<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: anana_</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=anana_</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2026 04:15:19 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=anana_" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by anana_ in "Ask HN: Has anyone replaced Claude/GPT with a local model for daily coding?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Unfortunately on Strix Halo or any similar unified memory set up, dense models are gonna be dirt slow due to the tiny memory bandwidth... But I agree, 27B is superior.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2026 18:40:06 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48545336</link><dc:creator>anana_</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48545336</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48545336</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by anana_ in "Ask HN: Has anyone replaced Claude/GPT with a local model for daily coding?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Perhaps try a different model? Just from anecdotal experience, I find that the Gemma models smaller than 31B do not tool call as often as they should.<p>Some of the benchmarks appear to back this up [0]<p>Of course, a lot depends how you are using it (inference parameters, harness, prompting, etc.), but the model is quite important too.<p>[0]: <a href="https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/open-source/small?models=qwen3-6-27b%2Cqwen3-6-35b-a3b%2Cgemma-4-31b%2Cqwen3-6-27b-non-reasoning%2Cqwen3-5-9b%2Cgemma-4-31b-non-reasoning%2Cqwen3-6-35b-a3b-non-reasoning%2Cgemma-4-26b-a4b%2Cqwen3-5-35b-a3b-non-reasoning%2Cgemma-4-12b#intelligence-evaluations" rel="nofollow">https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/open-source/small?model...</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2026 18:38:06 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48545298</link><dc:creator>anana_</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48545298</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48545298</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by anana_ in "CrankGPT"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I have one too and it never occurred to me to use it for anything other than games. Would be interested in seeing how you did it!</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2026 18:09:43 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48544987</link><dc:creator>anana_</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48544987</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48544987</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by anana_ in "LinkedIn is scanning browser extensions"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>They do now - <a href="https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/use-sidebar-access-tools-and-vertical-tabs" rel="nofollow">https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/use-sidebar-access-tool...</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 22:22:24 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47969018</link><dc:creator>anana_</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47969018</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47969018</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by anana_ in "Kimi K2.6: Advancing open-source coding"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Hypothesizing here, but maybe the idea is sort of a form of technological/economic warfare? Releasing performance equivalent yet more cost efficient open weight models should in theory drive the cost of inference down everywhere.<p>This I assume will make it more difficult for US AI labs to turn a profit, which might make investors question their sky high valuations.<p>Any sort of melt down in the AI sector would almost certainly spread to the wider US market.<p>In contrast, in China, most of the funding for AI is coming directly from the government, so it's unlikely the same capital flight scenario would happen.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 18:35:06 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47838643</link><dc:creator>anana_</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47838643</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47838643</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by anana_ in "I ran Gemma 4 as a local model in Codex CLI"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I'm not saying it's the latest Qwen iteration - that would be Qwen3.6.<p>I'm saying it's the latest iteration of the finetuned model mentioned in the parent comment.<p>I'm also not suggesting that it's "the latest and greatest" anything. In fact, I think it's rather clear that I'm suggesting the opposite? As in - how can a small fine tune produce better results than a frontier lab's work?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2026 11:27:26 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47750523</link><dc:creator>anana_</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47750523</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47750523</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by anana_ in "I ran Gemma 4 as a local model in Codex CLI"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It's rather surprising that a solo dev can squeeze more performance out of a model with rather humble resources vs a frontier lab. I'm skeptical of claims that such a fine-tuned model is "better" -- maybe on certain benchmarks, but overall?<p>FYI the latest iteration of that finetune is here: <a href="https://huggingface.co/Jackrong/Qwopus3.5-27B-v3" rel="nofollow">https://huggingface.co/Jackrong/Qwopus3.5-27B-v3</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2026 09:38:45 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47749755</link><dc:creator>anana_</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47749755</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47749755</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by anana_ in "I run multiple $10K MRR companies on a $20/month tech stack"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Upon rereading, I'd agree. Fits with the tone of the rest of the write up.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2026 10:35:51 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47738136</link><dc:creator>anana_</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47738136</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47738136</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by anana_ in "I run multiple $10K MRR companies on a $20/month tech stack"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> Sometimes you need the absolute cutting-edge reasoning of Claude 3.5 Sonnet or GPT-4o<p>Dead giveaway</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2026 09:23:39 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47737613</link><dc:creator>anana_</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47737613</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47737613</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by anana_ in "Something is afoot in the land of Qwen"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p><a href="https://huggingface.co/Qwen/Qwen3.5-27B" rel="nofollow">https://huggingface.co/Qwen/Qwen3.5-27B</a><p>I wasn't aware of that, which page mentions that?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2026 00:57:24 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47256123</link><dc:creator>anana_</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47256123</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47256123</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by anana_ in "Something is afoot in the land of Qwen"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I've had even better results using the dense 27B model -- less looping and churning on problems</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2026 19:46:59 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47252823</link><dc:creator>anana_</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47252823</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47252823</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by anana_ in "Warren Buffett dumps $1.7B of Amazon stock"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>They own GEICO...</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2026 18:30:03 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47064392</link><dc:creator>anana_</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47064392</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47064392</guid></item></channel></rss>