The game came on a floppy disk; if you inserted it in the drive upside down (the Apple II only used one side of the medium) you found (unusually) that the game would load, but was rendered upside down.

It was fully playable. Non trivial given the way those games were written!!!

Every critique of AI assumes to some degree that contemporary implementations will not, or cannot, be improved upon.

Lemma: any statement about AI which uses the word "never" to preclude some feature from future realization is false.

Lemma: contemporary implementations have already improved; they're just unevenly distributed.

Here there be monsters, and we don't have any real way of evaluating risk; and the leverage provided by tools already available affords systemic and even existential risk in a way no one—least of all an industry committed to shareholder value—has had to navigate, let alone with a million backseat drivers each with their own substack and brand to build.

TRIGGER WARNINGS APPLY

The Rifters series, which has some spectacular images and conceits, is also author-insert misogynist sadism gratification-porn.

Didn't have to be that way. Shame that it was as IMO it renders the series and indeed Watts un-recommendable.

Every assertion of personal responsibility (sic) in the face of billion to trillion dollar industry spending is bad faith, zero exceptions.

British Petroleum invented the concept of personal climate footprint. That was bad faith and to put a point on it, evil.

Tech industry claims that engagement farming and addition manufacture should be opposed by "parenting" are even less credible.

I say this as someone with expertise in a domain they nominally targetted.

Very "cool" looking kit, but: missing basic features, unremarkable in those provided; serious issues rendering it fundamentally inappropriate for its nominal application.

I.e. the "self" is not the same as what it means to experience consciousness.

There are for example well characterized examples of memory disruption under the influence of various drugs (e.g. as used intentionally in anesthesia); and neurological conditions which produce various kinds of amnesia.

Do these conditions mean someone is not conscious? We have the luxury of asking people directly.

More unsettling edges yet include things like so-called "split brain" patients or people suffering form serious psychological conditions like so-called "multiple personalities." Psychology does get great mileage out pathology!

Quite objectively, the track record for management demonstrating bad faith and lying about this is deep and long.

and put a post-it between them with COMPUTONIUM???? written on it

Can we please keep it together for a modest number of decades longer please.

This is what I tell people (including non-programmers interested in vibe coding), the results you get are product of... process. Formal process.

From this naturally emerges the other thing I tell people: domain expertise (or at least, familiarity and or capacity for learning) is still determinate of outcome.

I don't touch the code. But I do push back on expedience, laziness, inconsistency, and all the other recurring unsolved problems of generated code... and continue to play whack-a-mole in pursuit of process that whacks the moles.

it is very non-helpful—or worse—to use this language, this way.

One might as well say "need neural plasticity" which is as much an analogy and equally misleading and counterproductive in shaping the right model of the system.

One might even call this pernicious, what it encourages is already a social problem; and it doesn't aid understanding, it confounds it.

Authenticity earned through proof of work: invest your neurons and time to demonstrate fealty! Context switch for me!

Buried lede: much of the time the person asking could do all the work suggested.

This is like LMGTFY but backwards, it shames the person whose time is being asked for.

Different problems are different. The problem of wealth concentration is not novel and it's been addressed many time.

Usually in ways the end poorly for those who believe themselves untouchable.