So, I am going to say a bunch of things that helped me. The challenge is that maybe they will not seem helpful from exactly where they are, because they may be two or three steps ahead of exactly what you need. But, if the stuff resonates, let me know and I will be happy to give more details over the email. The most important point is, there is a way out. And there is a lot of resources out there to help you to find the way out. But you need to take ownership over it. In the way that works for you. Which is catch-22 right now because you are overwhelmed. But maybe something below will help you to find a direction you can move in and then you add the rest.

=================================

Psychiatrists do not make you better. They get you back to the societal mean. At best. Psychologists may or may not make you better. Actually, they do not make you better. They walk along with you as you make yourself better. They are "the tool" not "the leader". Which opens up a question of whether they are the right tool. I looked at maybe 30 different psychological approaches trying to figure out which one was for me. And, nearly accidentally, discovered John Rowan, who wrote a lot of books on therapy, personal growth, etc. And deep in one of the books, there was a table which split personal positions and therapies into four categories (columns). The table blew my mind. I think it was in the book Personification (ISBN: 9780415433464).

It says that people may be in one of four major places. In first column, they may identify and judge themselves against society and its norms. That's where psychiatrists and psychological approaches like CBT work.

In second column, they want to redefine themselves (I want to be the kind of person who does X - e.g. cooks fancy dishes). So, they have internal resourcing and internal guidance. Gestalt therapy works in there.

In third column, they believe not in society but in external entity. God, angels, tarot, etc. Jungian approach resonates for those people, but so does Tantra, etc.

And, in fourth column, there is non-dual people. Taoism, some Buddhism (Dharmakaya, not Nirmanakaya).

The point is. Do you know which of these are you? I am column 2. And when I understood that, it became easier to see when something was aligned to my solution path and when something was "trying to help" but was using a terminology that was very misaligned to my internal process.

I am guessing your definition of self was coming from your partner before. And now you are still aching for that definition, but it is not available. So, you have roughly four options: 1) Find another source of definition of you, given to you by external sources. New partner, workaholism, group that will gladly take all of your time. That's column 1 solution. 2) Decide to figure out who "you" are. Basically, The Ship of Theseus approach. Decide that "I am the kind of person who is .... (great home chef)" and then do whatever is needed to become that. That's a lot of soul searching. And a lot of scaffolding building. I am doing this right now. I found Existential Therapy approach helpful to think through that. I found Sara Kuburic's book (It's on me, ISBN: 9780593449264) surprisingly good overview for that, as I prefer to do deep work myself. Victor Frankl is existentialist, but I did not find his book that useful, I think the therapy modality that is built on top of philosophy is way more relevant. 3) Decide to lean on external non-societal authority (column 3). Go find a Pegan group, start looking at Astrology, wake up your kundalini snakes, etc. Maybe it will resonate, maybe it will not. 4) Go all Tao or Zen or "it is what it is".

There is a little bit of a cheat. A lot of healing work happens in column 3 spaces. But you need to either resonate with them or find a translation layer to be able to participate. I've been building the later for myself, but it is even more work. Worth it, though.

=============================

You do not know yourself, yet. You need to build your interoception. You need to ask yourself a question of "is this interesting to me" and being able to feel the answer. This may feel strange but it is totally doable. You can start by trying to assign numbers to your anxiety strength on any particular day (I have 1-10 scale with breath stop at 11), but it can get way more nuanced. And the deeper you go into interoception, the more clarity you get. Meditation is one (long) way to go there. But, something like Gendlin's focusing is another. There are some groups online that practice Focusing, some even for free.

Also, Authentic Relating, Circling of various kinds, Ann Weiser Conrell free mini-courses, etc. You could be busy online "present" with people every day of the week.

=============================

You may need to grieve. Or some sort of cathartic release anyway. Again, a bunch of ways to do that, you just need to search for them. Sometimes in weird places. Ecstatic Dances are one way people do that (5Rhythms, etc). Holotropic Breathwork is another. Some online breathing groups, too. Look for groups that are present somehow "as they are", often with music.

=============================

You may need to rebuild social skills and/or play test different personas. Improv is amazing for that. I know a bunch of people with depression or anxiety growing and chilling-out through Improv. That also gives you community. And quite valuable skills (hearing what people actually say; or, on advanced levels, what they don't say). It is a lot more than what it promises on the tin.

=============================

Journaling, especially writing things by hand is very useful. Could be morning pages, could be Progoff's Intensive Journal, could be deep chat with LLM. The reason it works is because when you just think those thoughts, your mind compresses a lot of little steps or even skips them. It runs right past the open doors. When you write them out line by line, your brain both reads what is written and - importantly - stops holding on those thoughts too much, because it trusts the external capture. Even if you then burn that peace of paper.

=============================

I did not touch sexuality and sensuality. Not for this site. But, let's just say, there is a lot out there as well, of all kinds. Not just Tantra.

=============================

There is more. Lots more. A bunch of that is in old books from 1970s on archive.org for free. Bunch of it is kind of 303 or 404 level, you need to get 101 sorted first before you understand the concepts. Rituals, liminal spaces, positive effects of placebo, proximate zone of development, the rabbit hole can go very deep. And, it all can be healing when you have sufficient scaffolding for it. The scaffolding is the key, you need to build it for yourself.

The overall point is, there are many paths forward. You are on a threshold of starting to walk one or more of them (Asking HN is a sign that you are getting ready). Don't see "right now" as a terrible time. See it as an opportunity to figure out who YOU really are, and get that solidified before the next relationship. It is hard work, but it is worthwhile work. I did not do that around your age, and I am back at the ground work point again. I can't stress this point hard enough.

First, you will stop being afraid to say the wrong thing. Then, you will start to hear the important part in what they said. Then, you will start to hear the part they did NOT say or super-interesting bit they skimmed over because it is not interesting to them FINALLY (at least so far for me and with other training), you will start feeling the tension in the conversation, the good time to interrupt and the time to pivot the topic.

Think Dreyfus model of skill acquisition, but in a free-to-fail environment. This, incidentally, may be the reason why I LIKE when there is low audience for the shows I do. Because, then it is really just my personal/group practice.

Something like this maybe, doing the virtual instruments (VST/VSTI) review for saxophone: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43909398

So, it was not just the voice, but the quality control pipeline that was missing as well.

Maybe it mostly works for old plain text books, but if nobody is checking.....

When the foreign movies started to filter into the Soviet Union's illegal movie theatres, you would get 3 or 4 movies playing at once in one room. There would be a TV in each corner of the room and 4 or 5 rows of plastic chairs in front of it in an arch.

ALL of the movies were being revoiced by the same person. So, if you were sitting in the back of the 5th row, you were potentially getting the sound from an action movie, a comedy, a horror movie and a romance at the same time. In the same voice.

You learned to filter really well. So, if that's what they were trained on, watching a single movie must have been very relaxing.

Since they have a full sound engine built-in as well, I suspect they deal with attenuation, et al correctly.

I don't have ADHD (or think I do not anyway), but my wife (late 30s) has been diagnosed as an adult and started taking Vyvanse six months ago.

This is fast acting, slow release, non-accumulative medecine. Her doze kicks in within 20 minutes and slowly tapers off over the day. There is probably some minor residual effect crossing into the second day, mostly because if she takes it for many days stright, she needs a day or two break.

Her taking Vyvance saved our marriage and she is feels that the person she was before taking Vyvance is "gone". The day she took the first doze, she wrote about 20 pages of notes of what was different. Off-pill, she could not write 20 pages on demand, online in full hyper-focus mode. The pill is less effective now, but it sure still makes a difference.

I think having "on pill" and "off pill" perspective on the same issue by the "same person"(you/her) can help break a lot of bad patterns where the person thinks their position is the only valid one. Suddenly, they get a range of options from the "inside of their head". It also allows her to still have access to traditional creative ADHD super-powers (off-pill days) but then balance it with productivity of on-pill days.

As an anecdote. Before the pill if we would walk up to a traffic light blinking green with 20 seconds left - she would refuse to cross. Just too worried about not having enough time. Probably not ADHD itself, but one of co-morbidities. But also maybe not having enough focus to make a snap decision. On pill, she will cross with 5 seconds left. Because she has the focus and the drive.

As another anecdote. Our arguments/negotations (pre-pill) would be like floating on a stormy sea, always changing direction and shape of the argument. And even if we reached a conclusion, it would only be about the very last point discussed, ignoring the journey. The first serious discussion "on the pill" felt not that dissimilar, but at the end she turned to me and said "So we discussed these 6 things (named 1, named 2, ...) and agreed on X". I was blown away, as I was very used to the old ways.

Books I found more helpful than others:

* Melissa Orlov's book about ADHD and marriage: https://archive.org/details/adhdeffectonmarr0000orlo * https://www.amazon.ca/ADHD-2-0-Essential-Strategies-Distract... - this one, among other good bits, includes a table of all ADHD medecines and their effects, including a comment that off-brand Concerta (I believe) does not actually work

P.s. She also feels that Focus Factor non-prescription pills work partially (she discovered these pre-pill and still uses them on off-pill day). I am reserving an opinion and provide a link purely to clarify the brand, as the name alone gets lots of matches: https://www.focusfactor.com/products/focus-factor-original?v...

Like, if I want to buy something big from Walmart or Costco (to keep to generic shop names) and it does not matter if I am on a train/metro/subway for 10 minutes or 20 minutes, but it totally does matter number of transport switches of bus->subway) and walking is really bad.

So, it would make sense to go to a very distant shop, but that is right opposite the direct train.

Does anything like this exist (for any city really)? The algorithm must be quite similar, but with different graph steps weighted differently depending on method of movement.

I lost half of my hair on that job. Without Ethereal, I am sure I would have lost all of it and a lot more of my sanity too.

The "Next Action" is really just to ensure you know what actually can be done and when and not just have the project (e.g. "Buy car") as the action.

For me, GTD's biggest contribution was the focus on "Next Action". Which was mentioned exactly once in the article. I struggle with the perfect lists and I just can't get the Weekly Review figured out. But looking at some project and figuring out the exact Next Action (and sometimes associated Critical Path) is ridiculously valuable.

I've read a bunch of other productivity books. They have different ideas and approaches, but all of the practical ones seem to have this moment "and figure out the smallest, actionable thing you can actually do on that". But often, that bit is not front and center of the methodology. I suspect in the "3-day master course" for those techniques, they would actually practice such focus. David Allen just really put that front and center, explicitly.

Similarly, the Cognitive Behavior Therapy also uses this "Next Action" idea to get the person to move forward.

In that sense, I felt the article failed to truly look behind the curtain and just focused on a rise and fall of individual movement influencer. I did not see any mention of Lotus Notes (David Allen's own preferred solution), active GTD LinkedIn group, etc.

Specifically, "Robert Smith" needs to say to his superiors that the "quarterly review" was discussed (socialized!) in various stakeholder groups. They already had a previous meeting with a different group and whatever was said there (useful or not) translated into "We've received a lot of positive feedback". After this meeting, they will say "We've received a lot of positive feedback from round-table meetings with 2/3/4/15 groups within the company".

The "same people" group is just playing this game to be visible. If you stay in the company long enough, you can play bingo with what they say, regardless of the specific discussion topic. Don't play this game, if you don't want to. And if you don't know who you are sucking up to (or nobody), you probably don't want to, at least in this particular way.

The real questions, in my opinion, are: 1) Why were you in the meeting at all? If it is "All Staff", then maybe you can skip it (especially if it is recorded for "those not able to be present"). If it is a specific group, then which group (your IT team, group one-above your IT team, etc). Are you a member or a representative of the group? The further away, the less it matters. 2) Are they asking for written feedback, actively? By a specific date? If not, the meeting is not relevant. 3) What is the related timeline (on feedback and on document itself) and where the document goes? That's a question you can totally ask. "Hi, I admit I am not super familiar with the subject. Where does this document goes next? Is there a specific deadline for it?" 4) If you are not there once, does anybody notice? E.g. a direct follow-up for "comments from you or your team?" Have a medical/whatever appointment once and pay attention.

One book you may find interesting is "Political Savvy: Systematic Approaches to Leadership Behind the Scenes Hardcover" by Joel R. DeLuca. It is not a perfect match to the situation, but it certainly helps to think about it in the way that's more aligned with developers' mindset. Unfortunately, it may be hard to get new.

The especially interesting free set is (at least through my library), is a nearly full collection of the Greater Courses, a very high quality educational materials. You can see the official source here: https://www.thegreatcourses.com/courses It is also a good way to find the actual course and then plug it into Kanopy.

Finally, searching Kanopy on the mobile phone app, bookmarking and then switching to TV app to actually watch is an easier workflow than trying to type things in TV interface.

Like dreams, sometimes it is not about the specific activities, but about the infrastructure that is required to make them true.

Reading/Podcasts/Audiobooks (Audible or Libby)/new projects/long walks may help with loneliness. Later, maybe starting a private journal. Lots of suggestions already on that.

In the other direction (being social without guild/doubt about performative-self). You could try going outside of the box in general about that definition of "self". Not in a destructive way, but more in a "who I think I am got me here, try being somebody else and see if that feels better". The feel better (self monitoring) was key for me, as I could not figure out who I was, but I could try a thing and see if it felt right, wrong, or very wrong.

One of those healing discoveries was Improv (improvisational comedy). It feels scary from outside, but the courses (look for courses, not drop-ins) usually start very gentle. The thing that I discovered is that Improv explicitly allowed me to "not be myself" and to experiment with exploring and expressing things without costs associated with doing them for real with "true me". And you do get to meet people who are often quite interesting and accepting. I suspect that they start somewhat accepting and the "Yes and" practice of Improv deepens it.

Similarly, dance classes. The ones that force the rotations, have progressive courses and - in general - reduce your agency. I know, it is counter-intuitive. The point is that you just show up, and (learn to) dance. Not navigate the social rules of negotiating the individual dances. And if one style of dance does not give you the right feeling, try another one. Often, the popular dances (Salsa, Bachata, Reggaeton) are actually not the good community for this purpose as they double (and often are structured to enable) dating. But if you go to offbeat styles (West Coast Swing, Contra, Scottish Country Dancing, Lindy Swing, maybe Rockabilly, etc), they are mostly about community and acceptance.

Finally, I found Esther Perel's "Where do we begin" therapy podcasts very educational and transformational to think about the relationships and self. They are about other people's problems but you get to hear how Esther analyses them and it helps (helped me anyway) to start creating internal system of needs and priorities. This may help with "I know it is dumb thing and I do it anyway", because you keep hearing people explaining completely different failure scenarios and then Esther mapping them to more basic issues of having agency, being valued, etc. So, it helps to think about actual basic needs and then think about different ways those needs could be fulfilled and choosing ones least destructive. Or how to protect your core needs while exploring and expanding.

P.s. Good women/partners totally do exist. The hard part is that they need to be "good for you" and you "good for them". Until you know both what you are "running away from" and "running to", it is hard to evaluate whether there is a good match. Also, a lot of anecdata seems to suggest it takes 2 years in normal circumstances to walk that path from "getting away" to "knowing yourself".

P.p.s. Sorry, lots of quotes, not sure how to summarize it well. And I don't claim to have solve loneliness for myself, but it is nowhere as bad as it was. But if it resonates, feel free to ping.

ES is truly focusing on metrics and things and does have some features to make those use cases easier that Solr would probably need a lot of configuration/customization for.

So, Solr is about search. ES is about a specific set of use cases that rely very heavily on search.

And Lucidworks Fusion (commercial alternative to ES) is about big data and ML and full multi-tool pipeline on top of Solr.