EDIT: I was mistaken, this only applies in California.

They rely on the government mandating that health insurance companies cover the shots. This drives up the price.

Take the new Toyota Prius, for example. The updated model almost looks like a concept car but still has a similar shape to other cars. There's no constraint reason Toyota couldn't have styled the car similarly in previous generations. I'm guessing they made the car look like this because Prius sales were falling and they decided they needed to be aggressive with styling for sales. They may have also decided that consumers that want a car with lots of cargo space are going for SUVs and crossovers anyways, so they could make the new Prius sleeker.

There are also tons of examples of automakers intentionally reserving nicer looking features as more expensive options or for more expensive luxury models. Fabric is not really cheaper than fake leather (both of these materials are just plastic). But automakers always charge more for fake leather.

Nano hydroxyapatite combined with fluoride has a little bit better evidence for it being better than fluoride alone.

For example, if I'm annoyed by having to use the touchscreen in a Tesla Model 3 to open the glove box, that counts as a problem even if it has nothing to do with the actual build quality. So in this case it makes sense that more tech = more things to get annoyed about, whether or not the tech is reliable.

For many months you couldn't even order a Model 3 Long Range, your only option was a Model Y Long Range.

That is, the attitudes of the staff are downstream of the students.

This is also reinforced by the fact that (entry-level) staff at universities are often recent humanities graduates from that university.

In other words, top colleges would just be full of poor whites and asians (instead of middle-to-upper class whites and asians, without affirmative action).