lmao

what would be the difference between not reasoning and reasoning not like a human?

I personally don't think the weight efficiency will improve that much; if anything big does happen, I expect it to be about scalable architectures and continual learning

surprised it isn't a bigger thing, eg artificial analysis doesn't report anything like that

still doesn't measure the human-agent interaction part, but that's pure vibes atp

I think any security-related task triggers it to think about the threat model and thus hit the guardrails

eg I'd throw a hypothesis at it in the evening, and overnight it would write the code, do a sanity check, start a run, monitor the metrics, identify and fix a bug, propose a new hypothesis based on the results, write the code and start the second experiment, etc

still not that good at generating ideas or drawing conclusions, but much better at criticism than opus

even the api price is not that expensive for this

> We shouldn't look at this and think

you're gonna tell me what to think now?

well, they do? it's a win-win, you can't really criticise an AI lab for doing AI instead of straight up giving money to security researchers

> If you factor in all the money spent on training

why would I? it's not a cybersec-specific model

> golf courses are a traditional green space where people in a community

I have a feeling those two sets of communities are disjoint