<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: alexmuresan</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=alexmuresan</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 00:27:41 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=alexmuresan" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by alexmuresan in "Cyberscript"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Interesting concept I guess. But the website reads like poorly AI generated code. No information as to what the grey and orange bars mean, overlapping text and such.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2026 12:07:00 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49143723</link><dc:creator>alexmuresan</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49143723</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49143723</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by alexmuresan in "Artificial Intelligence: Ars Notoria and the Promise of Instant Knowledge"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Well the book does promise to give the reader intelligence and knowledge acquired through means other than the natural way. So in, that way I think “artificial” makes sense.<p>I think it’s a bit tongue in cheek and maybe a slight jab aimed at people that use AI(LLMs) to appear smarter than they are.<p>The text was interesting.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2026 11:46:53 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49143570</link><dc:creator>alexmuresan</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49143570</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49143570</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by alexmuresan in "What I'm Hearing About Cognitive Debt (So Far)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>While I agree with this, I think these are two different stances: the one you mention is a natural progression of moving, the way you put it, from programmer to founder. It’s something you want to do. An intentional move. While my stance is more similar to saying: “I want to be a programmer but I am forced to be a PM”. I’m forced by corporate culture (so to speak) to coordinate AI agents.<p>I don’t mind adapting. And you are right. I just loved writing code too.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 10:53:16 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48034755</link><dc:creator>alexmuresan</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48034755</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48034755</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by alexmuresan in "What I'm Hearing About Cognitive Debt (So Far)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The post makes some good points. As a programmer I love writing code. I know coding is just a tool but I enjoy the act of thinking about a problem, finding a solution and implementing it. It gives me a little dopamine boost.<p>Ever since LLMs started writing decent code, I started feeling like a part of that joy of code-writing has been taken away.<p>Using LLMs literally leaves a developer to do (what I find is) the worst part about software development: debugging someone else’s code.<p>Besides this, everything feels rushed. I am under the impression that I can’t “take my time” to think about a problem anymore. It almost feels wasteful now. I have to “just do it”.<p>It makes me nostalgic and I feel like I’ve lost something about coding that made me enjoy it.<p>But it is the reality we live in and I’m adapting to it. What I’m wondering is whether I should adapt or, rather, push back.<p>That being said: this feels a little like it was written using AI.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 05:50:31 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48018563</link><dc:creator>alexmuresan</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48018563</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48018563</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by alexmuresan in "Talking to strangers at the gym"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I avoided this book for a long time. for some reason I got it in my head that it's a sort of red pilled book that teaches you how to manipulate people. I know it's very shallow on my side, but I somehow crystallized this opinion based on a few acquaintances that claimed to read it and instead that they include the name of a person they just met in every sentence because it made that person like them more.<p>Your comment made me consider reading it. This rant about radiating happiness towards people without expecting something in return gives me a different insight on his reasons for writing the book.<p>I might give it a shot. Thank you</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 13:59:34 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48008887</link><dc:creator>alexmuresan</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48008887</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48008887</guid></item></channel></rss>