite clear the small sample data was chosen intentionally to not cover them.

I have seen accessibility tools in Chrome lead to this kind of issue in the past with a dropdown menu -- to the point where it could be replicated with a miniscule amount of HTML. The particular bug I hit 2 years ago was in Chromium-Edge, but the symptoms and cause were very similar.

Grammarly almost certainly leans on some of the accessibility tools in Chrome. These tools are somewhat different in the various Chromium flavors (Edge, Brave, Chrome, etc.).

With the runaway inflation there, I get why the idea seems like a good one, especially at first glance. I know the realities of such a change are pretty complex and nuanced and that doesn't seem like this new president's strong-suit.

The recent John Oliver coverage of Milei has me far more concerned about the social and environmental destruction and instability his leadership is likely to cause.

I sincerely hope he governs far better than I think anyone has a right to expect, given how he campaigned.

It doesn't make any sense in a 2-body orbit (those are all conic sections).