Actually I think it is possible to reconcile Kant's third critique with the statement "LLM is possible to make aesthetic judgement" (with certain generous application of principle of charity, naturally).

The only challenge would be finding a very good cable that stays solidly.

1. School is perfect. 2. With a diplomat from a perfect school, the society's employment process is perfect.

I don't think either the definition of perfect nor the way of achieving such perfection can ever be agreed upon.

There has been extensive criticism on meritocracy in recent years, such as The Tyranny of Merit by Michael J. Sandel.

This will break almost all sso when authentication service is at different domain.

> We expect that advertising funded search engines will be inherently biased towards the advertisers and away from the needs of the consumers.

I highly recommend you to blame these two guys for their lack of recognition of how great Google is, here is their name: Sergey Brin and Lawrence Page.

You do realize

> having mostly succeeded at giving the poorest people one Earth an equal product to the richest people on Earth

is equivalent in this scenario of saying:

> having mostly succeeded at exploiting the poorest people one Earth an equal amount to the richest people on Earth.

While the poorest people have less already, right?

Disclaimer: I am from Scandinavian.

Unless you also believe the neutral view is earth being half flat and half round.

https://i.redd.it/eeoo4y00lkne1.jpeg

Also, governments consists of a large amount of human each acting for their own benefit. Assuming they can easily collectively united as a single force to use violence to harm all citizen (on the topic of privacy, it really is the case) suddenly is wild.

On the contrary, for a limited government, it very likely will result in using the monopoly of violence to provide extreme capitalism style IP and private property protection which results in dominating power of large companies. On the other hand, every bit of history demonstrated you can never maintain monopoly of violence if you are really against people.

Monopoly on economic is strong because it can be guarded by violence, while violence cannot be easily guarded by itself within a country (unless AI overlord really comes).

Read more history.