<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: ahl</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=ahl</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2026 20:58:17 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=ahl" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ahl in "Kubernetes on Oxide: How customer needs shaped our integrations"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>does this mean that you won't be killing anyone?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2026 16:28:37 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49288400</link><dc:creator>ahl</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49288400</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49288400</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ahl in "Oxide Computer raises $445M (SEC Form D)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Elsewhere! We’re completing compliance testing to deliver to Europe.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2026 14:28:29 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49183494</link><dc:creator>ahl</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49183494</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49183494</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ahl in "Oxide Computer raises $445M (SEC Form D)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The market is anyone who wants a private cloud but isn’t as big as an Amazon or Google who could build it themselves. Seems like a big enough TAM.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2026 01:03:51 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49177365</link><dc:creator>ahl</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49177365</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49177365</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ahl in "Oxide Computer raises $445M (SEC Form D)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>$400m of Simpsons references is undeniably a good use of VC.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2026 00:16:17 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49177030</link><dc:creator>ahl</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49177030</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49177030</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ahl in "Oxide Computer raises $445M (SEC Form D)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>We've shipped kind of a lot of hardware at this point!</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2026 20:58:13 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49175051</link><dc:creator>ahl</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49175051</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49175051</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ahl in "Oxide Computer raises $445M (SEC Form D)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Hit me up @oxidecomputer.com</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2026 20:57:28 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49175038</link><dc:creator>ahl</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49175038</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49175038</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ahl in "Oxide raises $200M Series C"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>So while most of the software is open source rather than proprietary, you still have a fair point that customers pay for support (as they do with most enterprise products). One could theoretically use the product without first-party software updates, managing the open source oneself... but that would have practical impediments (and runs counter to the all-in-one simplicity that customers value in the Oxide product).<p>Two points about your last point. First, software improvements benefit all customers; as the business grows, the effective cost per customer shrinks. Also, most customers grow their Oxide deployment or will replace hardware after a depreciation cycle. The sustainability of investments into the software (and the product generally) is on solid ground.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2026 16:56:15 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46962827</link><dc:creator>ahl</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46962827</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46962827</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ahl in "illumos"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Oxide uses illumos under the covers That's in no small part due to the composition of the early team--but we have benefitted tremendously from features (ZFS, SMF, FMA, Zones, bhyve, etc.) and observability infrastructure (DTrace, mdb, libproc, etc.) folks on the team have worked on for decades.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2026 20:59:43 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46711486</link><dc:creator>ahl</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46711486</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46711486</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ahl in "Oxide’s compensation model: how is it going?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>This implies that the goal of compensation transparency is to satisfy people's curiosity. I don't think that's the case. Regardless of how it's denominated, I think the goal of compensation transparency is ... uh... equity... no pun intended.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2025 15:49:02 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43871380</link><dc:creator>ahl</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43871380</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43871380</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ahl in "Oxide’s compensation model: how is it going?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>But the real hero was the person who walked 100 yards to home depot <i>and</i> back with the push broom!</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2025 15:46:24 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43871343</link><dc:creator>ahl</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43871343</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43871343</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ahl in "Oxide’s compensation model: how is it going?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>What makes you say that? We talk about salary compensation, yes, but there's also equity compensation.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2025 21:50:34 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43863775</link><dc:creator>ahl</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43863775</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43863775</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ahl in "Oxide’s compensation model: how is it going?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I can't speak for everyone at Oxide, but I'm practically certain that none of us wants to live in Sunnyvale.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2025 21:45:16 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43863720</link><dc:creator>ahl</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43863720</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43863720</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ahl in "Oxide’s compensation model: how is it going?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Several mistakes here, perhaps most egregious: Sun Microsystems might have made some people rich but that was looooong loooooong ago.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2025 21:40:15 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43863669</link><dc:creator>ahl</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43863669</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43863669</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ahl in "Oxide’s compensation model: how is it going?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Which is $167,202 in pre-pandemic, inflation-adjusted dollars.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2025 21:09:56 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43863403</link><dc:creator>ahl</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43863403</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43863403</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ahl in "Oxide’s compensation model: how is it going?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Equity is mentioned in the previous post:<p>> Some will say that we should be talking about equity, not cash compensation. While it’s true that startup equity is important, it’s also true that startup equity doesn’t pay the orthodontist’s bill or get the basement repainted. We believe that every employee should have equity to give them a stake in the company’s future (and that an outsized return for investors should also be an outsized return for employees), but we also believe that the presence of equity can’t be used as an excuse for unsustainably low cash compensation. As for how equity is determined, it really deserves its own in-depth treatment, but in short, equity compensates for risk – and in a startup, risk reduces over time: the first employee takes much more risk than the hundredth.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2025 20:14:07 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43862834</link><dc:creator>ahl</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43862834</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43862834</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ahl in "ZFS: Apple's new filesystem that wasn't (2016)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I didn't watch it in its entirety, but I'm familiar with Allan's work. There doesn't seem to be anything fundamental to the design of ZFS that his talk highlights as limiting, but there are many areas that have benefitted from optimization and tuning.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2025 03:12:31 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43840882</link><dc:creator>ahl</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43840882</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43840882</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ahl in "Synadia backs down from CNCF trademark dispute"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The claim is Collison directly to them:<p>> Synadia CEO Derek Collison told Runtime Tuesday that the company intends to transfer the NATS trademark to the CNCF at some point in the future "because we just feel that the damage to the ecosystem and the ugliness is not worth it for anyone." While nothing will be official until the lawyers sort it out, Collison said "my hope is that [this dispute] forces some open dialog outside of the CNCF and outside of NATS about the state of open source. I think open source for companies like Synadia is at a crossroads."</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2025 03:02:47 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43840825</link><dc:creator>ahl</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43840825</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43840825</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[Synadia backs down from CNCF trademark dispute]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://www.runtime.news/synadia-backs-down-from-cncf-trademark-dispute/">https://www.runtime.news/synadia-backs-down-from-cncf-trademark-dispute/</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43839994">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43839994</a></p>
<p>Points: 3</p>
<p># Comments: 2</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2025 00:57:23 +0000</pubDate><link>https://www.runtime.news/synadia-backs-down-from-cncf-trademark-dispute/</link><dc:creator>ahl</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43839994</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43839994</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ahl in "ZFS: Apple's new filesystem that wasn't (2016)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Embarrassed to say I had forgotten writing that <i>and</i> LOLed myself… no more reliable audience for your sense of humor than yourself!</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2025 14:36:26 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43821980</link><dc:creator>ahl</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43821980</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43821980</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ahl in "ZFS: Apple's new filesystem that wasn't (2016)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Maybe! Bryan and I were pretty close to the case and to the implementation of ZFS. But maybe Apple did detect some smoking gun of which somehow we were unaware. I (still) think Jonathan’s preannouncement was the catalyst for Apple changing direction.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2025 13:34:22 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43821383</link><dc:creator>ahl</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43821383</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43821383</guid></item></channel></rss>