<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: achalxyz</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=achalxyz</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2026 21:24:08 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=achalxyz" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by achalxyz in "HackerRank open sourced its ATS. My resume scored 90/100. Oh wait 74. No – 88"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>If I know the truth value of p and I also know p=>q, then an LLM would be able to deduce the truth value of q - even if the statements aren’t exactly in this form. Generally, LLMs are good with logical inference.<p>But logical inference itself is limited. You still have to find out if p is true or not - the ground truth.<p>How do you find that? You would be able to define in the prompt that if resume has p, infer q and do this. But determining the truth value of p is something LLM cannot do.<p>It’s not a limitation of the LLM. It’s the limitation of logic itself. You take 10 humans and give them the resumes with the same rubrics as the LLM. You’ll get a similar range of scores because everyone would assign different values.<p>The issue is not in logical inference. It’s in determining the value of p, which takes much more than logic. And current LLMs are limited to being logical.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2026 15:32:05 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48720612</link><dc:creator>achalxyz</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48720612</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48720612</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[How Block is replacing middle management with an AI "world model"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://sequoiacap.com/article/from-hierarchy-to-intelligence/">https://sequoiacap.com/article/from-hierarchy-to-intelligence/</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47602617">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47602617</a></p>
<p>Points: 8</p>
<p># Comments: 7</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2026 15:59:07 +0000</pubDate><link>https://sequoiacap.com/article/from-hierarchy-to-intelligence/</link><dc:creator>achalxyz</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47602617</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47602617</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by achalxyz in "Using an 8K TV as a Monitor"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I have used a Samsung 43” 4k smart monitor with my mac mini for sometime as a replacement to multiple screens and it was a productive experience. However, I had to stop in 2-3 months as my eyes would get dry and itchy at the end of the day. Using such a large screen at such a short distance isn’t great for the eyes I think.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 31 Oct 2024 13:31:23 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42006730</link><dc:creator>achalxyz</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42006730</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42006730</guid></item></channel></rss>