<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: ajross</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=ajross</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2026 23:19:13 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=ajross" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ajross in "The US tried to stop cartel money-laundering; devastated mom-and-pop businesses"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>This article is repeating a transparently false framing as the truth.  This wasn't a law about cartel money laundering, which doesn't happen near the border anyway.  Money laundering at scale happens in the global market and always has.<p>The clear purpose of the regulation was exactly the "side effect" detailed in the article: hurting immigrant communities that maintain ties across the border.  And it worked.  It does no one any good to pretend otherwise.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2026 15:11:02 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49259631</link><dc:creator>ajross</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49259631</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49259631</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ajross in "Amazon circumvents Gilroy community vote for AI data center"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>This is going to sound like I'm flipping sides in this thread: but yeah, absolutely.  Otherwise people in Gilroy would have hated datacenters when the planning started and Amazon would have built in Fresno or wherever.<p>Really both sides are insane in this battle.  People are angry about social change, injustice, perceived loss of status and are taking out those frustrations on totems like "Buildings Owned by Big Tech".  Which is wrong.  But it's equally wrong to ignore those concerns and try to align with their political enemies, which only makes this worse.  (We saw exactly this thing happen with the vaccine madness just half a decade ago!)<p>To wit: we're all going to hell in a handbasket and this community is 100% as much at fault as the big data opposition front.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2026 14:25:43 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49231732</link><dc:creator>ajross</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49231732</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49231732</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ajross in "Amazon circumvents Gilroy community vote for AI data center"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Two things can be true: the construction can be technically legal <i>and</i> at clear odds with community opinion.<p>I mean, yes.  Amazon can likely do this.  But is this strategy really in keeping with its long term interests?  I mean, look at the comments in the rest of this very topic.  Do you want a communist insurrection?  This is literally how you get communist insurrections.  People are fucking pissed, and the bourge^M^M^M^M funding-focused growth-minded startup set here are throwing gasoline on the fire.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2026 13:42:15 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49231349</link><dc:creator>ajross</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49231349</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49231349</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ajross in "Oracle cut its Always Free ARM limits to 2 OCPU / 12GB, enforced Aug 18"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>But... <i>does</i> Amazon say things in their free tier are "always" free?  I don't think they do.  This was an Oracle lie.<p>If you take a service that you told someone was "always free" and start charging them for that, that's a lie.  It just is.  I'm gobsmacked that this community views this as acceptable marketing.  Is this the moral foundation of our new era of startup overlords?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2026 17:02:38 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49213341</link><dc:creator>ajross</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49213341</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49213341</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ajross in "Oracle cut its Always Free ARM limits to 2 OCPU / 12GB, enforced Aug 18"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Expecting someone to lie doesn't mean rolling over and refusing to acknowledge it.  Not unlike people making the expected reactionary cynical commentary on internet forums still demands a response.<p>I mean, you're very perceptive!  But that's not very interesting, it's sort of the price of admission here at HN.  Oracle lying in its product naming is more so.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2026 16:31:55 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49185155</link><dc:creator>ajross</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49185155</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49185155</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ajross in "Oracle cut its Always Free ARM limits to 2 OCPU / 12GB, enforced Aug 18"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> Were you expecting a massive evil corporation to keep spending $50 every month on you forever?<p>When they offer something "always"... yes?  Are "always" and "forever" not synonyms?<p>I'm not arguing about the economics or motivation, just pointing out that simple language says that they lied.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2026 16:13:06 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49184852</link><dc:creator>ajross</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49184852</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49184852</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ajross in "Oracle cut its Always Free ARM limits to 2 OCPU / 12GB, enforced Aug 18"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>So... what did "Always" mean, exactly?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2026 15:56:51 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49184646</link><dc:creator>ajross</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49184646</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49184646</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ajross in "Security Incident INC-2026-07-28-01 – UK AI Security Institute [pdf]"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> Why are you assuming that the other kinds of testing aren’t happening?<p>Rather, I'm assuming that the "Is there protection in place for when the AI tries to backdoor github projects?" test was, if it was done at all, insufficient.<p>I mean, yes, I'm being glib and laughing at you a bit.  But, dude...  If your point is that isolation testing of AI is fundamentally impossible, then that's just silly. As pointed out upthread, an airgap would have (1) been trivial to implement and (2) extremely effective.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2026 22:54:15 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49176392</link><dc:creator>ajross</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49176392</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49176392</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ajross in "Security Incident INC-2026-07-28-01 – UK AI Security Institute [pdf]"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> Because the agents aren’t going to run airgapped in real life.<p>Exactly.  This logic is precisely why aircraft engineering doesn't bother with component testing or envelope limitation during testing and just full-sends the first assembled airliner that comes off the line.  The engines aren't going to run on the ground in real life, after all.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2026 22:37:37 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49176222</link><dc:creator>ajross</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49176222</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49176222</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ajross in "Nobel Disease"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Oooph.  I'm going to be charitable and make a (horrifying) steelman point for you: Eugenics can be understood as a subset of the ideas of plant and animal breeding that have been practiced for centuries.  Those are scientifically sound, thus the idea that humans can be bred for certain traits should be too.<p><i>THAT SAID</i>, "Eugenics" as espoused and understood over the past two centuries isn't that at all.  It's 100%, every time, a pretty face for racism.  Human social and ancestry divisions <i>ARE NOT</i> the product of deliberate selection, never have been, and any attempt to conflate the ideas is, yeah, pretty fucking unsound.  And horrifying.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2026 14:29:02 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49169510</link><dc:creator>ajross</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49169510</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49169510</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ajross in "YC founder asks desperate job seekers to tattoo themselves for an interview"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Ew.  At what point do we just decide that this whole community has eaten itself?  Remember when a "YC founder" was a diligent nerd just trying to make something people want and get to ramen-profitable before the runway from their tiny seed check ran out?<p>Now being a founder is such a valuable status that it's attracting people who thinking that ghoulish worshipful body art (on the bodies of people afflicted with the same status envy, it needs to be pointed out) is a great idea.<p>Do the nerds even have a home anymore?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2026 22:05:33 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49138929</link><dc:creator>ajross</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49138929</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49138929</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ajross in "Why a $154B CEO just endorsed stripping most Americans of voting rights"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>You're still misunderstanding what a "vote" is in your laser focus on "taxes".  Take "taxes" out of the mix.  What's the point of voting at all, in your view?  Why bother with it as a concept vs. whatever governmental form you prefer?  It's so that the government does what the people want instead of what the leaders want, right?<p>So why does that principle change when some people are poor or when the tax structure is progressive?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2026 19:57:39 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49089096</link><dc:creator>ajross</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49089096</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49089096</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ajross in "Why a $154B CEO just endorsed stripping most Americans of voting rights"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Why are you not against this?  A vote isn't a payment in exchange for taxes.  It's the mechanism by which the government represents the will of the people.  How do you arrange things such that the government acts in the interests of people if it doesn't need to chase their vote?  Or are you <i>actually</i> saying that poor people don't deserve a government that acts in their interest?<p>Even skipping the moral argument, there's a game theory trap here: let's say you run a government and your political enemies are on the poor side and fall into the "no vote" trap more often than your supporters.  Obviously the solution to maximizing your share of the vote <i>is to make them even poorer</i>.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2026 14:47:05 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49084798</link><dc:creator>ajross</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49084798</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49084798</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ajross in "Google Discloses $94.1B in SpaceX Stock, Marking 6% Stake"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Well,  yes.  They're the ones who actually employ the hundred lawyers and PR staff.  But that's what it takes, and it's not about clicking some buttons on a Web 2.0 Day Trading UI.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2026 14:57:20 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49058810</link><dc:creator>ajross</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49058810</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49058810</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ajross in "Google Discloses $94.1B in SpaceX Stock, Marking 6% Stake"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>This is a micro/macro mistake.  You obviously can't dump a 6% stake at strike price on Robinhood.<p>"The Market", at this scale, means "You find the buyer(s) yourself and work up the deal with a hundred lawyers and PR staff and hope the contract negotiation stays secret".</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2026 13:39:23 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49058127</link><dc:creator>ajross</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49058127</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49058127</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ajross in "IRGC claims it destroyed Amazon's Bahrain data center"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Genuine apology if that's the sense you got.  I'd love to hear the nuance. Please deliver it.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 15:37:00 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49048498</link><dc:creator>ajross</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49048498</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49048498</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ajross in "Android May Soon Restrict On-Device ADB"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> To be honest, it is quite scary that Google is able to remotely roll out an app like that to all GMS Android phones.<p>Are any commercial mobile phone vendors <i>not</i> able to do such a thing?  Do remember that this giant kerfuffle is all over the seeming preparation for the apparent removal of a developer feature that <i>iPhones have never had at all</i>.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 15:36:03 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49048484</link><dc:creator>ajross</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49048484</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49048484</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ajross in "IRGC claims it destroyed Amazon's Bahrain data center"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>As mentioned, if you want to talk nuance bring the nuance to your comment.  Don't try to fake it with "Even Bush and Biden" to make yourself feel smart on HN.  You aren't, that shit's dangerous because it excuses further malfesance.  Bush and Biden left a functioning gulf, Trump didn't.  That difference is important even if you want to talk nuance.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 00:14:55 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49043194</link><dc:creator>ajross</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49043194</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49043194</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ajross in "IRGC claims it destroyed Amazon's Bahrain data center"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Exactly.  General opposition to the war on terror and the US in general has blinded you to obvious analysis that things were basically OK seven months ago and they're shit now, and there's a reason for that that isn't anything to do with US hegemony or whatever.<p>If you want to oppose imperialist scum, this makes sense.  If you want the global economy to not be shit, it doesn't.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 19:19:11 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49040445</link><dc:creator>ajross</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49040445</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49040445</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ajross in "IRGC claims it destroyed Amazon's Bahrain data center"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>This is absolutely 100% true, which is why deliberately destroying all the pre-existing structural deterrents to their bad behavior was such a disaster.<p>Iran did bad things, but not as much as they could.  Now they're doing more bad things and we can't stop them.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 16:50:58 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49038325</link><dc:creator>ajross</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49038325</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49038325</guid></item></channel></rss>