<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: adzuci</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=adzuci</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 13:33:20 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=adzuci" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by adzuci in "Ask HN: GitHub employees what's going on? Why?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I think that data is a bit dated and misleading, but I would love to see if AI slop is a contributing factor here once the dust settles and how Github will address it.   Looking at the return to mean in <a href="https://areyougoingexponential.rhys.dev/kdaigle" rel="nofollow">https://areyougoingexponential.rhys.dev/kdaigle</a> makes me think the COO spike could be a Karpathy wiki or an agent too.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2026 16:01:12 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49333153</link><dc:creator>adzuci</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49333153</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49333153</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by adzuci in "Ask HN: GitHub employees what's going on? Why?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Are they? <a href="https://azure.status.microsoft/en-us/status" rel="nofollow">https://azure.status.microsoft/en-us/status</a> doesn't support this afaict.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2026 15:48:44 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49332957</link><dc:creator>adzuci</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49332957</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49332957</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by adzuci in "Ask HN: Who is hiring? (August 2018)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>MassMutual Data Science | Boston | OnSite | Full-Time
Python, Scala, R, Hadoop, Data Engineering, Data Science, SRE<p>Interested in joining a high performing team that creates knowledge from data and builds systems that solve hard problems?<p>Learn more about us at <a href="https://datascience.massmutual.com/science" rel="nofollow">https://datascience.massmutual.com/science</a>.<p>Please apply at <a href="https://datascience.massmutual.com/careers" rel="nofollow">https://datascience.massmutual.com/careers</a> or email digital-hiring@massmutual.com<p>Data Scientist - MassMutual’s Advanced Analytics group is seeking exceptional, highly motivated and self-directed Data Scientists. In this role, you will perform data-driven research, problem solving, and algorithm development through the systematic application of mathematics, statistics and computer science as well as cutting edge data technologies.<p>Data Engineer - Seeking engineers with a passion for solving large data problems. Our data platform develops creative and scalable solutions to difficult technical problems. We rely on tooling such as Hadoop, Kafka, Spark, Python, and Scala.<p>Data Architect - You will be implementing large scale data solutions based on ecosystems ranging over a wide range of persistence platforms such as Vertica, Postgres, Spark and cloud-based storage layers and infrastructure.  The members of the team work with fellow engineers and enterprise stakeholders to develop and maintain data models and metadata system including data registration, dataset cataloging and associated services to support data-driven systems<p>Site Reliability Engineer - Work with our SRE team focused on scaling all aspects of our infrastructure leveraging AWS, K8S, Swarm, Jenkins, Prometheus, Go, and Python. In this role, you will help design and build out the company's digital infrastructure, supporting customer facing web and mobile applications as well as the firm's enterprise data platform.<p>Project Manager - Come help deliver innovative, data-driven products and enhancements aimed at transforming the insurance industry.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2018 21:08:28 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17728523</link><dc:creator>adzuci</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17728523</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17728523</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by adzuci in "Confidant: an open-source secret management service"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I totally agree (we did), though Confidant is in some ways trying to be an extension of existing AWS tools.  
I'm curious what you're using though since I've felt for a while now that every one of these secrets stores have faults or are a giant pain to work with.  
Confidant may be the least offender in that regard & anyone that is trying to make being secure easier or trying to make better tools gets an A in my book.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2015 00:13:37 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10510733</link><dc:creator>adzuci</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10510733</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10510733</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by adzuci in "Confidant: an open-source secret management service"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>We also wanted things to be simple & wrote a custom cli and ansible module to wrap around <a href="https://github.com/oleiade/trousseau" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/oleiade/trousseau</a>, but have slowly found the need for more of the features that tools like these provide.<p>We're planning on switching to Vault or something similar in the near future & will be testing out both of these.  I definitely agree with the "backend" confusion surrounding Vault but I'm interested in where Confidant may be lacking.  We host services on AWS and Heroku, so in some places AWS' KMS may not be the best option.<p>Regardless, I do have to say it's so refreshing to see security tools with decent documentation & a clean user experience.  I'm almost stunned to see a swiftype search box, one page threat model description & preconfigured turn-key container all in one place.  Props to Lyft for opening up a great tool to the masses!</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2015 23:59:04 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10510685</link><dc:creator>adzuci</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10510685</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10510685</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by adzuci in "Show HN: Supercharge GitHub with ZenHub"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>oyanglulu,<p><pre><code>  Do you use gira, at first glance it like it only works on public repos?  It looks like an acceptable but rather thrown together alternative to both Huboard and Zenhub.  
</code></pre>
(Background: we used Huboard, but essentially have too many issues for it to handle & I'm curious what other workflows people use and if Zenhub could handle what Huboard can't.)</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2014 15:23:19 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8533441</link><dc:creator>adzuci</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8533441</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8533441</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by adzuci in "The HTML5 test – How well does your browser support HTML5?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>How does that work?  It went backwards?  And WebKit in what browser?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 11 Apr 2010 23:22:21 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1257910</link><dc:creator>adzuci</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1257910</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1257910</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by adzuci in "The HTML5 test – How well does your browser support HTML5?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Isn't WebKit the only engine to support them now, and isn't in not formalized yet?  But I think KAAZING would make support easily feasible without direct built in support so I'm not too concerned with including it in the score.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 11 Apr 2010 23:20:05 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1257906</link><dc:creator>adzuci</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1257906</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1257906</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by adzuci in "The HTML5 test – How well does your browser support HTML5?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I love the scores posted, I also love that I don't see any above me (Chrome 5.0.371.0) (yet), but I'd like to see a bit of a better breakdown.  Anyone know of some info on some of the conflicts, like I'm missing a few in User Interaction, but I don't know who isn't.  Or other html5 statistics sites, since the topic is a pretty common trend right now.<p>Edit: (Like this: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_layout_engines_(HTML_5)" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_layout_engines_(H...</a> in case its useful to anyone)<p>I agree on the fact that there should be some differentiation between current html5 and proposed, (and that this site is hilarious: <a href="http://isgeolocationpartofhtml5.com/" rel="nofollow">http://isgeolocationpartofhtml5.com/</a>), as well as some of the downfalls of scoring codec support that the author has mentioned, I think I like the out of 155 idea where chrome can go above it.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 11 Apr 2010 23:11:00 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1257880</link><dc:creator>adzuci</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1257880</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1257880</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by adzuci in "Bravo, Apple"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I have to agree with the laughing part, and I might say that calling this a "religious war" is going a bit too far, but I'd say that for emacs vs vim fanatics as well.<p>I'm frustrated with Apple for their choices, but I expect that developers will work with it, and Apple does have some good points to their aid.  Overall, Apple will happily bicker with their developers, but in the end they will always be trying to support them.  On the sarcasm part, I think anyone coming across this and missing that won't think too much about it, and no harm done will be remembered.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 11 Apr 2010 22:50:13 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1257843</link><dc:creator>adzuci</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1257843</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1257843</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by adzuci in "Google Buzz? More Like Buzz Kill"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>* <i>Rips the clock out of the vcr.</i> *, That was fun, great analogy, but how do the generational gaps get jumped?  Intereestingly enough it's pretty easy for me to rip Buzz out of Gmail, its the constant "he doesn't get it" whispering that bugs people.  Everyone tries to advertise to new users, but its hard to do without seeming unnecessary or even evil to so many.  I had the same observation of twitter, but they weren't part of millions of users email.  I think Google will get over the evil hump this time though, for now it looks like an inevitable backlash to how fast they are growing a user base.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 18:54:53 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1118415</link><dc:creator>adzuci</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1118415</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1118415</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by adzuci in "Google Buzz? More Like Buzz Kill"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Good point on the evil, although I'd have to say I'm a little more than peeved overall with the attacks, if anything the article put me more on Google's side.  Yes, Google absorbs startups and imitates any product, but it's competitive edge is the crowd of engineers who say, "Hey, I could do that better".  All its expansions are evolutionary, and they take into consideration all the criticism out there better than most others could.<p>Regardless, if you don't want to Buzz then opt-out, but the competition between Buzz, Twitter, Facebook, and the rest will come down too which are most convenient and affective, followers will take it from there.  Right now though, Buzz can easily replace Twitter for me, but theres a way to go before Facebook starts trembling, and I don't think Orcut is joining the show any time soon.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 18:47:03 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1118393</link><dc:creator>adzuci</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1118393</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1118393</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by adzuci in "Google Buzz? More Like Buzz Kill"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Heh, interesting, I'd say it definitely was made to jump start off of Gmail users, works well for everyone I know, but looks like there are exceptions.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 18:33:41 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1118339</link><dc:creator>adzuci</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1118339</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1118339</guid></item></channel></rss>