Because cloud hardware doesn't have all the burdens of physically managing a real server. Replacing SSDs. Upgrading RAM. Logging to a iDRAC to restart a crashed server. All those things don't exist in the cloud and make you loose so much operational time. That's why clouds will ALWAYS cost more than bare metal. The cons is that with cloud you keep paying for the same servers: there are no assets anymore, only costs.

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35226076

Points: 1

# Comments: 0

All the rooms have a live capture device sitting on the speaker's desks. This not only streams every room live on the website, but also deposits the feed on a server . By the moment your speech is finished, you receive an automated mail with a link to cut your video. It is a limited web editor where you can change the beginning and the end of the stream, and changing audio channel too (talks are recorded with 3 mics). You can accept the video as it is or do some adjustments and, voilà: a quick ffmpeg and the video is online ready to be viewed in a couple of hours.

I don't know you, but I am not aware of other conferences where the video recording is managed with such a DevOps pipeline.

That said, in the former kind on company (the one that allows you to break you neck as you wish), I find extremely educational doing self-reviews, especially if you do them incrementally as the year passes by so that, by the time the review is needed, you just need to "JIT" the document and serve it out. It provides a way to tell in advance if you are working on something that feels like bullshit on paper.

Government is proposing bills not have messages read by officers (something that not even inside Meta can be done due to EU's Electronic Privacy Directive) but to "scan them": have machineries check for violating content, pretty much as a parcel is put under xrays in the airport to check for bombs or drugs.

The law protects also the right of a company to protect itself against being blamed for misuses of its services, not only individuals' rights.

While I fully support lobbying efforts like stopscanningme, because they rise awareness in people that ultimately vote governments so that they might do more informed voting choices, I just don't condone all of this whining about mass surveillance on privately operated companies:

remember that gmail, facebook, whatsapp, etc.. are for profit, privately held companies that are held accountable for the content that circulates on their platforms. Companies, like any other citizen, must abide the law and not become a free field for Child Exploitation or Adult Exploitation Imagery.

You want total privacy, which in your mind is the word for "unaccountability"? Use different services or setup your own.

The topic is very vast, but it can't really handled by just saying "bad government, want to wiretap!"