<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: asadotzler</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=asadotzler</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2026 12:57:43 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=asadotzler" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by asadotzler in "I won't download your app. The web version is a-ok"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>You cannot. An app can update just like a browser tab. In fact, a very many apps are just frickin' webviews.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2026 21:25:44 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47667358</link><dc:creator>asadotzler</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47667358</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47667358</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by asadotzler in "I won't download your app. The web version is a-ok"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Hard to believe when most apps are just a webview.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2026 21:23:59 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47667338</link><dc:creator>asadotzler</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47667338</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47667338</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by asadotzler in "Firm boosts H.264 streaming license fees from $100k up to staggering $4.5M"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Seeking is not getting, not even close. Suggesting it is only supports their propaganda and adds momentum to their bogus race to a cash grab.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2026 21:05:41 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47632280</link><dc:creator>asadotzler</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47632280</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47632280</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by asadotzler in "F-15E jet shot down over Iran"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>So, more whataboutism? Is this your m.o. here?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2026 20:55:17 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47632138</link><dc:creator>asadotzler</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47632138</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47632138</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by asadotzler in "F-15E jet shot down over Iran"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The success of the war depends on the approval ratings of the US president which will almost certainly take hits when US military takes hits so the US  citizens seeing the US military taking hits at a higher rate than relatively recent wars in the area is a bad sign for "winning" whatever "winning" means here.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2026 20:50:57 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47632094</link><dc:creator>asadotzler</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47632094</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47632094</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by asadotzler in "F-15E jet shot down over Iran"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>75 million using the YouGov number and just under 100 million using the Nate Silver average. (I think you must have used the more Trump-favorable number AND included children in your computation, which is not reasonable.)<p>Also worth noting that Nate Silver's measure has been declining for almost 3 weeks, the majority of the duration of the invasion.<p>Before the invasion, a University of Mariland poll says 55 million and a YouTov poll says 71 million support. These are useful numbers because we know there's a rally around the flag effect that distorts thinking during a conflict.<p><a href="https://criticalissues.umd.edu/feature/do-americans-favor-attacking-iran-under-current-circumstances-latest-critical-issues-poll-0" rel="nofollow">https://criticalissues.umd.edu/feature/do-americans-favor-at...</a>
<a href="https://yougov.com/en-us/articles/54158-few-americans-support-usa-military-action-against-iran-majority-think-it-is-likely-february-20-23-2026-economist-yougov-poll" rel="nofollow">https://yougov.com/en-us/articles/54158-few-americans-suppor...</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2026 20:41:12 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47631972</link><dc:creator>asadotzler</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47631972</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47631972</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by asadotzler in "Meta will shut down VR Horizon Worlds access June 15"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>No one wants to wear a PC on their faces. The  few who did wanted that for games but Zuck wanted a <i>social</i> VR platform, not a third-rate gaming console. Games couldn't even bring in the numbers needed to pivot anyone to social so they're giving up.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2026 16:51:01 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47428109</link><dc:creator>asadotzler</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47428109</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47428109</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by asadotzler in "The return-to-the-office trend backfires"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Not really. Workers produce the thing the company sells. Those workers are mostly trapped so they deal with whatever nonsense management is up to. Management, mostly useless, maintains its control and viability by asserting that workers need policing and they're the ones to do it. If the policing is relatively easy with WFH, they'll do that. If it's much harder, or less demonstrative of their fake value, screw that, they'll just pass that burden on to workers with RTO mandates.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2026 21:50:28 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47405423</link><dc:creator>asadotzler</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47405423</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47405423</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by asadotzler in "AirPods Max 2"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It took Apple realizing that putting fashion so far out ahead of function on Vision Pro was costing it usage to see the dual strap. The ergonomics of the first strap were dog shit, and everyone, certainly Apple, knew years before Vision Pro launched that a dual strap was the only way to make longer sessions viable. But a dual strap was also uglier, and Vision Pro already had acceptability problems.<p>Look at the marketing materials for Vision Pro using the single strap. Next, look at the marketing materials with the dual strap. Which one of those would sell better into an office context where at least half the population spends considerable time fixing their hair. Which one looks slightly futuristic and which looks like a CPAP headset.<p>"How it looks" led Apple to ship a deficient strap, one that made the device actually hurt to use. And how it looks is why Apple stuck with that garbage strap for 18 months despite knowing from extensive user research that the dual strap was superior ergonomically, and despite having already done the R&D for the dual strap.<p>It was only when Apple had mostly given up on Vision Pro, understanding that the user base wasn't going to hockey stick, that fashion was already a complete failure, that they began offering the sillier looking but infinitely more functional dual strap. After 18 months, all Apple had was its existing user base, selling only a few thousand devices a month, so it shifted from growth to sustaining and that's what the dual strap and M5 logic board swap was for, holding onto the few users it has until it could figure out how or if to proceed with the product line.<p>That's not the case with Apple's headphones. That strap could easily be a lot higher quality without being a lot less fashionable.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2026 21:29:02 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47405162</link><dc:creator>asadotzler</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47405162</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47405162</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by asadotzler in "Don't post generated/AI-edited comments. HN is for conversation between humans."]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>ML based word or phrase editing is hardly a problem any more than pre-AI spellcheckers were. AI sentence and paragraph manufacturing is a problem and everyone knows the difference between that slop and a spellchecker. No one cares if your editor does inline spellchecking or even word autocomplete. What they care about is slop and word at a time spelling or phrase grammar checking are harmless.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2026 02:01:22 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47345380</link><dc:creator>asadotzler</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47345380</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47345380</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by asadotzler in "After outages, Amazon to make senior engineers sign off on AI-assisted changes"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>LOL</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2026 21:17:36 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47328880</link><dc:creator>asadotzler</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47328880</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47328880</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by asadotzler in "Bluesky CEO Jay Graber is stepping down"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Wrong. B Corp boards are legally protected from lawsuits if they reject the highest bid when they put the company up for sale. In a C Corp, once the board puts the company on the auction block, not taking the highest bid, even from a company that's diametrically opposed to the goals of the C Corp, opens the board up to lawsuits from shareholders pissed about not getting the maximal return. Suggesting this is no difference shows a lack of understanding of the legal regime these types of corporations operate under.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2026 02:44:38 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47318535</link><dc:creator>asadotzler</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47318535</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47318535</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by asadotzler in "Bluesky CEO Jay Graber is stepping down"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Yes true.<p>B Corps allow the board to weigh things besides shareholder value. That's a meaningful distinction.<p>The idea is that shareholder primacy isn't compatible with everything every corporation wants to do, so having a board that's protected from lawsuits when they put things above shareholders is a useful thing and B Corps offer that.<p>The board can, for example, reject a "superior" takeover bid without fear of lawsuits from shareholders pissed off they didn't get the biggest payday available. A typical C Corp's board MUST take the highest offer, and not doing so WILL get them sued. That means if GoodGuy B Corp is about to be taken over by BadGuy Inc., the GoodGuy board can say "No, they're not compatible with the public benefit mission we incorporated under so we're not going to accept their offer." That's actually really useful.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2026 02:41:05 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47318510</link><dc:creator>asadotzler</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47318510</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47318510</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by asadotzler in "Google Safe Browsing missed 84% of confirmed phishing sites"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>99% of users don't even know they're being protected. There's no promise except "we work to make browsing safer" and cutting even 5% of malicious sites from a user's experience is an unmitigated win for that user at the low false positive rate Safe Browsing offers.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2026 20:12:02 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47266666</link><dc:creator>asadotzler</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47266666</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47266666</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by asadotzler in "Making Firefox's right-click not suck with about:config"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>This is the way. Turning off features <i>only</i> to unclutter a menu is silly and I can't believe there's not more pushback than your post here. userChrome.css exists for this exact reason, mucking about in UI without mucking about in feature machinery. I guess a text file and some CSS is just too hard many HN users.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2026 00:01:56 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47255736</link><dc:creator>asadotzler</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47255736</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47255736</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by asadotzler in "MacBook Neo"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>You can buy a brand new M1 Air at Walmart for $650.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2026 23:54:42 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47255684</link><dc:creator>asadotzler</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47255684</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47255684</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by asadotzler in "MacBook Neo"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Walmart sells a brand new M1 Air for ~$650 and refurbished for ~$500</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2026 23:51:58 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47255664</link><dc:creator>asadotzler</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47255664</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47255664</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by asadotzler in "MacBook Neo"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>From someone in this thread with actual experience:<p>>Chromebooks in EDU cost approximately $290 (+- $10) per unit.
>For the cost of 10 Neos, I can buy 17 Chromebooks.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2026 23:49:56 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47255650</link><dc:creator>asadotzler</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47255650</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47255650</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by asadotzler in "MacBook Neo"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>They famously don't. Betting and guessing doesn't work well here. Best to ask the question instead of make the assertion.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2026 23:38:05 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47255543</link><dc:creator>asadotzler</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47255543</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47255543</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by asadotzler in "MacBook Neo"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Samsung's flagship Galaxy series get software support for 7 years. A, M, F mid-range and low end models get 6 years of software support. The worst case today for the most popular mid to low spec phones is twice the "a few years" you claim, which suggests you're out of touch with the changes in the industry over the last few years.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2026 23:22:37 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47255421</link><dc:creator>asadotzler</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47255421</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47255421</guid></item></channel></rss>