<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: artemisart</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=artemisart</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2026 13:21:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=artemisart" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by artemisart in "Opus 5 is currently #1 on Artificial Analysis Intelligence Leaderboard"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Yes same website <a href="https://artificialanalysis.ai/models#intelligence-comparison-tabs" rel="nofollow">https://artificialanalysis.ai/models#intelligence-comparison...</a> but they don't have graphs for the individual benchmarks sadly.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 14:33:07 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49047890</link><dc:creator>artemisart</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49047890</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49047890</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by artemisart in "Claude Opus 5"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>No it's a mean of 5 runs.<p>> We report FrontierCode’s overall score, a composite measure that grades each patch on blocking functional criteria (held-out unit tests) together with weighted code-quality rubric criteria, as mean@5.<p>They don't explain more in the system card, I guess higher effort levels could loose points on the code quality / scope / style / maintainability stuff?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 19:39:58 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49040678</link><dc:creator>artemisart</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49040678</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49040678</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by artemisart in "Kimi K3: Open Frontier Intelligence"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Official API doc says only max effort level is currently supported. <a href="https://platform.kimi.ai/docs/guide/kimi-k3-quickstart#thinking-effort" rel="nofollow">https://platform.kimi.ai/docs/guide/kimi-k3-quickstart#think...</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 00:12:13 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48941942</link><dc:creator>artemisart</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48941942</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48941942</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by artemisart in "Claude Fable is relentlessly proactive"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>bwrap is builtin in claude too, activate with /sandbox command.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2026 17:48:20 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48507235</link><dc:creator>artemisart</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48507235</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48507235</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by artemisart in "MAI-Code-1-Flash"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Hill climbing doesn't mean much but absolutely doesn't imply they cheat on benchmarks.
They have more details here <a href="https://microsoft.ai/news/introducing-mai-thinking-1/" rel="nofollow">https://microsoft.ai/news/introducing-mai-thinking-1/</a> it seems to be "RL on everything".</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2026 20:47:07 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48376049</link><dc:creator>artemisart</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48376049</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48376049</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by artemisart in "NSA is using Anthropic's Mythos despite blacklist"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Every US intelligence org probably has at least API access, but anything outside of the US? No chance.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 18:36:17 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47838654</link><dc:creator>artemisart</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47838654</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47838654</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by artemisart in "OpenZL: An open source format-aware compression framework"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I may be misunderstanding the question but that should be just decompressing gzip & compressing with something better like zstd (and saving the gzip options to compress it back), however it won't avoid compressing and decompressing gzip.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2025 21:16:36 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45496425</link><dc:creator>artemisart</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45496425</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45496425</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by artemisart in "GPT-5-Codex"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Does refactoring mean moving things around for people? Why don't you use your IDE for this, it already handles fixing imports (or use find-replace) and it's faster and deterministic.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2025 23:24:15 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45256171</link><dc:creator>artemisart</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45256171</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45256171</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by artemisart in "DuckDB NPM packages 1.3.3 and 1.29.2 compromised with malware"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Do you know about other security issues? If it's only about curl | sh it really isn't a problem, if the same website showed you a hash to check the file then the hash would be compromised at the same time as the file, and with a package manager you still end up executing code from the author that is free to download and execute anything else. Most package managers don't add security.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2025 01:32:25 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45191979</link><dc:creator>artemisart</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45191979</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45191979</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by artemisart in "DuckDB NPM packages 1.3.3 and 1.29.2 compromised with malware"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Why should we expect companies to be able to reuse the correct token if they can't coordinate on using a single domain in the first place?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2025 01:15:11 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45191848</link><dc:creator>artemisart</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45191848</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45191848</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by artemisart in "Mistral raises 1.7B€, partners with ASML"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Yes for parakeet, but only comparing benchmark results for canary. Whisper also has severe hallucinations on silence and noise and WhisperX helps a lot, it adds voice activity detection i.e. a model to detect when someone speaks, to filter the input before running whisper. <a href="https://github.com/m-bain/whisperX" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/m-bain/whisperX</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2025 23:34:50 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45191010</link><dc:creator>artemisart</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45191010</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45191010</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by artemisart in "Mistral raises 1.7B€, partners with ASML"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Nvidia parakeet and canary are better and faster, here is a leaderboard: <a href="https://huggingface.co/spaces/hf-audio/open_asr_leaderboard" rel="nofollow">https://huggingface.co/spaces/hf-audio/open_asr_leaderboard</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2025 10:57:25 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45180310</link><dc:creator>artemisart</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45180310</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45180310</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by artemisart in "Liquid Glass? That's what your M4 CPU is for"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>No, you never compute individual pixels because you never need to, and it's always faster to it in bulk (vectorization, memory access...) and so over an area you take the same number of pixels as input (or a little bit more with padding) and the blur will only increase significantly the compute.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2025 11:18:46 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45125971</link><dc:creator>artemisart</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45125971</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45125971</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by artemisart in "What's New with Firefox 142"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>This seems to be exclusive to Safari, I can't get it to work in Chrome either (and didn't know about the feature before right now, the discoverability is terrible).</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2025 11:42:13 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45101756</link><dc:creator>artemisart</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45101756</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45101756</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by artemisart in "Nvidia DGX Spark"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I don't understand what's not optimized on 5090. If we're comparing with Apple chips or AMD Strix Halo yes you will have very different hardware + software support, no FP4 etc. but here everything is CUDA, Blackwell vs Blackwell, same FP4 structured sparsity, so I don't get how it would be honest to compare a quantized FP4 model on Spark with an unoptimized FP16 model on a 5090 ?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2025 11:51:22 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45051030</link><dc:creator>artemisart</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45051030</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45051030</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by artemisart in "Nvidia DGX Spark"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Ok then just to clarify: you can fit 4x larger models on the Spark vs 5090, not 17x.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2025 10:41:35 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45050556</link><dc:creator>artemisart</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45050556</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45050556</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by artemisart in "Nvidia DGX Spark"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>That's very true and what's segmenting the market, but I don't understand why you're saying the 5090 supports only 12B model when it can go up to 50-60B (= a bit less than 64B to leave room for inference) as it supports FP4 as well.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2025 10:10:20 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45050393</link><dc:creator>artemisart</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45050393</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45050393</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by artemisart in "YouTube made AI enhancements to videos without warning or permission"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The economics don't make sense, each video is stored ~ once (+ replication etc. but let's say O(1)) but viewed n times, so server-side upscaling on the fly is way too costly and currently not good enough client-side.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2025 10:51:38 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45012471</link><dc:creator>artemisart</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45012471</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45012471</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by artemisart in "YouTube made AI enhancements to videos without warning or permission"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> Then, once that is perfected, they will offer famous content creators the chance to sell their "image" to other creators, so less popular underpaid creators can record videos and change their appearance to those of famous ones, making each content creator a brand to be sold.<p>I'm frightened by how realistic this sounds.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2025 10:47:40 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45012455</link><dc:creator>artemisart</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45012455</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45012455</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by artemisart in "Optician Sans – A free font based on historical eye charts and optotypes"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Yes I don't understand how they can claim it's optimized for legibility when the base font does the inverse.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2025 22:01:00 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44740014</link><dc:creator>artemisart</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44740014</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44740014</guid></item></channel></rss>