<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: aejtaetj</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=aejtaetj</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2026 16:38:51 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=aejtaetj" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by aejtaetj in "We should have the ability to run any code we want on hardware we own"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The editorializing of this article title changes the meaning, please restore it.<p>But to answer the claim, no, only software that you own or are allowed by the software owner to run, is obviously what should be allowed. And clearly illegal and harmful software should not be allowed at all. It's a no-brainer.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2025 15:24:55 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45093461</link><dc:creator>aejtaetj</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45093461</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45093461</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by aejtaetj in "Google AI Overview made up an elaborate story about me"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Every underdog will skimp on safety, especially those in other jurisdictions.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2025 15:15:37 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45093359</link><dc:creator>aejtaetj</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45093359</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45093359</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by aejtaetj in "Nintendo Switch 2 Dock USB-C Compatibility"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The bespoke protocol was the issue.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2025 15:10:16 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45093292</link><dc:creator>aejtaetj</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45093292</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45093292</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by aejtaetj in "Nintendo Switch 2 Dock USB-C Compatibility"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>For consoles, it was actually the original Xbox that started this trend, using a proprietary physical connector, but with a mostly standard usb protocol, for no other purpose than to be consumer hostile. Physical hacks was of course rapidly found in this case to adapt it to be standard compliant.<p>Then again, with xbox360/kinect, the camera was using the usb procotol, but microsoft prevented it from working with pcs in windows. Instead you had to buy a several times more expensive "pc" version, that had the same specs, except for having the malicious compliance tech was removed.<p>I guess nintendo learned from this.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2025 14:54:27 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45093131</link><dc:creator>aejtaetj</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45093131</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45093131</guid></item></channel></rss>