<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: asr</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=asr</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2026 22:10:07 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=asr" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by asr in "I'm reluctant to verify my identity or age for any online services"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I use lights every day, but I know way less about electricity than my grandparents, two of whom who could remember when their town was electrified as children and who therefore treated it as the marvel it truly is. And also because we've worked out a ton of bugs in electricity and it often just works.<p>My kids will know way less about filesystems than I do, because I had to learn DOS commands to navigate around the operating system if I wanted to play computer games, which led to a lifelong interest in how computers actually work at a level they can (and, so far, do) happily ignore.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2026 16:08:09 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47234514</link><dc:creator>asr</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47234514</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47234514</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by asr in "On loyalty to Your Employer"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Exactly the right attitude. If you're dealing with an employer that thinks everything should be transactional and that it's no issue if they nickle and dime you on small things, it gets tiring (ask me how I know). When your employer acts in ways that value their employees, it's ok to put a value on that, even if you recognize they're not your spouse and they may lay you off or act in other un-loyal ways in the future.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2025 18:52:25 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43786133</link><dc:creator>asr</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43786133</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43786133</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by asr in "FTC takes action against GoDaddy for alleged lax data security"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>GoDaddy will have known of this investigation since it began—probably for years. So it’s 90 days from now(ish), but they (should) have gotten a head start.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2025 03:23:46 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42861153</link><dc:creator>asr</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42861153</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42861153</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[Ask HN: who are the great new writers about programming and startups?]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I just sent two co-workers a link to 2006 article from Joel on Software (this one: https://www.joelonsoftware.com/2006/06/16/my-first-billg-review/ ) to explain a management style we were observing. Then I thought, I don't know who to follow for great writing about programming and startups anymore! PG, and patio11, and Joel are all great, but they are all... old (with apologies to Patrick, who I think is by far the youngest on this list).<p>If you appreciate great writing, and you like reading about the business of software and programming, who are you reading these days?<p>(Note I said READING so, while I love podcasts and Youtube, I'm looking especially for written work work.)</p>
<hr>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42809044">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42809044</a></p>
<p>Points: 6</p>
<p># Comments: 2</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 23:15:59 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42809044</link><dc:creator>asr</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42809044</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42809044</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by asr in "The other British invasion: how UK lingo conquered the US"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Hah! But if you say “on holiday,” I would have expected you to know “lift.”<p>(or is there a region in the US where this is common? Everyone I know would say “on vacation,” but the US is very regional.)</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 2024 23:53:36 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41746586</link><dc:creator>asr</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41746586</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41746586</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by asr in "Why the CrowdStrike bug hit banks hard"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Not MSFT’s fault: <a href="https://stratechery.com/2024/crashes-and-competition/" rel="nofollow">https://stratechery.com/2024/crashes-and-competition/</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2024 15:38:05 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41120142</link><dc:creator>asr</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41120142</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41120142</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by asr in "Google Chrome has an API accesible only from *.google.com"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> in the olden days Microsoft wasn't allowed to add APIs to Windows that could only be used by IE<p>This is not true.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 12 Jul 2024 01:46:39 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40942151</link><dc:creator>asr</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40942151</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40942151</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by asr in "Google Chrome has an API accesible only from *.google.com"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Worth caring about why?? Because you think Google shouldn’t be allowed to make things better for their users? Like I said, you are so concerned about fairness you’re missing the point.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2024 02:52:45 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40923301</link><dc:creator>asr</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40923301</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40923301</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by asr in "Google Chrome has an API accesible only from *.google.com"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>So the concern is that Google is making Hangouts better in a way that is hard for competitors to replicate? (And by "hard," I mean, "competitors have to ask users to install something," not hard in any HN-relevant sense of the word.) This forum sure has a lot of wanna-be Handicapper Generals. <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harrison_Bergeron" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harrison_Bergeron</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2024 20:01:29 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40920441</link><dc:creator>asr</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40920441</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40920441</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by asr in "Sam Altman Was Fired from YC"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Four years ago, Altman’s mentor, Y Combinator founder Paul Graham, flew from the United Kingdom to San Francisco to give his protégé the boot, according to three people familiar with the incident, which has not been previously reported.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2023 21:10:24 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38385156</link><dc:creator>asr</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38385156</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38385156</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[Sam Altman Was Fired from YC]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2023/11/22/sam-altman-fired-y-combinator-paul-graham/">https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2023/11/22/sam-altman-fired-y-combinator-paul-graham/</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38385155">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38385155</a></p>
<p>Points: 3</p>
<p># Comments: 1</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2023 21:10:23 +0000</pubDate><link>https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2023/11/22/sam-altman-fired-y-combinator-paul-graham/</link><dc:creator>asr</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38385155</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38385155</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by asr in "Alexa and Google Home expose users to vishing and eavesdropping"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>This makes no sense.  Phishing comes from phreak + fishing, but the "ph" in phreak is already from the word phone (phone + freak) -- so the ph in "phishing" already comes from the word phone!  The telephone version of phishing should be... "phishing."<p>But thanks for the explanation.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 21 Oct 2019 00:16:31 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21308276</link><dc:creator>asr</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21308276</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21308276</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by asr in "Apple Dominates App Store Search Results, Thwarting Competitors"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Your question is worded to suggest you are not actually open to the answer, but I will try anyway: in antitrust law.  You cannot create an open App Store ecosystem, invite in outside developers, and then pivot and kill them all off by steering customers to your own app.  Closing off your previously-open ecosystem can be illegal.  Read Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Servs.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 10 Sep 2019 14:32:00 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20928632</link><dc:creator>asr</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20928632</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20928632</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by asr in "New Google and Facebook Inquiries"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Actually the US and the EU both target anticompetitive behavior.  The US law is older and so is call antitrust for historical reasons, not because of a legal difference.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2019 21:38:34 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20900153</link><dc:creator>asr</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20900153</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20900153</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by asr in "Elizabeth Warren Came Up with a Plan to Break Up Big Tech"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>This is basically how Texas sells electricity.[1] I'm not an expert on it but it makes a ton of sense.<p>Of course, it may be easier to do this for electricity, where the fundamental technology doesn't change quickly anymore (as far as I know), than for internet connectivity, where we are still undergoing fairly rapid technological change, relatively speaking.<p>[1] <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deregulation_of_the_Texas_electricity_market" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deregulation_of_the_Texas_elec...</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 20 Aug 2019 23:04:01 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20753143</link><dc:creator>asr</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20753143</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20753143</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by asr in "Elizabeth Warren Came Up with a Plan to Break Up Big Tech"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Not only is this not "entirely" true--it's not at all true. The author is disguising a (hotly contested) opinion/minority position as a well-accepted fact.<p>The mainstream position in the antitrust world, even among liberals (at least until recently), is that Bork's theory is generally right.  (For example, Barack Obama's antitrust appointees would generally have agreed with it.)<p>What Bork did was bring economic models (i.e. math) to bear in antitrust analysis.  Before Bork, antitrust law was basically run on judges' intuition about whether business practices were good or bad.  After Bork, there is more structure to the analysis--if we are trying to figure out whether things are good or bad for consumer prices, there's an economic framework we can use so that we're not just making random guesses.<p>You can quibble with the math, but it seems crazy to go back to a world where we just say "big mergers are bad."  <i>Some</i> mergers are bad, sure.  But some are not.  For example, I have yet to hear anyone explain why Amazon's purchase of Whole Foods is bad for anyone other than other grocery stores (who have to try to compete as Amazon figures out grocery delivery).</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 20 Aug 2019 22:53:11 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20753049</link><dc:creator>asr</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20753049</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20753049</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[How Gamergate Created a Playbook for a Culture War]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/08/15/opinion/what-is-gamergate.html">https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/08/15/opinion/what-is-gamergate.html</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20710131">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20710131</a></p>
<p>Points: 4</p>
<p># Comments: 0</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 15 Aug 2019 22:00:12 +0000</pubDate><link>https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/08/15/opinion/what-is-gamergate.html</link><dc:creator>asr</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20710131</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20710131</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by asr in "Google and Mozilla are failing to support browser extension developers"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>On the one hand, this seems like a real missed opportunity by Mozilla.  As Chrome reigns in extensions that conflict with Google's business model, this is a reason to use Firefox.<p>BUT - extensions are also often the cause of a slow and frustrating Firefox experience, which then leads folks to talk about how Chrome is better-performing/faster (I've been guilty of this myself in the past).  Mozilla needs to make sure Firefox is keeping pace with Chrome, which they've presumably decided means de-emphasizing extensions.<p>That said, not sure why Mozilla needs to de-emphasize donation buttons.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 01 Aug 2019 20:56:48 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20588279</link><dc:creator>asr</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20588279</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20588279</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by asr in "Approaching Peak Housing Dysfunction in California"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Quorum rules are to make sure you're not holding a sneaky midnight vote with two councilors asleep.  Councilors who are present but recused should count toward a quorum.<p>You might still have a rule that at least two votes are required to pass something (to prevent a 1-0 vote with four recusals).  But requiring at least thee votes on a five-member council is requiring an outright majority, which means a recusal is the same as a no vote.  That seems unfair.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 26 Jul 2019 22:28:49 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20538914</link><dc:creator>asr</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20538914</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20538914</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by asr in "Approaching Peak Housing Dysfunction in California"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Yes, this seems like a critical part of the story. I take it the actual vote was 2-1 in favor of the permit, but you need at least 3 votes to pass something in San Bruno, no matter what?  If so, the city council's rules don't deal appropriately with recusal and those should be changed ASAP.<p>At the same time, whether or not this project succeeded or failed, the larger story about how hard it is to build housing remains fundamentally true (and broken).</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 25 Jul 2019 20:08:31 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20529056</link><dc:creator>asr</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20529056</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20529056</guid></item></channel></rss>