I would suggest making the analytics less aggressive and adding some kind of error catching so that it doesn't attempt to send data hundreds and hundreds of times.

  def calculate_backlinks(
      pages: Dict[str, Page], attachments: Dict[str, Attachment]
  ) -> None:
      for page in pages.values():
          for link in page.links:
              linked_page = find(pages, attachments, link)
              if not linked_page:
                  info(f"unable to find link", link, page.title)
                  continue
             
  linked_page.backlinks.append(page)

[0] From OP's static site generator: https://github.com/llimllib/obsidian_notes/blob/main/run.py

A typical design pattern on mobile is that if information is obscured for some reason, you click on it to expand it. Consider a drop-down text box on a blog: there's a little arrow and cut-off text with an ellipsis (...). When you click on the arrow, the cut-off text expands to fill the screen and allows you to read the rest of it. In contrast to what other users have said, this doesn't need to be idempotent. Tapping again hides the box.

To apply this design pattern to your site, simply make it so that tapping anywhere on a bar brings the UI to a known state, eg with the bar in the center with the text at a readable scale. This would work either horizontally or vertically.

Benefits:

- Your idea of the UI rescaling is preserved, and you can preserve the animations between states. I think the "rescaling bars" idea is fun.

- Cause and effect is preserved. If I want to read the text on the bar, I should not have to click on some arbitrary point above the current location of the bar.

- Further, the user does not have to hunt for the correct spot to click on a bar to make the text visible. Instead, clicking on a bar immediately and always makes all the information on that bar fully visible, by design.

I think this tweak would significantly improve the experience of interacting with the website.

The speed of sound in an ideal (calorically perfect) gas is given by

  a = sqrt( gamma * R * T )

  Earth:
  R = R_atm = 287 J / (kg * K)
  gamma = 1.44
  T = 293 K (taking room temperature as an average temperature)

  Mars:
  R = R_CO2 = 188 J / (kg * K)
  gamma = 1.37
  T = 210 K (from a quick google, about -60 deg C)

  a_mars = 232 m/s
  a_earth = 347 m/s

     Z = N x N (Cartesian product or sum type)
     for p, q in Z: p=q if p.first + q.second = q.first + p.second
     p + q := (p.first + q.first, p.second + q.second)
     p - q := (p.first + q.second, p.second + q.first)

    A = W / P

    Assuming a baseline of a moderately wide tire for the wheel size.
      - Scaling both of these to make both wider than the OEM tire (but still running a setup that fits in the car without serious modifications) generally gives better dry braking and better lap times.
      - In wet conditions, wider setups often have better braking distances (though this depends a lot on the specific setup) and better lap times, but also aquaplane at lower speeds.
      - Just increasing the wheel width and using the same tire generally gives you better lap times, within reason.
      - Just increasing the tire width and leaving wheel width fixed generally results in worse lap times.

I was originally going to post this as a facile gotcha, until I thought about it slightly harder and realized that effectively disbanding the military would actually be a pretty good idea, all considered. However, I would still argue that we should accept monetary rewards for altruistic yet dangerous acts, like fighting fires and rescuing cats from trees (and donating kidneys).

Unrelated, but a "costumer" makes costumes. I think you were looking for "customer".

- The car is going to turn left (one blinking yellow light) - The car is going to turn right (one blinking yellow light) - The car is stopping (three solid red lights) - An unspecified error occurred (two blinking yellow lights).

It's not exactly a high - bandwidth form of communication. Most of the purpose of the lights behind your car is to remind other human drivers of your continued existence. As you point out, some of this deficiency can be made up by not looking at them.

Imagine a world where you could automatically talk over an intercom with the driver in front of you about traffic conditions. I bet you'd find safer, better-informed driving. Self-driving cars make that theoretically easy and humanly pleasant.

    To every condition there corresponds a set of things meeting the condition. 

Your example would not violate the axiom of unrestricted comprehension. No primes are divisible by 4, so the set of all primes divisible by 4 is the empty set. Russell's paradox does. He chose a condition that depends on the result of creating a set using that condition. "The set of all sets that do not contain themselves" can't contain itself, but it can't not contain itself either -- since either case would imply the opposite must be true.

The result is that unrestricted comprehension gets pared back. Instead of building a set from a condition, all sets must be built from a condition and a pre-existing set. A single infinite set corresponding to the natural numbers is given as an axiom, and all further sets (integers, real numbers, topological spaces, fields, and so on) are built from there.