Or even let us maybe use haiku only with claws?

But if this becomes a hassle, I won’t mind giving my $200/month to OpenAI instead.

Cuz for whatever reason, they seem to have way higher quotas even in the $20 plan.

Time for nanoclaw to add an adapter to work with other SDKs.

Like branching a document for a particular negotiation. Or branch it when adapting it to a new jurisdiction’s laws, etc.

It would benefit so much from that workflow or mindset.

Why bother with a drawing tool when you can literally mockup with real components and react etc.

They’ll always be visually consistent if you set things up that way. And the agents can help you with it.

Her main argument was, is this just going to sit around gathering dust?

and I’m about to go on a gridfinity spree in the next few weeks so she’s going to enjoy the OCD organizing.

I have had at least 2-3 situations where Flighty gave me information before the airport did, and that I ended up being a guy informing a few fellow passengers on the status of our flight before the airlines did.

They've chosen a niche, have executed extremely well, and I'm happy to throw $50/year at them to say thank you for an excellent product that does everything I want.

My ONLY complaint is that during a flight, flighty's live activity or something uses up a TON of battery. It seems unlike them to overlook such a thing when the rest of the app has such a polish and attention to detail (form and function-wise)

(Just kidding, thank you for creating homebrew and your continued work on it!)

I just bought one a couple weeks ago actually.

If you try to understand this stuff outside the context of fashion, you'll go around in circles (as I did).

If you see this through the lens of "people will pay anything to signal various things to others" and "you can charge whatever the market will bear" then it all adds up.

https://bun.com/blog/behind-the-scenes-of-bun-install

Then look at how Anthropic basically Acquihired the entire Bun team. If the CS fundamentals didn't matter, why would they?

Even Anthropic needs people that understand CS fundamentals, even though pretty much their entire team now writes code using AI.

And since then, Jared Sumner has been relentlessly shaving performance bottlenecks from claude code. I have watched startup times come way down in the past couple months.

Sumner might be using CC all day too. But an understanding of those fundamentals (more a way of thinking rather than specific algorithms) still matter.

I'm sure there are many variables across our experiences. But I know I'm not imagining what I'm seeing, so I'm bullish on the idea of an AI-curated encyclopedia, whether Elon Musk is involved or not.

It's exactly what (In my opinion) a mouse utility should be. There when you need it, invisible 99.9% of the time.

I guess it would be to avoid tool use?

Really? Have you used AI to write documentation for software? Or used AI to generate deep research reports by scouring the internet?

Because, while both can have some issues (but so do humans), AI already does extremely well at both those tasks (multiple models do, look at the various labs' Deep Research products, or look at NotebookLM).

Grokipedia is roughly the same concept of "take these 10,000 topics, and for each topic make a deep research report, verify stuff, etc, and make minimal changes to the existing deep research report on it. preserve citations"

So it's not like it's automatically some anti-woke can't-be-trusted thing. In fact, if you trust the idea of an AI doing deep research reports, this is a generalizable and automated form of that.

We can judge an idea by its merits, politics aside. I think it's a fascinating idea in general (like the idea of writing software documentation or doing deep research reports), whether it needs tweaks to remove political bias aside.

My favorite is Flibbitygibbeting…

I guess that’s why they have a setting for it.

But then again, I always used to think “if you name it CockroachDB, there’s no way in hell I’m recommending this to a non-tech client unless I’ve known them for years and they fully trust my judgement” and even then, I wouldn’t blame them for not taking it seriously.

So one man’s amusement is another man’s annoyance?