<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: anoneng</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=anoneng</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2026 23:11:41 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=anoneng" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by anoneng in "OpenBSD has a use-after-free allowing local privilege escalation to root"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Not necessarily. Rust safety relies on OS primitives and the error here is in an OS primitive itself (kernel semaphores).<p>Yes Rust is one language that can be widely deployed in systems programming and potentially avoid classes of memory and ownership errors. No it doesn’t magically solve all the problems. Saying “Rust would fix this” in a hypothetical situation where Rust existed in 1995 or OpenBSD was rewritten from scratch, ok, well maybe. As of today only research kernels and a very small fraction of Linux systems have been written in Rust when we are talking about kernels.<p>People without systems and embedded programming experience need to sit down.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2026 15:45:24 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48833465</link><dc:creator>anoneng</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48833465</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48833465</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by anoneng in "OpenBSD has a use-after-free allowing local privilege escalation to root"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Tell us you know nothing about kernel programming and trust stacks while you are at it.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2026 15:37:37 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48833379</link><dc:creator>anoneng</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48833379</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48833379</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by anoneng in "How to sequence your own DNA at home"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Much like many cameras process and discard the RAW sensor data after processing to pixel data if not further compressing and discarding the processed pixel data to a lossy image format, even more so the raw BAM sequencing read data is vastly larger than processed VCF files. Even many companies that retain that data are liable to archive it offline rather than keep the raw reads permanently accessible online. There are real costs involved and a business case is needed for keeping that data. Especially with a decent privacy policy or regulations storing 100G or multiples of that online for free and downloading on demand is a significant compared to the entire cost of sequencing.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2026 16:26:40 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48820051</link><dc:creator>anoneng</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48820051</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48820051</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by anoneng in "98% isn't much"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The whole premise of the article is fallacious analogies and mixed metaphors.<p>Yes a restaurant that poisons 2% of its customers is a bad restaurant. A restaurant that has nothing for people who are strict kosher, strict halal, strict vegan, or have severe multiple food allergies is not a bad restaurant. There may be 5% of people who simply can’t eat there because the kitchen cooks pork and there’s peanut shells on the ground but their idiosyncratic requirements don’t dictate the experience of the other 95%. Or 90%, or what have you.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2026 15:25:36 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48819133</link><dc:creator>anoneng</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48819133</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48819133</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by anoneng in "98% isn't much"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I love lynx as much as anyone but it is ludicrous to expect webapp developers to support no script and no CSS.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2026 15:21:09 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48819077</link><dc:creator>anoneng</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48819077</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48819077</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by anoneng in "98% Isn't Much"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Right. That problem is bloat, not lack of legacy support. Adding (already bloated) legacy support to already bloated software just makes bloat worse.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2026 15:17:56 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48819035</link><dc:creator>anoneng</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48819035</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48819035</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by anoneng in "98% isn't much"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>This goes to show you’ve never been anywhere near the actual development cycle of a real-world front-end web application. “So, there is a baseline "target subset of HTML/CSS" that gives you 100% coverage.” Oh really? Which subset? Which “HTML/CSS?” And 100%? Absolutely laughable.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2026 15:12:35 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48818956</link><dc:creator>anoneng</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48818956</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48818956</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by anoneng in "98% isn't much"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Seems like you’re getting hate but this is how the world works. Uber just has to support the devices that their market uses. And especially for visas the government is free to make the public bend to whatever arbitrary requirements they develop for using their byzantine systems.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2026 15:08:41 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48818903</link><dc:creator>anoneng</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48818903</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48818903</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by anoneng in "Twenty One Zero-Days in FFmpeg"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I would say it’s the opposite. coreutils is core utils, you cannot write shell scripts without them, they are widely and almost unavoidably used in trusted environments. They are also relatively simple.<p>With ffmpeg, anyone who knows anything about secure application development in the past 20 years knows that it is a huge security tarpit and throwing it untrusted inputs in trusted environment is asking to be owned. You thoroughly sandbox that shit. That’s true for all untrusted media conversion, but absolutely with ffmpeg.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2026 11:24:28 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48516122</link><dc:creator>anoneng</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48516122</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48516122</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by anoneng in "Cloudflare to cut about 20% of its workforce"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>SpaceX has nothing to do with any part of the Artemis II crewed lunar fly-by. They were considered and rejected. It was entirely legacy aerospace contractors. SpaceX is under contract for parts of future missions including the lunar lander.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2026 08:36:52 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48060349</link><dc:creator>anoneng</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48060349</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48060349</guid></item></channel></rss>