<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: ai4eva</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=ai4eva</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2026 21:10:47 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=ai4eva" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ai4eva in "Everyone is capable of, and can benefit from, mathematical thinking"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>there is a debate between the intuitionists, formalists, and the symbolists nicely captured in the intro chapter of Heyting's Intuitionism.<p>constructive mathematics is close to computation and programming. and many including myself have a natural feel or intuition for it. A majority of euclids elements, and galois's original proof are constructive in nature.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 21 Nov 2024 15:26:09 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42205208</link><dc:creator>ai4eva</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42205208</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42205208</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ai4eva in "Everyone is capable of, and can benefit from, mathematical thinking"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>lol yea.<p>bayesian thinking doesnt come to me naturally.. i have no intuition for it. seems forced. believe me - i have tried.  but there are those who are swearing by it.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 21 Nov 2024 15:14:08 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42205058</link><dc:creator>ai4eva</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42205058</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42205058</guid></item></channel></rss>