This is a violation of the guidelines: "Throwaway accounts are ok for sensitive information, but please don't create accounts routinely. HN is a community—users should have an identity that others can relate to."

They attacked a HH-60M Medevac helicopter which is a war crime, and also explains why it wasn't protected.

Also, the radar was Iraqi, although possibly jointly operated with the US.

This can expose users to legal risks, but but can also add plausible deniability at the same time "it wasn't me, it was someone on VPN".

A proton is the lightest stable baryon, and thus the only only stable one. It's not a coincidence - in particle physics if a lighter elementary particle is possible the heavier one will ALWAYS decay into it. "Whatever is not forbidden is mandatory." (Combination particles like atoms are more complicated because there are other things that might force the particle to exist.)

All the particles made from just 3 light quarks have been found. And I think all of the ones made with 1 heavy quark and 2 light ones have also been found.

This is only the 2nd particle made from 2 heavy quarks that has ever been found.

It's not a coincidence that both of those were made with charm quarks, because charm quarks are the lightest of the heavy ones.

None made of 3 heavy quarks has been found (yet).

Also: A particle made with a top quark is not possible - it decays too quickly.

Also: I appreciate you found a source, unfortunately it's not true what they said. It's not possible to "leech nutrients through the hair to the scalp", the wrench story is not true either - there is zero chance a lab with the standards they have would just leave a wrench at the bottom of the pool - it would contaminate the water. Not to mention the bottom is filled with more of those light tubes, so there is no place for a wrench to sit. (And if someone dropped one it would break a tube.)

I don't know why someone would tell businessinsider such stories, but they are not true.

And see: https://chemistry.stackexchange.com/questions/7467/is-pure-w...

It's hard when a supposedly reliable news place writes things that are not true, but that's the world we live in. I guess technically they are just quoting stories they were told.

(My personal pet peeve is a news source that made everyone think you can't leave eggs outside the fridge if they were washed, (as they are in the US). This is not true, but "there's a news source".)

It's the reverse problem: because the water is so pure it easily gets contaminated by minor things. So all the equipment has to be carefully cleaned.

And (almost) everyone said how terrible it is - and yet they all use it.

Give it a bit of time for people to understand the limitations, and where it shines and it will become an indispensable part of life.

One thing I might agree with is land tax for non-profits that charge fees for services, as opposed to those who work off of donations. I think that would fix the issue without destroying non-profits.

And parking is a productive use - they have services once a week, and parking means people can come to the service. That's the definition of productive use. Something does not need to be used 24/7 to be productive.

That just means the business will raise prices.

I've tested this many times. Your feed has what you watch. If it's disastrous, that's because that what you actually like to watch.

Stop watching a topic and it will go away. About 2 months later YouTube will offer it again to see if you want it, if you don't it goes away again.

Gmail basically is IMAP with a couple extras, and your desktop (via a browser) and your phone (via a dedicated app) can both see the same messages. Only the phone can work offline though, because there is little demand for a dedicated desktop email client, it's always via a browser. But Google could easily make such a thing if they wanted.

I use AI for the easy stuff.