<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: altin0</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=altin0</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2026 20:10:43 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=altin0" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by altin0 in "Netlify just sent me a $104k bill for a simple static site"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>the CEO said they're "forgiving any bills from legitimate mistakes" which effectively means "just make everything zero dollars bro".
And no, he didn't use all that bandwidth, he was victim of a DDoS which the hosting provider should have measures in place to prevent or limit the service if it happens.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2024 14:36:42 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39524607</link><dc:creator>altin0</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39524607</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39524607</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by altin0 in "Netlify just sent me a $104k bill for a simple static site"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It's only a weird take if you don't have any common sense. It's super simple:
either offer unlimited bandwidth(since you're not charging these anyways), like Cloudflare Pages does, 
or put in place controls that will allow customer to set a top limit for their budget. You can't just all of a sudden send them a $104K bill and expect them to pay when the've never spent more than a few bucks. And then even worse, you can't pretend to expect them to pay 20%, then 5% then pretend you're doing them a favor by completely liftig it off. That's just arbitrary billing and preying for any victim that would fall and agree to pay 20% or 5% etc. I'm just asking for common sense and practices that build trust, not arbitraty billing rules.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2024 14:00:51 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39524180</link><dc:creator>altin0</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39524180</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39524180</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by altin0 in "Netlify just sent me a $104k bill for a simple static site"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Lol this deescalated pretty quickly, went from $104K to $20K to $5K to $0 
Which basically means you almost scammed the customer for $5K or $20K. Super negative practices. I for one could never trust a company operating in that manner. It would be much more honest to say "unlimited bandwidth" and set a hard-limit for maximum budget, then people know they won't be charged, than to go through all this crap and then pretend you're doing a favor to the customer (you're not). If I'm normally spending $10/month any idiot out there would know for sure that I'm not going to spend $104K instantly. That's a very basic filter to have. But you don't place such filters because obviously you're working on the principle to scam people many thousands of $ if they fall for that. Heck, for all we know you might send that amount of traffic to your customer and the try to scam them and if it doesn't work then pretend you're doing them a favor.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2024 13:16:30 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39523684</link><dc:creator>altin0</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39523684</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39523684</guid></item></channel></rss>