<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: anana_</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=anana_</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2026 11:04:55 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=anana_" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by anana_ in "Qwen3.8 27B scores 52 on Artificial Analysis"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Agreed. Luckily, this model also scores high in AA non-hallucination, so it knows what it doesn't know -- perfect for situations where it can just tool call a web search.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2026 18:48:10 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49335776</link><dc:creator>anana_</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49335776</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49335776</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by anana_ in "Qwen3.8 27B scores 52 on Artificial Analysis"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>And to read the tea leaves a little:<p>3.8 actually performs slightly <i>worse</i> than 3.6 on AA-Omniscience Accuracy, which could imply that they traded out world knowledge for capability in other areas.<p>It also produces nearly twice as many tokens per task as 3.6 (and by extension, time), which may be a tradeoff required to achieve correctness at this parameter size.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2026 18:22:54 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49335409</link><dc:creator>anana_</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49335409</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49335409</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by anana_ in "Qwen3.8 27B scores 52 on Artificial Analysis"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>For more context, this puts it on par with models like GLM 5.2 and GPT 5.6 Luna, which are far larger</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2026 17:30:43 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49334622</link><dc:creator>anana_</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49334622</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49334622</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[Qwen3.8 27B scores 52 on Artificial Analysis]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/qwen3-8-27b">https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/qwen3-8-27b</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49334544">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49334544</a></p>
<p>Points: 350</p>
<p># Comments: 157</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2026 17:25:17 +0000</pubDate><link>https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/qwen3-8-27b</link><dc:creator>anana_</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49334544</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49334544</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by anana_ in "Qwen 3.8 27B"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>When stuff like this: <a href="https://doublespeed.ai/" rel="nofollow">https://doublespeed.ai/</a>
exists I don't find that hard to believe at all, although it cuts both ways</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2026 21:51:08 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49305016</link><dc:creator>anana_</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49305016</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49305016</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by anana_ in "Qwen 3.8 27B"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Seems like MTP is available immediately!</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2026 16:20:41 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49300875</link><dc:creator>anana_</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49300875</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49300875</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by anana_ in "Qwen3.8-27B"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>As was the case with GLM 5.3, it seems that there is still much juice to be squeezed from post-training</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2026 16:19:11 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49300850</link><dc:creator>anana_</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49300850</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49300850</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by anana_ in "Qwen 3.8 27B"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Monstrous benchmarks! Hoping it is not benchmaxxed.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2026 15:15:48 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49299866</link><dc:creator>anana_</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49299866</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49299866</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by anana_ in "GLM-5.3: Frontier coding with emergent cyber capabilities"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>What a week for AI model releases</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2026 05:38:59 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49295079</link><dc:creator>anana_</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49295079</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49295079</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by anana_ in "Qwen 3.8"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Apparently agentic performance in Gemma was improved recently: <a href="https://x.com/googlegemma/status/2077449152062247219" rel="nofollow">https://x.com/googlegemma/status/2077449152062247219</a><p>Too little too late imo</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 17:38:30 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48970087</link><dc:creator>anana_</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48970087</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48970087</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by anana_ in "Ornith-1.0: self-improving open-source models for agentic coding"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>They keep mentioning a 31B dense model, but there are no benchmarks or weights for it anywhere?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2026 20:12:49 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48724527</link><dc:creator>anana_</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48724527</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48724527</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by anana_ in "Qwen-AgentWorld: Language World Models for General Agents"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It looks like the purpose of this model is to i. generate environmental sim data for doing RL on other models or ii. act as a foundation model (they trained it to select actions as well as predicting the next state in the same loop?)<p>Either way, neither are intended for end consumers.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2026 16:58:26 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48662696</link><dc:creator>anana_</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48662696</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48662696</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by anana_ in "Qwen-AgentWorld: Language World Models for General Agents"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I believe the benchmark listed is about simulating the environment for the various tasks, rather than doing them. It seems that the point of this model is to generate sim data to improve other models with</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2026 07:42:55 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48656531</link><dc:creator>anana_</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48656531</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48656531</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by anana_ in "Ask HN: Has anyone replaced Claude/GPT with a local model for daily coding?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Unfortunately on Strix Halo or any similar unified memory set up, dense models are gonna be dirt slow due to the tiny memory bandwidth... But I agree, 27B is superior.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2026 18:40:06 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48545336</link><dc:creator>anana_</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48545336</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48545336</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by anana_ in "Ask HN: Has anyone replaced Claude/GPT with a local model for daily coding?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Perhaps try a different model? Just from anecdotal experience, I find that the Gemma models smaller than 31B do not tool call as often as they should.<p>Some of the benchmarks appear to back this up [0]<p>Of course, a lot depends how you are using it (inference parameters, harness, prompting, etc.), but the model is quite important too.<p>[0]: <a href="https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/open-source/small?models=qwen3-6-27b%2Cqwen3-6-35b-a3b%2Cgemma-4-31b%2Cqwen3-6-27b-non-reasoning%2Cqwen3-5-9b%2Cgemma-4-31b-non-reasoning%2Cqwen3-6-35b-a3b-non-reasoning%2Cgemma-4-26b-a4b%2Cqwen3-5-35b-a3b-non-reasoning%2Cgemma-4-12b#intelligence-evaluations" rel="nofollow">https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/open-source/small?model...</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2026 18:38:06 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48545298</link><dc:creator>anana_</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48545298</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48545298</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by anana_ in "CrankGPT"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I have one too and it never occurred to me to use it for anything other than games. Would be interested in seeing how you did it!</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2026 18:09:43 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48544987</link><dc:creator>anana_</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48544987</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48544987</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by anana_ in "LinkedIn is scanning browser extensions"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>They do now - <a href="https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/use-sidebar-access-tools-and-vertical-tabs" rel="nofollow">https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/use-sidebar-access-tool...</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 22:22:24 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47969018</link><dc:creator>anana_</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47969018</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47969018</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by anana_ in "Kimi K2.6: Advancing open-source coding"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Hypothesizing here, but maybe the idea is sort of a form of technological/economic warfare? Releasing performance equivalent yet more cost efficient open weight models should in theory drive the cost of inference down everywhere.<p>This I assume will make it more difficult for US AI labs to turn a profit, which might make investors question their sky high valuations.<p>Any sort of melt down in the AI sector would almost certainly spread to the wider US market.<p>In contrast, in China, most of the funding for AI is coming directly from the government, so it's unlikely the same capital flight scenario would happen.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 18:35:06 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47838643</link><dc:creator>anana_</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47838643</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47838643</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by anana_ in "I ran Gemma 4 as a local model in Codex CLI"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I'm not saying it's the latest Qwen iteration - that would be Qwen3.6.<p>I'm saying it's the latest iteration of the finetuned model mentioned in the parent comment.<p>I'm also not suggesting that it's "the latest and greatest" anything. In fact, I think it's rather clear that I'm suggesting the opposite? As in - how can a small fine tune produce better results than a frontier lab's work?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2026 11:27:26 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47750523</link><dc:creator>anana_</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47750523</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47750523</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by anana_ in "I ran Gemma 4 as a local model in Codex CLI"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It's rather surprising that a solo dev can squeeze more performance out of a model with rather humble resources vs a frontier lab. I'm skeptical of claims that such a fine-tuned model is "better" -- maybe on certain benchmarks, but overall?<p>FYI the latest iteration of that finetune is here: <a href="https://huggingface.co/Jackrong/Qwopus3.5-27B-v3" rel="nofollow">https://huggingface.co/Jackrong/Qwopus3.5-27B-v3</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2026 09:38:45 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47749755</link><dc:creator>anana_</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47749755</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47749755</guid></item></channel></rss>