Unless Apple is straight up lying about their technology and encryption methods used to secure iCloud and their hardware, the issue of a public standoff is moot, because Apple couldn't help them if they wanted to. And while perhaps it's possible that Apple would lie to consumers to please US law enforcement, it's a bit of a stretch to say that because there haven't been any high-profile cases where law enforcement tries to force Apple to give up what they don't have, that this must be evidence that they're in cahoots.

We’re on a mission to transform the automotive service experience in Malaysia. As a funded and profitable startup, we’re in the early stages of scaling and are looking to hire our first engineers to help build purpose-driven software for MSMEs in the automotive service industry.

We’re currently hiring experienced candidates for the following roles:

- Android Engineers

- Frontend (React) Engineers

- Full Stack Engineers

Salary: RM6,000 - RM18,000/mo, based on experience and proficiency Tech Stack: Kotlin, Go, React, PostgreSQL, GCP

We offer flexible work arrangements, competitive pay, and a human-first work environment.

To apply or learn more, email andrew@pitstop.my with "hn" in the subject line.

There are some things I miss about Safari, but the search bar behavior is not one of them.

In spite of that, the collective is enough to dominate a kitchen or farm or jungle many orders of magnitude larger. It knows to attack an intruder. It can give a hairless ape with years of training and three layers of protective equipment a really hard time. Hell, it can make a stir in that apex predator's society by reputation alone.

Maybe I find the magnificent result of their cooperation inspiring in its implications for humanity and the greater galaxy. Maybe I'm just a weird nerd that knows what supervillain theme I would pick if this computer stuff doesn't work out.

I wasn't aware that the NYT was considered equivalently and oppositely biased. The articles I have read have not put up any red flags for me, but I'm not closed off to the possibility that I've missed the signs or haven't read the right articles. Hence my question.

I take it you think virtually all their reporting is sufficiently biased so as not to be considered trustworthy?

If anything, he debunked his own theory with that experiment.

That really hit home. Sometimes there really are no-win scenarios. Absolutely tragic that these sites are lost, but there's no practical solution to preserve them.