If a baby sleeps better, it cries less. If it cries less, it attracts fewer predators and helps both parents sleep better at night and have more energy. It also allows the mother to do things with her dominant hand if she is right-handed.

Given the left-handed cradling bias exists even with left-handers, it means there is something specific with left-handedness and infant rearing. A baby in the left hand and a tool (or weapon) in the right is biologically efficient.

Most studies take this from the perspective of evolutionary advantage of the individual. They should take it from the perspective of evolutionary advantage of the family, without which the baby does not survive.

If the bias confers evolutionary advantages, that is also important for the longer childhood humans have compared to primates, which supports our larger brains. Any differential here would have a feedback effect.

Wouldn't it be interesting if a key reason humans are the way we are is a mother's love ♥?

[1] https://sites.psu.edu/clarep/2024/04/12/the-left-cradling-bi...

It also allows right-handed mothers to do something with their dominant hand while cradling the baby in that position.

[1]: https://sites.psu.edu/clarep/2024/04/12/the-left-cradling-bi...

The government does raise children. It's called the public school system.

One of the things I've discovered in my long career of people being wrong about everything is how strong the team sports dynamic of social politics really is. I was high school friends with a writer for the Daily Show and the thing I realized is how humor and dismissal was a way of creating social superiority and evasion of legitimate arguments.

Right now, the world is changing greatly. Lots of people are retreating into a shell of humor in order to avoid it. Mass cognitive dissonance about the nature of reality. But reality and life goes on.

And I question why a 501c3 charity would need "field informants" and to launder money through shell corporations. Especially to leaders of these organizations who were (1) coordinating some of these rallies and (2) due to the materially dishonest treatment of the "fine people hoax" for years.

Is the SPLC an intelligence organization? Am I missing something?

There are things that are simply not pedagogically useful in the limited instructional period in school. There are things that are simply not appropriate during early childhood development.

People who abuse and manipulate language like this are exactly why more traditional instruction is desired in certain school districts. Postmodernism is wrong. There are actually things that are true without the miasma of an artificial (and exhausting) social construction of reality.

Kids can read whatever they and their parents want. Schools don't have to teach it.

The original person's implication that the "antagonism" towards the IRGC is novel to America is simply false.

They are a theocratic regime which is not supported by 80% of its population. Being gay is punishable by death. They employ surveillance from China to ensure hijabs are worn by women at all times. They ban access to the internet. Chants of "Death to America" are their government's routine greeting for 50 years. They place military equipment in schools and hospitals deliberately, viewing US compassion as a weakness. They recruit child soldiers and have them publicly stationed at military targets.

There is definitely "antagonism," but to act as if the Iranian people would not bomb their own government if they could... it's a bit much.

The question becomes: if you're traveling on a line, and you see the destination looks dark ahead of you, do you turn around or keep going?

Canada's notoriously polite deference led them to align with those powerful tech, marketing, and financial hubs in the US. A cheerleader on the sidelines. But everyone gets to pick. There's a lack of acknowledgement that there's even a choice; the dog that didn't bark one could say. But it's part and parcel of why modern Canada is the way it is.

And just think, those are the American areas most common to Canada.

There are places in America where those counterfactuals do not exist, where the necessities aren't locked behind counters, where community is thriving, and where the normality of civic life is an expectation.

I expect no honors for those parts of the country. If Canada didn't have an air of superiority to comfort itself with, it would have nothing at all.

It should be mentioned that "illegal" is a definitive word. There are definitely people not willing to follow the law, including political entities which are dependent on it. The moniker of privacy in this respect is a shield for illegality, because there is no reason that Medicaid data regarding SSNs should be shielded from the federal government.

To take this to its logical conclusion, Americans must concede that EU/UK systems of identity and social services are inherently immoral.

But a company that can't stand on its own isn't a success in my opinion. Similar things can be said about companies that continue to need round after round of funding without an IPO.

My comment is of the "(2018)" variety. Old news that didn't age well like the people jumping on the "Uber: why we switched to MySQL from Postgres" post. (How many people would choose that decision today?)

People tend to divorce the actual results of a lot of these companies from the gripes of the developers of the tech blogs.

The "micro" in microservice was a marketing term to distinguish it from the bad taste of particular SOA technology implementations in the 2000s. A similar type of activity as crypto being a "year 3000 technology."

The irony is it was the common state that "services" weren't part of a distributed monolith. Services which were too big were still separately deployable. When services became nothing but an HTTP interface over a database entity, that's when things became complicated via orchestration; orchestration previously done by a service... not done to a service.

It was when the "microservices considered harmful" articles started popping up that microservices had become a fad. Most of the HN early-startup energy will continue to do monoliths because of team communication reasons. And I predict that if any of those startups are successful, they will have need for separate services for engineering reasons. If anything, the historical faddishness of HN shows that hackers pick the new and novel because that's who they are, for better or worse.

Anyone who has ever developed in a Java codebase with "Service" and then "ServiceImpl"s everywhere can see the lineage of that model. Services were supposed to be the API, and the implementation provided in a separate process container. Microservices signalled a time where SOA without Java as a pre-requisite had been successful in large tech companies. They had reached the point of needing even more granular breakout and a reduction of reliance on Java. HTTP interfaces was an enabler of that. 2010s era microservices people never understood the basics, and many don't even know what they're criticizing.

This also mirrors the alignment that arises in tech companies between platform (very useful to be centralized) vs architecture. Platform technologies are useful as pure technology, and therefore horizontally distributable. Whereas big-a Architecture as a central committee died an ignominious death for good reason: product and business decisions require deep knowledge, and therefore architecture is simply a function a product team does.

I am old enough to remember when there were simply "services," and there was an understanding that a service was something a team or business function did, because it mirrored Conway's Law. The root of service is literally "serve." That there was a one-to-one correspondence between a software service and the team serving others was a given.

Microservices were a natural evolution of this. When growth happened, parts of those things improperly in a too-large service were pushed down so they could be used by multiple teams. But the idea of a hierarchy of concerns was always present in plain ol' SOA.