Isn’t it the case anyway that if you add state, federal, local, property, capital gains, and sales taxes, add the money that you and your employer pays for healthcare, that you’re basically paying slightly more in taxes all-in?

DACA (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deferred_Action_for_Childhood_...) was an exec order specifically because those individuals were brought over (as children, with no agency over their fate) after they were born, not before, so of course they weren’t citizens via the 14th. You’re correct that It wasn’t a law passed by Congress, but it’s irrelevant. I’m not sure what you’re saying, talking anything about DACA in this context is irrelevant.

But I wouldn't exactly call "professionals trying to make high brow media" exclusive alternative to Reddit, Youtube, Twitter, TikTok.

A lot of the propaganda (and sane washing) is coming from mass media, too. I feel like the only "legit" media outlets are like Reuters, AP, and some international ones, I guess.

- The consolidation of media (& social media in general) is about making money from outrage (emotions)

- Anti Vax (& other) movements is about people only receptive to people saying what they already feel (feelings)

- Accountability is gone because people care about being on the winning team and being "right".

Reason, Logic, and Evidence seems completely replaced by propaganda and mistrust of experts (fueled by the propaganda), but it's all rooted in comfort in people's own emotional validation.

The authors thesis seems to be that it's preferable to rely on the programmer who wrote bugs to write even more bugs in tests in order to have some benefit over a compiler or type system that can prevent these things from happening in the first place?

So obviously it's an opinion and he's entitled to it, but (in my own opinion) it is so so so, on-its-face, just flat out wrong, I'm concerned that that it's creating developers who believe that writing so many tests (that languages and compilers save you time (and bugs) in writing) is a valid solution to preventing null pointer defeferences.

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46887665

Points: 46

# Comments: 68

The actual videos do not support this conclusion at all. You’re being lied to.

Systems must be _structurally architected_ with security in mind.

Security is layered, using a random key with 128-bit space makes guessing UUIDs infeasible. But _also_ you should be doing AuthZ on the records, and also you should be doing rate limiting on API so they can't be brute forced, either.

Any recommendations?

At least President Dwayne Elizondo Mountain Dew Herbert Camacho cared about things enough to make things better for his people, hired the smartest person he knew and genuinely tried to fix things.

I replaced the tidbyts with a Dakboard, specifically a https://shop.dakboard.com/products/pixeltoptech

Yes, this right here. It should work like a phone number where you can take it from provider to provider. You setup your gateway with your IPv6 prefix and then go.

Problem is all the technical and non-technical stuff to actually make that work.

- Verifying ownership of the prefix (rPKI or IRRs) and which ASNs are allowed to advertise it.

- Limiting allocations to someone? I guess phones solve this with SIMs

- Getting your ISP to route the traffic to your device

- Getting the device to announce it with RAs

- Dealing with asymmetric return routing over a slow "path" since it could be multi-homed

- Dealing with routing aggregation since IPv6 routing tables would explode with all the /56s in there

Maybe bring back Mobile IPv6? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mobile_IP

The republic is in mortal peril because of your attitude

I hope it’s contagious.