<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: anuraggoel</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=anuraggoel</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 07:38:07 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=anuraggoel" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by anuraggoel in "The Zen of HN"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>You could add something to the effect of 'say nothing you wouldn't say to our face'.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 16:55:01 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=669063</link><dc:creator>anuraggoel</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=669063</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=669063</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by anuraggoel in "Starting Up, One Year Later: The Downward Spiral"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> Mostly only people wound as tightly as me<p>Isn't that demographic also your target audience for this post?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 09:41:31 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=667288</link><dc:creator>anuraggoel</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=667288</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=667288</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by anuraggoel in "Customers given too many choices are 10x less likely to buy"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Fair point, but isn't the jam example also a product aisle  with 24 varieties of jam? My current frontpage recommendations include around 15 laptops and 15 books - I can't possibly buy all of them - aren't they asking me to choose? If they showed me just three from each product category, and fewer categories overall, I might actually be interested in the recommendations.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 04:38:21 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=667125</link><dc:creator>anuraggoel</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=667125</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=667125</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by anuraggoel in "Customers given too many choices are 10x less likely to buy"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>This sounds reasonable. But I've always wondered about Amazon.com's UI strategy in the context of choice - they always show me much more crap than I am interested in: on the home page, on search result pages, on product detail pages, pretty much everywhere on their site. Right now I can see well over 30 'recommended' items on their homepage (and this is <i>after</i> the huge Kindle ad). Surely they've conducted A/B tests. Why don't they see the same results?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 04:27:35 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=667112</link><dc:creator>anuraggoel</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=667112</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=667112</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by anuraggoel in "Updated YC Company Hosting Stats"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Why did you switch to Rackspace?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 19:35:40 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=660742</link><dc:creator>anuraggoel</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=660742</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=660742</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by anuraggoel in "Celery: A Distributed Task Queue for Django"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I might not want to swap out Django with CGI, but I might want to use RabbitMQ-based distributed tasks in Pylons. Seems like a waste to write all that code from scratch. For Django users (and I am one), Celery is clearly useful. But a distributed task processing library, even if it is a thin wrapper over RabbitMQ, should not depend on a web-framework.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 17:54:19 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=655078</link><dc:creator>anuraggoel</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=655078</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=655078</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by anuraggoel in "Celery: A Distributed Task Queue for Django"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Looks interesting. But shouldn't a library like celery work outside the context of a web framework? I don't see a reason to call this a distributed task queue 'for Django' specifically, except for the dependencies on Django's ORM and settings definitions. Swapping out Django's ORM with SQLAlchemy (or DB-API) would make this project much more useful.<p>See pp (<a href="http://www.parallelpython.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.parallelpython.com/</a>) for something similar, without the django dependency. More parallel processing goodies at <a href="http://wiki.python.org/moin/ParallelProcessing" rel="nofollow">http://wiki.python.org/moin/ParallelProcessing</a>.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 16:57:10 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=654964</link><dc:creator>anuraggoel</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=654964</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=654964</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by anuraggoel in "Scribd on the front page of BusinessWeek.com"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>On WSJ.com too: <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124475525754407679.html#mod=testMod" rel="nofollow">http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124475525754407679.html#mod=...</a><p>It looks like Scribd is building a reader for the iPhone, and this app will also allow searching within Simon & Shuster <i>pbooks</i>. This is interesting because it sounds similar to what you can do with Google Books, though on a much smaller scale.<p>Also from the WSJ article, Scribd's PDFs can be read on the Sony Reader but not on the Kindle DX - which means they've probably adopted Adobe's DRM. Are we going to see DRM-free paid content from Scribd at some point?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 23:53:49 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=653893</link><dc:creator>anuraggoel</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=653893</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=653893</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by anuraggoel in "Mapping Out Your Web Startup"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Great list. I would also add a box for 'Core Values'. It might help, for instance, in computing a more accurate valuation of 'Fear' as a trade object.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 09:13:51 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=634569</link><dc:creator>anuraggoel</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=634569</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=634569</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by anuraggoel in "Curing Python's Neglect"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p><a href="http://docs.python.org/library/constants.html#exit" rel="nofollow">http://docs.python.org/library/constants.html#exit</a><p>In CPython, exit is actually an object of type site.Quitter (the actual class is implementation dependent). site.Quitter overrides the __repr__ special method (which is called by the interpreter on any expression typed in the shell to print the result). site.Quitter also overrides the __call__ special method, so when an object of type site.Quitter is called, the overridden __call__ method invokes system exit.<p><pre><code>   >>> exit_class = type(exit) #gets a reference to the class
   >>> my_exit = exit_class('bye') #the arg is used to print the message
   >>> my_exit
   Use bye() or Ctrl-D (i.e. EOF) to exit
   >>> my_exit()
   <python shell exits>
</code></pre>
Minor inconsistency: typing "bye()" doesn't work so technically the message is incorrect. But I suppose they don't want you to be hacking exit() in the first place.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 08:14:13 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=633414</link><dc:creator>anuraggoel</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=633414</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=633414</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by anuraggoel in "Bing"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>They explicitly state they don't use SearchWiki to influence ranking right now.<p>From <a href="http://googlesystem.blogspot.com/2008/11/google-searchwiki-launched.html" rel="nofollow">http://googlesystem.blogspot.com/2008/11/google-searchwiki-l...</a>:<p><i>"At this time we aren't using SearchWiki to influence ranking but it is easy to see how that could happen in the future," says Marissa Mayer.</i><p>I suppose they are going to wait until they get a meaningful amount of user data before they start using it.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 19:21:50 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=630868</link><dc:creator>anuraggoel</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=630868</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=630868</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by anuraggoel in "Bing"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Xmarks search is indeed a cool concept (much like delicious search), but I don't bookmark everything useful I find on the web - so bookmark-based search will never be quite as comprehensive.<p>In a way, search engines already account for up-modding by factoring in which links you click on when you are given a page of search results. But you are more likely to  click on results already at the top, so I wouldn't give too much weight to that information.<p>The SearchWiki concept has a lot of potential if Google decides to go down that path though.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 19:16:36 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=630856</link><dc:creator>anuraggoel</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=630856</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=630856</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by anuraggoel in "Bing"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>A user's SearchWiki rankings do not influence other users' search results. Yet. Till that happens, it's not really HN-style modding.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 18:47:00 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=630791</link><dc:creator>anuraggoel</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=630791</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=630791</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by anuraggoel in "Plastic Logic: Like Kindle, but Thin like iPhone."]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Actually, Plastic Logic first started marketing this reader in fall 2008. Makes you wonder.<p><a href="http://www.mobileread.com/forums/showthread.php?t=29020" rel="nofollow">http://www.mobileread.com/forums/showthread.php?t=29020</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 04:08:02 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=629740</link><dc:creator>anuraggoel</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=629740</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=629740</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[Line-profiler: line-level profiling for python]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="http://packages.python.org/line_profiler/">http://packages.python.org/line_profiler/</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=628849">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=628849</a></p>
<p>Points: 26</p>
<p># Comments: 1</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 18:02:40 +0000</pubDate><link>http://packages.python.org/line_profiler/</link><dc:creator>anuraggoel</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=628849</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=628849</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by anuraggoel in "Topsy Search Launches: ReTweets Are The New Currency Of The Web"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>While its a nifty service, Topsy seems to be 'static' search for Twitter - another version of "<search terms> site:twitter.com" (especially when you consider Google's time-range search options). A lot of people seem to be linking to tweets on blogs and forums, and the 'old-fashioned' currency of these links seems to be missing in Topsy (and present in the Google version). This omission could be an issue for their ranking algos when linking to tweets becomes more common.<p>If I were the Topsy team, I would also worry about Twitter adding a static option to their own search. Unless of course I am hoping to go the Summize route.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 03:18:10 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=627927</link><dc:creator>anuraggoel</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=627927</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=627927</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[Benchmarking BDB, CDB and Tokyo Cabinet on large datasets]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="http://www.dmo.ca/blog/benchmarking-hash-databases-on-large-data/">http://www.dmo.ca/blog/benchmarking-hash-databases-on-large-data/</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=622350">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=622350</a></p>
<p>Points: 41</p>
<p># Comments: 22</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 17:06:06 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.dmo.ca/blog/benchmarking-hash-databases-on-large-data/</link><dc:creator>anuraggoel</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=622350</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=622350</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[The Publisher as a Digital Concierge]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="http://personanondata.blogspot.com/2009/05/digital-concierge.html">http://personanondata.blogspot.com/2009/05/digital-concierge.html</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=620793">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=620793</a></p>
<p>Points: 1</p>
<p># Comments: 0</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 17:38:33 +0000</pubDate><link>http://personanondata.blogspot.com/2009/05/digital-concierge.html</link><dc:creator>anuraggoel</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=620793</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=620793</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by anuraggoel in "Scribd Invites Writers to Upload Work and Name Their Price"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Amazon pays Kindle authors/publishers 35% of the list price (which is set by the content owner). The <i>retail</i> price is set by Amazon. Scribd's margins are clearly more lucrative. Smashwords (<a href="http://www.smashwords.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.smashwords.com</a>) operates a similar model and pays out 85%. I think this is a great move - high traffic alternatives to Amazon can only be good for the self-publishing ecosystem.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 03:39:25 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=614337</link><dc:creator>anuraggoel</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=614337</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=614337</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[An Open Letter To Newspaper Publishers]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="http://broadcast.oreilly.com/2009/05/an-open-letter-to-newspaper-pu.html">http://broadcast.oreilly.com/2009/05/an-open-letter-to-newspaper-pu.html</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=601536">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=601536</a></p>
<p>Points: 1</p>
<p># Comments: 0</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 22:47:55 +0000</pubDate><link>http://broadcast.oreilly.com/2009/05/an-open-letter-to-newspaper-pu.html</link><dc:creator>anuraggoel</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=601536</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=601536</guid></item></channel></rss>