<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: arkadiytehgraet</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=arkadiytehgraet</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2026 05:10:10 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=arkadiytehgraet" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by arkadiytehgraet in "Goodbye to Sora"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Apparently, all possible movies, cinematics and ads have been generated by "enthusiasts at home", so the tool is no longer needed.<p>On a more serious note, it could be a sign of a more powerful and general model being developed/released in the near future, that would include Sora capabilities. Or AI-doomers were right, and this sunset is one of the proofs for them.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2026 20:50:12 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47509051</link><dc:creator>arkadiytehgraet</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47509051</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47509051</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by arkadiytehgraet in "Thinking Fast, Slow, and Artificial: How AI Is Reshaping Human Reasoning"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I am pretty sure this comment, as many others of the same poster were LLM-generated with slight prompt tweak, which is against TOS. Check their history for proofs.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2026 15:47:07 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47478737</link><dc:creator>arkadiytehgraet</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47478737</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47478737</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by arkadiytehgraet in "Marketing for Founders"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Please do not post AI slop here.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2026 10:46:28 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47386108</link><dc:creator>arkadiytehgraet</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47386108</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47386108</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by arkadiytehgraet in "Grammarly is offering ‘expert’ AI reviews from famous dead and living writers"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I explained in detail why it is true, and what would the opposite imply for you as a human being.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2026 20:26:13 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47314968</link><dc:creator>arkadiytehgraet</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47314968</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47314968</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by arkadiytehgraet in "Grammarly is offering ‘expert’ AI reviews from famous dead and living writers"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Even if the visualization of the integration process via steps typed out in the chat interface is the same as what you would have done on paper, the way the steps were obtained is likely very different for you and LLM. You recognized the integral's type and applied corresponding technique to solve it. LLM found the most likely continuation of tokens after your input among all the data it has been fed, and those tokens happen to be the typography for the integral steps. It is very unlikely are you doing the same, i.e. calculating probabilities of all the words you know and then choosing the one with the highest probability of being correct.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2026 18:51:55 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47313618</link><dc:creator>arkadiytehgraet</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47313618</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47313618</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by arkadiytehgraet in "So, you’ve hit an age gate. What now?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It's probably a good idea to let church go in 2026 too.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2026 21:32:08 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46623838</link><dc:creator>arkadiytehgraet</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46623838</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46623838</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by arkadiytehgraet in "Claude Code SDK"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>You should use some of those agents yourself to fix some glaring issues at your landing page.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2025 15:15:17 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44042559</link><dc:creator>arkadiytehgraet</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44042559</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44042559</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by arkadiytehgraet in "Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I am pretty sure ArthurStacks account is either a troll or an LLM gone rogue troll. There are so many contradictions among his own comments that it is embarrassing to list them all. But given the reaction and number of replies he gets, the trolling is rather successful.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2025 11:05:03 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43914230</link><dc:creator>arkadiytehgraet</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43914230</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43914230</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by arkadiytehgraet in "Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>You are making plenty of profit for 30 years and have not retired yet? Sounds like you are far less successful than what you are trying to project.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2025 09:47:36 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43913775</link><dc:creator>arkadiytehgraet</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43913775</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43913775</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[Google launches AI tools for practicing languages through personalized lessons]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://techcrunch.com/2025/04/29/google-launches-ai-tools-for-practicing-languages-through-personalized-lessons/">https://techcrunch.com/2025/04/29/google-launches-ai-tools-for-practicing-languages-through-personalized-lessons/</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43839466">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43839466</a></p>
<p>Points: 4</p>
<p># Comments: 0</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2025 23:50:03 +0000</pubDate><link>https://techcrunch.com/2025/04/29/google-launches-ai-tools-for-practicing-languages-through-personalized-lessons/</link><dc:creator>arkadiytehgraet</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43839466</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43839466</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by arkadiytehgraet in "Deep Learning Is Not So Mysterious or Different"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>That's a very wrong statement. Pretty sure I could explain all the maths, all the physics, all the electronics, all the operating systems and all the user space of a single high level language operation, when I was a fresh graduate. Now, I have forgotten most of the physics and electronics, since the university was quite some time ago, but feel free to ask any decent student of an IT bachelor, they should be able to pretty much build the PC from scratch. Sure, modern processors and whatnot add a bunch of optimizations, but you seem to really overstate the complexity of the computer.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2025 21:52:37 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43441182</link><dc:creator>arkadiytehgraet</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43441182</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43441182</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by arkadiytehgraet in "OpenAI asks White House for relief from state AI rules"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I believe with regulatory capture the companies that pushed for the regulation in the first place at least comply with it (and hopefully  the regulation is not worthless). This behaviour by ClosedAI is even worse: push for the regulation, then push for the exemption.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2025 19:59:42 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43356725</link><dc:creator>arkadiytehgraet</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43356725</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43356725</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by arkadiytehgraet in "Buy European Made. Support European Values"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Tech is partially, some would say even mostly, responsible for the current political atmosphere and climate, so no, neither we are any better than this, nor should it be avoided.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2025 11:45:42 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43279085</link><dc:creator>arkadiytehgraet</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43279085</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43279085</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by arkadiytehgraet in "Executive wealth as a factor in return-to-office"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>So you don't own a house after working for 30 years and you of all people are speaking about efficiency? This is really something to think about for you, mate</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2025 19:38:14 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43234140</link><dc:creator>arkadiytehgraet</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43234140</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43234140</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by arkadiytehgraet in "Introducing Ads in Threads"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Great, at least with ads there will be some posts in the network.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 24 Jan 2025 18:22:58 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42815768</link><dc:creator>arkadiytehgraet</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42815768</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42815768</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by arkadiytehgraet in "Why do we still teach people to calculate?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>As someone with reasonably good mental math skills (120+ score consistently on <a href="https://arithmetic.zetamac.com/" rel="nofollow">https://arithmetic.zetamac.com/</a>, default settings), I cannot really say it helps me much in the real life, at least not on the surface. It sure is nice to be able to estimate some things accurately without having to resort to a calculator, but in no way would anything change in the way I think or conclusions I make if I had to use one, so there might be some truth to what Mr Wolfram is suggesting.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 24 Jun 2024 21:07:31 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40780787</link><dc:creator>arkadiytehgraet</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40780787</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40780787</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by arkadiytehgraet in "RollerCoaster Tycoon at 25: 'It's mind-blowing how it inspired me'"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Original RCT most definitely had underground building, both for paths and attractions. I think 1 or 2 parks in the 'campaign' was even centered about being mostly underground.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2024 00:04:56 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39811677</link><dc:creator>arkadiytehgraet</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39811677</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39811677</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by arkadiytehgraet in "Apple hit with over 1.8B euro EU antitrust fine in Spotify case"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Could someone please explain to me the following: does Apple have to pay the fine just once and then it can continue with the same practice of taking its 30% cut and preventing Spotify to direct users outside of the app for payment?<p>Or can EU sue Apple immediately again for the same thing? Or does Apple get some time to change their ways and if they don't, then they will get fined even more?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2024 12:34:18 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39589670</link><dc:creator>arkadiytehgraet</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39589670</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39589670</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[The Reasoning Engine]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://reasoningengine.ai/p/the-reasoning-engine">https://reasoningengine.ai/p/the-reasoning-engine</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38784616">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38784616</a></p>
<p>Points: 3</p>
<p># Comments: 0</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 27 Dec 2023 18:03:08 +0000</pubDate><link>https://reasoningengine.ai/p/the-reasoning-engine</link><dc:creator>arkadiytehgraet</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38784616</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38784616</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by arkadiytehgraet in "FunSearch: Making new discoveries in mathematical sciences using LLMs"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I have been wondering recently about a good test for checking whether LLMs can only parrot stochastically or do they manage to indeed learn some higher order concepts inside their weights.<p>What if we would take a bare LLM, train it only on the information (in Maths, physics, etc) that was available to, say, Newton and then try to prompt it to solve the problems that Newton solved? Will it be able to derive the calculus basics and stuff having never seen it before, maybe even with little bit of help from the prompts? Maybe it will be able to come up with something completely different, yet also useful? Or nothing at all...</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2023 15:03:11 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38654838</link><dc:creator>arkadiytehgraet</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38654838</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38654838</guid></item></channel></rss>