Remembering both Hiragana and Katakana took me no more than a day each. Although I have to admit that I already tried learning them around 5 years ago and gave up back then out of lack of motivation.

Especially, that 120-sided dice are already invented and commercially available.

And Julia docs are also unambigious in stating that code is sometimes interpreted[0]:

> jl_toplevel_eval_flex() then uses some simple heuristics to decide whether to JIT compile the AST or to interpret it directly.

[0] - https://docs.julialang.org/en/v1/devdocs/eval/#Julia-Executi...

I also, personally, never seen a single project written in either Java or C# that distributes aot binaries.

For the same reasons I see languages like Python, Java, C# as inferior.

I was expecting an article about Pi constant or maybe raspberry Pi computer. "My Disappointment Is Immeasurable And My Day Is Ruined!"

You can get it talking about Tiananmen Square event in, like, 2-3 prompts.

[0] - https://programming-language-benchmarks.vercel.app/nim-vs-go

This is not necessarily true. It depends on a language, e.g. Go is slow, Nim[0] is extremely fast with conventional GC and slightly faster with ARC/ORC[1].

GC programs can be faster than manually managed ones in some cases. It's just manual memory management gives you more control of where and when free is called. And a good type system is a privelege that gives Nim more control with destructors.

Another scarecrow of safe languages is GC pauses, which is also not a thing in Nim, see table in [2].

[0] - https://nim-lang.org/

[1] - https://nim-lang.org/blog/2020/10/15/introduction-to-arc-orc...

[2] - https://nim-lang.github.io/Nim/mm.html

    [ -z "$1" ] && { echo "missing argument, aborting." 1>&2; exit 1 }

Animals are either useful and breeded controllably, or useless and considered a pest, an obstacle to {insert any goal here}.

Also animals don't tend to think critically and at the high level to be considered dangerous. So I don't think it's fair to put humans and other animals in the same risk category.

And we did the worst things to fellow humans. I hope we didn't already forget about all the colonization, slavery and mass-eradication of native tribes in 18th century all over the world.

Coding has been solved in the sense that, per dollar spent, companies can get 10x or even 100x the amount of code of roughly the same terrible quality.

And the author is wrong. Nothing in the ban on heavy LLM-assisted projects + crypto and the subsequent blog post[0] is suggesting that Codeberg is against solo projects without community.

If you read the post[0] carefully and not using AI-summaries or assuming context from HN/Reddit/X comments you'll see that they are calling out specifically projects that overuse resources that are meant to be equally shared. For projects with large communities, that is expected, but solo projects with zero effective users spinning CI 20 hours a day and uploading many hundreds megabytes of code daily is just plain being an asshole.

When AI bros see words "free", they usually respond with "all for me?". But that's not how that works in most places, or atleast it's not sustainable.

Also note that Codeberg specifically said that while it's against terms, they are not going to scan for LLM-written code or pressure people to delete their small, low-resource-using repos.

[0] - https://blog.codeberg.org/protecting-our-floss-commons-from-...