I am using KVM from Cloudcone (their virtualization software was hacked about a week ago) and I am using RPI4.

Then I need to set up my old website again, which is a pain in the butt. I hard-coded cron and a git-based auto-deployment feature (I think).

I primarily worked on PoC/MVP development where I worked to bring ideas to something barely tangible. And Heroku's free tier decisions meant it was a barrier for developers to develop on their platform. Pay first, develop later. It was like the rest of the industry.

After that, I just exited containerized platform-based application development entirely because convenience and having that weird developer philosophy "I must not pay because I can find a way" was less of a reason than sustainability. For me, containerized application platforms was about POC and MVP. If there was growth then me or the client can pay for the convenience. But if there was nothing, pretty easy to delete the project.

Then I committed to replicating the Heroku experience with a small VPS, backing up via rsync, and moving from PostgreSQL to SQLite. I can even charge clients for hosting (+ maintenance) on my VPS.

I do not know, to me containerized application platforms are limited by commercial challenges rather than technical ones. I see tons of containerised application platforms, but the trust has eroded because of a single company.

I have changed my development facility and laid the groundwork to not commit to these platforms. Sustainability over convenience.

Sure, I understand and respect folks at fly.io, render, railway, and even the open source variants of these companies (Caddy etc.). But there is no sustainability guarantee for these platforms. It was not just about the "free tier", to me it transcends to a philosophical point about building applications in general. Sure, there could be a new era with AI making MVP/PoC development easy through hosting in containerised applications, but that is a tangent point.

If Heroku were doing everything right, there would not be a dozen application platforms out there, but they made mistakes and, in my opinion, made the entire containerised application platform model untrustworthy.

There are only 46 countries listed there. I am not intending to be critical of the idea, but having contact information of government institutions is not an effective way to get things done, in my opinion. And most government websites and contact details are quite accessible because they are centrally built through national IT system and a unified software service (usually). In third and second world country the contact details is usually quite useless. You have to find the right person and sit in front of their office.

The issue with the government contact repository is that it does not connect 'I have this problem' and 'who do I reach out to'. From my experience, you have to invest time in doing research and finding out who to reach out to.

  - Afrikaans
  - Albanian
  - Arabic
  - Armenian
  - Azerbaijani
  - Basque
  - Bengali
  - Bulgarian
  - Burmese (Myanmar)
  - Catalan
  - Cebuano
  - Chinese (Simplified)
  - Chinese (Traditional)
  - Croatian
  - Czech
  - Danish
  - Dutch
  - English
  - Estonian
  - Filipino
  - Finnish
  - French (Canada)
  - French (European)
  - Galician
  - Georgian
  - German
  - Greek
  - Gujarati
  - Haitian Creole
  - Hebrew
  - Hindi
  - Hungarian
  - Icelandic
  - Indonesian
  - Italian
  - Japanese
  - Javanese
  - Kannada
  - Konkani
  - Korean
  - Latin
  - Latvian
  - Lithuanian
  - Macedonian
  - Maithili
  - Malay
  - Malayalam
  - Marathi
  - Nepali
  - Norwegian (Bokmål)
  - Norwegian (Nynorsk)
  - Oriya
  - Pashto
  - Persian
  - Polish
  - Portuguese (Brazil)
  - Portuguese (Portugal)
  - Punjabi
  - Romanian
  - Russian
  - Serbian (Cyrillic)
  - Sindhi
  - Sinhala
  - Slovak
  - Slovenian
  - Spanish (European)
  - Spanish (Latin America)
  - Spanish (Mexico)
  - Swahili
  - Swedish
  - Tamil
  - Telugu
  - Thai
  - Turkish
  - Ukrainian
  - Urdu
  - Vietnamese

In fact, they should have done that a decade a ago.

Mozilla has been around since the late '90s and should have evolved beyond just being a browser company. They launched a VPN service when VPNs were already everywhere, and they did the same with a bookmark manager when others were already offering similar solutions. Mozilla is always catching up, never leading, and that's a common issue with many big open-source and free software companies. They often pretend to be a business that isn't heavily propped up by big tech donations.

If I were leading a browser company, my focus would have been aggressively directed towards small business software. I’d create an internet and privacy-focused affordable minimal business software suite that lives within the browser — a combination of Proton and Zoho. And I’d strongly avoid building things that should be browser extensions.

I haven't worked on these types of projects for nearly two years now. Folks I know use Retool or Softr with an API connectivity platform like Portable, Pipedream, or Zapier. If you're staring at a spreadsheet on a daily basis, the next step should be looking into an app builder combined with an API connection platform.

I sincerely commend the enthusiasm, but working in the industry as the "excel expert", I think most outsider does not understand the "cult" aspect of Excel.

Excel works. That is it.

Trying to replace excel with anything will be percieved as replacing a calculator with some alien substance that does math. Excel is like Pencil and Pen. You can not replace it.

Excel is not software it is a tool.

I have had my fair share backlash when trying to introduce replacement and complimentary tools. To replace excel, you not only need to advocate for it's usefulness and you need to be also be liable to the complaints from excel users. If anything goes wrong no how minor with the new tool, you are the one who introduced all these mess.

So, in practice what usually happens is that, when people hit UX challenges they go to a consulting firm and commission a backoffice software to address the Excel limitations. Some business may pay for nocode but that is very rare. They go to backoffice software firm and they build a CRUD software that is now not replacing Excel but compliments it.

Zuck is not a solo founder at all but what happened to the rest of the guys. Some says Google is what it is today was largely due to Eric Schimdt's involvement who is not a founder. The idea that all co-founders hold large influence in the long run of the company is not true. However, there individuals who essentially established the culture, the vision and the framework of the company.

The idea is that within the original or pivotal executive board there are people who even though left the company still holds significant influence in terms of grand strategy or vision. And those people does not include all cofounders.

Since the dawn of torrenting (and to some extent the the Silicon Valley TV show) many folks tried to launch a P2P resource pool platform. The challenge is that small amount of money being distributed to a large pool is challenging. Then there is the issue of stability. Do you penalize hoster who fail to provide a stable service?

Hosters must have "trust" in the system and platform can only afford to pay out only when the payable amount to hosters reach a certain threshold. Like you can't withdraw unless you have about $100 charged invoices.

And that is where I see the concept of crypto tokens appear because trust as a short term mechanism can be consoled via crypto tokens.

Engineering an service to take advantage of idle resources is a non-trivial task specially if the service is hooked up to doing something dedicated. For the hosters energy is not cheap, maintenance is a hassle and guranteeing stability is a pain.

I would love to learn how you would address these issues.

If you convince yourself you don't have to always write or participate or give a hot take, you will find yourself to be generally positive and more constructive and factual.

Any platform you enjoy has ALWAYS been a result of everyones kindness and politeness. Any platform that encourages impulsive behavior is not a good platform for your mental health or others. People are never impulsively positive. Even when a platform have a general thematic negative tendency towards something, avoiding negative interaction in general is the best course. Even if you can't be always positive , you can atleast be constructive, neutral and factual. At the end of the day, a good community consists friends and if you want to be part of the community, you have to make friends there.

Many residential proxy and scraping experts are pretty active on LinkedIn. But they do not talk about scraping data, just news around web scraping.