I'm currently using a Pixel 9 Pro with GrapheneOS and not in the market for the Signature 27 because of size and low RAM. But I'm definitely considering upcoming Motorola devices with GrapheneOS support.

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49890490

Points: 2

# Comments: 0

Agreed.

> So the question is on average are these statistical regularities better or worse than those introduced by the alternative,

Indeed. This is an empirical question. That is what the article is about, for a specific setting.

> ... and the answer is no, if implemented properly.

I don't agree with that. This is not about implementation. It's about how the statistical regularities that are imposed on the full output distribution affect that distribution. There is a change - by construction. That change can be good in some situations and bad in others. The authors claim that it is mostly bad in the setting that they investigated. This looks like a fair statement.

Changing the distribution is the whole point: it introduces statistical regularities that can be detected.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tau_Zero

The first reply on the X thread is by Gerardo Delgado, who is "Sr. Director of Product - Local AI, Creators, Developers @NVIDIA" according to his profile. In his post, he says "My team's goal at NVIDIA is to grow Local AI."

In any case, my parent comment was meant for stock Pixels, as mentioned by armadyl further up in this thread.

based on is the important part here. Yes, AOSP would survive without Google. But as long as Google is in control of AOSP, it controls the direction in which AOSP and all downstream projects are headed. Because of breaking changes in AOSP, there is a cost in maintaining downstream changes. So downstream projects cannot veer off too far, short of a hard fork.

> You're misinformed about security preview patches. It has nothing to do with Google being hostile.

Does it not? From the 2025092500 GrapheneOS release notes: "We strongly disagree with broadly distributing patches to OEMs 3-4 months before the official publication date. It further delays getting patches to users and sophisticated attackers will have no issue getting the patches from one of many people at Android OEMs with early access."

Sounds pretty hostile to me.

One could even say, the mark is load-bearing.

Even if you don't have access to an attic, there are antenna constructions that can work for apartments. Have a look at "ARRL's Small Antennas for Small Spaces" and RSGB's "Stealth Antennas" as starting points.

Alternatively, you could consider a portable solution where you carry a small HF rig and some wire in a backpack. The Yaesu FT-857D is very popular for this as it's small, all bands, all modes and does 100W. If you search for "Yaesu FT-857D backpack" you will find many suggestions. It's not in production anymore but you might find it second hand. For Yaesu, other options include the FT-891 (no VHF/UHF) and the more bulky FT-991A. Icom has the IC-7100, which is also a little more bulky than the FT-857D.