Here's a talk from an llvm conference with the details.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AmjliNp0_00

  int sum(int n) {
      int sum = 0;
      for(int i = 0; i < n; i++) {
          sum +=i;
      }
      return sum;
  }

https://godbolt.org/z/so6neac33

So if you do a brute force solution which could have been reduced to a polyomial, clang has a shot of doing just that.

Amazon was a company that was around and survived the dot com bomb (founded in 1994, roughly around the time of the beginning of the bubble) [though its stock took about 7 years to recover]

Facebook was post dot com bomb. (founded 2004)

Thank you for the additional context.

But nothing in the article supports that view. What has changed are cattle ranching practices that reduce the opportunity of attack. Everything that the article talks about is "How did cattle ranchers adapt to an ever present threat of pumas and jaguars without killing them (for reasons that are not well discussed beyond a reference to a government mandate)" rather then "We're best buds now!" or even "We have found utility in the jaguar and puma population that benefits us".

It seems the adapted practices are beneficial on their own, but it sounds like they would be beneficial without jaguars and pumas.

They can only rely on 3p devs if they allow access to the hardware.

"Employee badges" can be implemented in a number of ways, from simple broadcasted rfids down to having secret challenge responses that aren't breakable without going down the jlsca route since the secret is on the device and never leaves it.

So, step 1: figure out what exactly the model your 'employee badge' is using and what protocol it uses. There's probably some marking on it that should give you the manufactuerer at least.

Example usage (found randomly by google, likely can find others):

https://www.veterinarywoman.co.uk/2015/02/the-stale-pale-mal...

Interestingly, google's search results indicate the phrase may be (currently) a UK thing (based on the domains of the results).

The organization has existed and has had a need to find funding for it's activities. Since the question was about 'state' run entities, the goal of "making a profit" seemed not particular salient.

Honestly, I thought the more contentious part of this claim was going to be if the Church of Sinai constituted a state.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saint_Catherine%27s_Monastery

In the US at least, I'd say for most of the existence of the web, the prevalent idea was that the best way to counter 'bad' speech was more speech.

The concern over 'misinformation' has resulted in a lot of people, whom previously had advocated for unrestricted speech, calling for regulation or removal of section 230.

https://www.nytimes.com/2021/04/02/opinion/misinformation-di...

Like many Zeitgeist trends, it is difficult to measure concretely and objectively, especially if it hasn't been tracked in the past. Especially when people's understanding of what constitutes "free" speech shifts over time.

If Acadia is engaged in insurance fraud, the insurance companies have every incentive to stop that.

You should write up a blog post where you had to debug some weird gnarly issues. A lot of us higher up the tech stack are pretty far removed from the signals level issues you're talking about but would love to hear about a low level debug session!