<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: aptly_yclept</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=aptly_yclept</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 03:42:48 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=aptly_yclept" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by aptly_yclept in "Points are a weird and inconsistent unit of measure"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>To expand on what the previous said, here's a link to a seminal paper on pixels - "A pixel is not a little square" by Alvy Ray Smith. <a href="https://alvyray.com/Memos/CG/Microsoft/6_pixel.pdf" rel="nofollow">https://alvyray.com/Memos/CG/Microsoft/6_pixel.pdf</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2026 18:43:56 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48171928</link><dc:creator>aptly_yclept</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48171928</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48171928</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by aptly_yclept in "The Rise and Fall of the Powdered Wig (2020)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It would be practical in strong wind.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2025 05:07:35 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45632171</link><dc:creator>aptly_yclept</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45632171</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45632171</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by aptly_yclept in "Show HN: The text disappears when you screenshot it"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>There's an analogue method too - just do a very long exposure of a busy street. There is so little reflected light from people (relatively speaking) that it barely registers on the film/sensor, hence they are 'invisible' in the final shot. That's why old street photos are sometimes empty of people, because both lenses and film were slow, leading to long exposures.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2025 12:30:19 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45300909</link><dc:creator>aptly_yclept</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45300909</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45300909</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by aptly_yclept in "The history of 'OK' (2023)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>That's interesting to me, for I (a non-native speaker) am well familiar with the word 'cagey' from  more contemporary movies and books. The dictionaries I checked list etymology as unknown, however. I'll see if I can't ask one about the "K.G." hypothesis.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2024 04:52:21 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40315588</link><dc:creator>aptly_yclept</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40315588</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40315588</guid></item></channel></rss>