Also what's all this about the body that never breaks. We have insurance schemes because there is uncertainty about the human body. What are annuities? Contract law allows for exemptions for acts of god like if a hurricane hits you.

Listen, this person's life sucks. And it's important that society not abandon them. But that doesn't mean they can talk nonsense. This kind of suffering theology where we believe someone whose life is hard has access to some deep truth has no basis in reality. In fact, I'd argue that their thought is far more likely to be disordered.

You'll see this if you're ever at sea. You have an infinite amount of fresh water around you. All you have to do is avoid the salt in it.

In any case, doesn't this sound like an insane contract for Klarna to have signed? It's freaking Apple. Mind blowing deal for a buy-now-pay-later company to sign. Imagine being in the chain for an Apple product. What a coup.

It’s funny how we converged on a similar system. My agent is also written in Rust.

EDIT: Oh, home assistant. I use Home Assistant https://www.home-assistant.io/

In my case, I was foolish enough to run it all on my hardware which is pretty damned fast but has a duty cycle of 5% and runs idle most of the time. It's definitely better done via API.

Tell me more about the Alexa-like system! I have mine at home on a custom OpenWakeWord model trained on the word 'Aurora'. And I, too, have it hooked up to Home Assistant. I have a bunch of Eufy E21 baby cameras mounted on the walls[1] so it has vision through the house. The vision model uses GPT-5.5 on the subscription because I haven't yet set up a Qwen or Gemma multimodal that can see.

With Frigate on my home server I can even watch for events like my daughter waking up! And at night the agent sends out the vacuum if we've cleared the floor of baby toys. I feel this close to the dream of sci-fi AI. Because I auto-forward a bunch of my email to it etc. it knows about what's going on with me.

My wife will sometimes ask the agent information about me etc. and it's way easier to get a fast response rather than waiting for me to see the message etc.[2]

0: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47538158

1: https://wiki.roshangeorge.dev/w/Blog/2025-12-01/Grounding_Yo...

2: https://imgur.com/a/tP12lfj

The TTFT and tok/s are much higher on the small model so that makes it competitive for a bunch of things. It feels like what old Sonnet used to by the end of last year which is honestly damned good.

Now of course it’s hard to say if the original employment shape is still valid.

From another article: https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/tv/articles/netflix-exec...

Honestly, the whole thing seems sort of innocuous. He had some particular medical treatment and then drank a Guinness upside down. Maybe there was something else to it but if you're a big corp then you probably should just give a safe answer.

But one thing that’s interesting with the administration’s approach to so many things is the removal of tools to get information. In the article (which works in brave which suppresses the pop up) they talk about this tool to collect information on how a crash occurred. I get wanting to change priorities. As a bicyclist I can understand if road space is optimized for other uses due to the predominant form of use.

But I think one of the reasons the US is so prosperous is that we have here a reliable and high-quality data collection machine. The less you know about yourselves the worse you can achieve your objectives.

Massive tragedy that data collection fell to ideology. Though the ideology is very funny. It sounds like an angry redditor!

“This is a common sense approach despite the Left's belief that everyone should ride a bike to their shoebox-sized apartment to eat crickets to achieve a phony climate agenda”

So I cannot disagree with him on the idea. It’s only a matter of degree and whether we’re already there or not. I have $50k in GPUs that incentivizes me to believe we are not.

1. Assume the Rust rewrite of Bun went badly

2. Then something must be grievously wrong with a released bun runtime based on that code

3. Claude Code uses the released bun runtime based on that code

4. From #2 and #3, something must be grievously wrong with Claude Code

5. If something were grievously wrong with Claude Code, users would reduce use of Claude Code and use alternative tools

6. From #4 and #5, users are reducing use of Claude Code and using alternative tools

7. Claude Code has wide use and use is growing across all software engineering verticals

8. #6 and #7 contradict

9. From the contradiction, the assumption in #1 is false

The parts that are not explicitly spelled out here are an exercise for the reader. It doesn't really matter if the guy who wrote Bun said this or my uncle said this.

It seems that others like that though.