<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: adgshqr3h432</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=adgshqr3h432</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 05:39:50 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=adgshqr3h432" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by adgshqr3h432 in "Precursor – A mobile, open source electronics platform"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>interestingly, bunnie's previous take has been that fabbing your own silicon is likely <i>less</i> secure than using an fpga due to supply chain security<p>if your asic if compromised in tranist, it's a total game over. if your fpga is compromised in transit, the attacker has to have some knowledge of target bitstream<p>it has been argued that by making it easy for end users to rearrange the bitstream, an fpga can be more secure than an asic<p><a href="https://www.bunniestudios.com/blog/?p=5706" rel="nofollow">https://www.bunniestudios.com/blog/?p=5706</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2020 17:00:19 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24528813</link><dc:creator>adgshqr3h432</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24528813</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24528813</guid></item></channel></rss>