<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: asdfasgasdgasdg</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=asdfasgasdgasdg</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 18:23:14 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=asdfasgasdgasdg" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by asdfasgasdgasdg in "AI is slowing down"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>All good questions. I am not a big believer in claiming I know whether we are in a financial bubble or not. I just put it all in VT and we will see what happens. I know that the AI allows me to write code I couldn’t write before much more quickly than before but I admit that this may not help with organizational friction.<p>Although if this theory is true — that AI helps with coding but coding is not the friction point in organizations with multiple humans, even that should allow faster iteration by allowing one human to do more coding therefore reducing the size of teams required to make some programs. You should see good acceleration in solo shops too.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 14:13:35 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48461436</link><dc:creator>asdfasgasdgasdg</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48461436</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48461436</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by asdfasgasdgasdg in "AI is slowing down"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I’m not completely closed to your idea but if code was never the bottleneck why did so many organizations always feel so chronically low on coders? And of course this requires the AI to be no help at all with what is actually the bottleneck.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 02:03:55 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48455292</link><dc:creator>asdfasgasdgasdg</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48455292</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48455292</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by asdfasgasdgasdg in "AI is slowing down"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>If it was published in March 2026, even if the data was collected up to the day the study was published, 7/8ths of it would fail my “within the last six months” test. But I am looking forward to the results of future studies on this topic!</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2026 20:08:41 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48451115</link><dc:creator>asdfasgasdgasdg</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48451115</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48451115</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by asdfasgasdgasdg in "A Farmer Donated Land to Turn into a Park. The City Is Building a Data Center"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The impact should need to be material and related to some legal right you have, it seems to me. In general you cannot sue to enforce a contract or agreement you are not a party to, even if the outcome of adhering to that contract affects you.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2026 20:04:57 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48451064</link><dc:creator>asdfasgasdgasdg</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48451064</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48451064</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by asdfasgasdgasdg in "A Farmer Donated Land to Turn into a Park. The City Is Building a Data Center"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Hopefully just being a resident of a city doesn’t give you standing to sue over any decision that has a tenuous adverse effect on you. I mean if that holds why shouldn’t visitors who might one day hope to visit the given park have standing to sue?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2026 16:47:49 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48447758</link><dc:creator>asdfasgasdgasdg</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48447758</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48447758</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by asdfasgasdgasdg in "AI is slowing down"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I can see an argument that the productivity gains are illusory / don’t translate to economic productivity. I’m not denying the possibility.<p>However, most of the engineers I respect have gone from being skeptics a year ago to convinced today. I don’t personally know any true holdouts any more. If there are studies that disprove productivity gains more than six months ago, I’m happy to believe that it was true of the AIs that were available at the time. But I’m going to need something much more recent before I disbelieve my lyin’ eyes where it pertains to the AIs available today.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2026 16:40:59 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48447645</link><dc:creator>asdfasgasdgasdg</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48447645</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48447645</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by asdfasgasdgasdg in "S&P 500 rejects SpaceX, also blocking entry for OpenAI and Anthropic"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Well it’s just the S&P. Other big indices may include it eg the Russell 3000. But it’s not quite as big of a deal as it seems because the market cap on which they scale is the float not the whole value of the company.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2026 13:52:53 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48425169</link><dc:creator>asdfasgasdgasdg</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48425169</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48425169</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by asdfasgasdgasdg in "AWS reportedly to tuck Grok into Bedrock, despite zero enterprise demand"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>To be fair I don’t act all surprised when someone who has never signaled approval of my boycott doesn’t comply with it.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2026 03:53:25 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48332384</link><dc:creator>asdfasgasdgasdg</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48332384</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48332384</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by asdfasgasdgasdg in "What is a Demand Coop"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Did the union do <i>exactly</i> what you wished it to do in all cases? I.e. your perspective carried every single vote? That is the claim I was disputing. For the vast majority of union workers, this will not be the case. Even if it was true for you, it's not true for most.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2026 14:08:44 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48222848</link><dc:creator>asdfasgasdgasdg</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48222848</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48222848</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by asdfasgasdgasdg in "What is a Demand Coop"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> the union can do exactly what you wish it to do.<p>There is no such thing. A problem with a union is that everyone's going the same place, and you're not driving. Maybe that place is better than where you could get to on your own, or maybe not. But one thing that is definitely not true is that your union is going to do exactly what you want.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2026 02:53:00 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48217260</link><dc:creator>asdfasgasdgasdg</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48217260</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48217260</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by asdfasgasdgasdg in "An OpenAI model has disproved a central conjecture in discrete geometry"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>When people say this what they mean is that we've had plausibly useful LLMs for around three years, and I would say that is basically true. The stuff before 2023 could barely be classified above the level of an interesting toy.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2026 23:50:21 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48215955</link><dc:creator>asdfasgasdgasdg</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48215955</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48215955</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by asdfasgasdgasdg in "An OpenAI model has disproved a central conjecture in discrete geometry"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>When people say this what they mean is that we've had plausibly useful LLMs for around three years, and I would say that is basically true.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2026 23:49:49 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48215950</link><dc:creator>asdfasgasdgasdg</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48215950</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48215950</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by asdfasgasdgasdg in "Gemini 3.5 Flash"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p><a href="https://gemini.google.com/share/9cd8ca68025a" rel="nofollow">https://gemini.google.com/share/9cd8ca68025a</a><p>I was trying to understand a game I've been playing, The Last Spell. I asked it for a tier list of omens -- which ones the community considers most important. At least a few of the names it posts are hallucinated ("omen of the sun" does not exist, and the omens that give extra gold are "savings," "fortune," and "great wealth").<p>Obviously not a critical use case but issues like this do keep me on my toes regarding whether the thing is working at all. I should ask 3.5 flash to do the same job. (I did try and it once again hallucinated the omen names and some of the effects.)</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2026 19:38:14 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48198343</link><dc:creator>asdfasgasdgasdg</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48198343</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48198343</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by asdfasgasdgasdg in "The American Rebellion Against AI Is Gaining Steam"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I don't think AI is going to be as easy to give up on as nuclear. Nuclear has some long term/diffuse benefits, but in the short run it's just one among many types of electricity generation. AI is a whole category, not one substitutable member of an already common category. Us giving up on AI development would be more like giving up on electricity generation than like giving up on nuclear.<p>Human cloning is a solution with no corresponding problem. We can make more humans very easily, if we have someone willing to bear those humans and take care of them.<p>If AI becomes demonstrably useful, opting out will be incredibly challenging, since we cannot force other countries to disarm.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2026 05:15:39 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48189442</link><dc:creator>asdfasgasdgasdg</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48189442</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48189442</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by asdfasgasdgasdg in "The American Rebellion Against AI Is Gaining Steam"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> 1. So AI companies royally screwed over artists and other culture workers.<p>Counterpoint: AI's displacement of culture workers is to this point negligible. Nobody is consuming AI-generated media, except maybe in the trashiest tier of tiktok scrolling. Culture workers feel screwed, but they have not in fact been screwed.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2026 05:08:24 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48189387</link><dc:creator>asdfasgasdgasdg</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48189387</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48189387</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by asdfasgasdgasdg in "Japan’s robot wolf sells out as record bear attacks drive demand"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Eh, I don't think there is much active encroachment happening any longer. Japan is no longer growing into its rural areas so much as receding from them.<p>Also, under certain constructions of the word "territory," (including the legal one) all territory in Japan is human territory. The bears are allowed to live on some of it but it is at the sufferance of the Japanese people.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2026 01:39:30 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48165361</link><dc:creator>asdfasgasdgasdg</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48165361</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48165361</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by asdfasgasdgasdg in "Rewrite Bun in Rust has been merged"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Ah fair point. I don't have a sense of which of those are more verbose.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 20:11:26 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48140603</link><dc:creator>asdfasgasdgasdg</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48140603</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48140603</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by asdfasgasdgasdg in "Rewrite Bun in Rust has been merged"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>If anything, it's a little surprising that the Rust code isn't significantly larger because I tend to think of Rust as requiring somewhat more boilerplate than JS.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 19:15:34 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48139907</link><dc:creator>asdfasgasdgasdg</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48139907</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48139907</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by asdfasgasdgasdg in "Using OR-Tools CP-SAT for Scheduling Problems"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It's important to get it done reasonably quickly because the disks at the time were ephemeral, so how quickly we could solve the problem effectively limited our rolling restart rate.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 17:19:48 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48124770</link><dc:creator>asdfasgasdgasdg</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48124770</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48124770</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by asdfasgasdgasdg in "Using OR-Tools CP-SAT for Scheduling Problems"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>In a past life we used OR-Tools for a problem of assigning data shards to serving tasks, where the data shards had heterogenous demands (e.g. some shards were low traffic but demanded sub millisecond latency targets and thus were served from RAM, others were higher traffic but could tolerate being served from flash, etc.). It's insane how expressive this thing is! But the problem got to be so large that we ended up having to hand-roll something less optimal because it would take multiple minutes to generate assignments -- think: millions of shards, tens of thousands of serving tasks, and I want to say it was ultimately nine dimensions of constraints.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 12:33:34 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48121093</link><dc:creator>asdfasgasdgasdg</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48121093</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48121093</guid></item></channel></rss>