<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: appyn</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=appyn</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2026 02:09:15 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=appyn" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by appyn in "Everyone says assembly is untyped—everyone is wrong"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>This syntax is far too simple and won't adequately capture semantics for some architectures, for example Hexagon with its packeted instructions or SHARC with its complex parallel instructions.<p>One can already see how this syntax isn't up to the task by the decision to put x86 prefixes on a separate line. The author tries to justify it but this comes across as trying to excuse a poor design decision.<p>Also the AI slop tone of this article is awfully grating. I nearly gave up reading it because the LLM editing artefacts were so jarring.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2026 08:01:29 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49397622</link><dc:creator>appyn</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49397622</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49397622</guid></item></channel></rss>