<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: aschwtzr</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=aschwtzr</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2026 18:08:56 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=aschwtzr" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by aschwtzr in "Ask HN: Hackathons feel fake now"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I think there's a natural process similar to gentrification in which as technology matures the hackathons promoting it transition into marketing-led events. I got into hackathons in the early 2010s when IoT was the hot new thing and saw the crowds change from hardcore technologists to mostly students and idea people. The fact is the same thing that what drew me in is what attracted them - opportunity and optimism. Sponsors expect ROI and once a technology is no longer experimental, the same tired projects tend to win because they are tried and true.<p>I've been to a couple of good hackathons lately but they are more focused on vibe coding and tend to only run for 8-12 hours. These let you try out an idea or framework with little commitment but lack the depth of multi-day events. I've been attending an XR hackathon for almost a decade which still embodies the ethos, but it is a labor of love carried out by volunteers. These longer, challenging and intentional events can teach you more about teamwork and product in one weekend than a year of churning through tickets.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2025 15:56:34 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43906580</link><dc:creator>aschwtzr</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43906580</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43906580</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by aschwtzr in "Borges and AI"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>That was poorly worded, what I meant is that some people in general seem to think of LLMs as proxies for reality or truth., and Musk himself says he wants to build "truthGPT" <a href="https://www.theverge.com/2023/4/17/23687440/elon-musk-truthgpt-ai-chatgpt" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://www.theverge.com/2023/4/17/23687440/elon-musk-truthg...</a><p>That's the part I think is futile, because reality and truth are vast and moving targets there's no way to build a functional map.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2023 16:15:16 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38722403</link><dc:creator>aschwtzr</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38722403</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38722403</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by aschwtzr in "Borges and AI"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I thought of <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/On_Exactitude_in_Science" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/On_Exactitude_in_Science</a> and its relation to language, which is discussed by Baudrillard's Simulacra and Simulation. Large Language Models are the efforts of mapmakers to encapsulate reality in a way that is ultimately futile.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2023 17:59:32 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38711554</link><dc:creator>aschwtzr</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38711554</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38711554</guid></item></channel></rss>