Examples?

> Generation effect: Accepting generated code and decreasing generating one's own code can skip the active processing that builds understanding.

Holy truth.

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48062692

Points: 1

# Comments: 0

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48046822

Points: 2

# Comments: 0

This is the key: a person's reputation and the writer's responsibility.

But how will we learn to become sensitive to these social reputation signals?

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48040791

Points: 11

# Comments: 2

The best teachers, the best tutors, the best learning resources, they’ve always been concentrated in a small number of places and available to a small number of people.

In my opinion, the AI has the potential to genuinely disrupt that.

The direction of travel is toward a world where a kid in a rural area with a smartphone has access to a quality of personalized instruction that would have been unimaginable only one generation ago.

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47959843

Points: 2

# Comments: 2

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47931785

Points: 2

# Comments: 0

So.. the radiations has had virtually no impact on the natural ecosystem's regrowth?

Not only... we've always been told about the disastrous consequences of nuclear radiation, but, according to the BBC article (by Chris Baraniuk), that's not the case.

I don't know... I'm quite perplexed.

This means:

- less and less "man-in-the-loop"

- less and less interaction between LLMs and humans

- more and more automation

- more and more decision-making autonomy for agents

- more and more risk (i.e., LLMs' responsibility)

- less and less human responsibility

Problem:

Tasks that require continuous iteration and shared decision-making with humans have two possible options:

- either they stall until human input

- or they decide autonomously at our risk

Unfortunately, automation comes at a cost: RISK.

Hype helps raise funds, of course, and sells, of course.

But it doesn't necessarily lead to long-term sustainability of investments.

In my opinion, nothing could be more wrong. GitHub's own ratings are easily manipulated and measure not necessarily the quality of the project itself, but rather its Popularity. The problem is that popularity is rarely directly proportional to the quality of the project itself.

I'm building a product and I'm seeing what important is the distribution and comunication instead of the development it self.

Unfortunately, a project's popularity is often directly proportional to the communication "built" around it and inversely proportional to its actual quality. This isn't always the case, but it often is.

Moreover, adopting effective and objective project evaluation tools is quite expensive for VCs.

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47777231

Points: 1

# Comments: 0

This is the top!

This is a typical example of someone using Coding Agents without being a developer: AI that isn't used knowingly can be a huge risk if you don't know what you're doing.

AI used for professional purposes (not experiments) should NOT be used haphazardly.

And this also opens up a serious liability issue: the developer has the perception of being exempt from responsibility and this also leads to enormous risks for the business.

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47762908

Points: 1

# Comments: 0