<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: attilagyorffy</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=attilagyorffy</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 May 2026 17:42:45 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=attilagyorffy" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by attilagyorffy in "Last.fm is now independent"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>This is very exciting. The music landscape is just as chaotic as it was back in 2007 (when CBS acquired Last.fm) if not even more complex these days. Can't wait to see what's next. <3</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2026 16:03:10 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48296280</link><dc:creator>attilagyorffy</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48296280</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48296280</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by attilagyorffy in "Ask HN: Is Slack having some trouble?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>If we have high availability connectivity for servers, I feel like corporations should also consider applying the same principles for inter-personal communication. A distributed and encrypted protocol with a similar feature set to Slack would come handy. Any suggestions?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2023 09:38:20 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36891113</link><dc:creator>attilagyorffy</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36891113</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36891113</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by attilagyorffy in "OpenSSL SSL3_AL_WARNING undefined alert remote DoS"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>there's currently no post on openssl.org but i expect them to publish one soon. Also, now with all the OpenSSL sh*tstorm this year, I really wonder if LibreSSL is vulnerable to this security problem...</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2016 14:31:34 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12779096</link><dc:creator>attilagyorffy</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12779096</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12779096</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[OpenSSL SSL3_AL_WARNING undefined alert remote DoS]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2016/q4/224">http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2016/q4/224</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12779082">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12779082</a></p>
<p>Points: 79</p>
<p># Comments: 17</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2016 14:30:05 +0000</pubDate><link>http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2016/q4/224</link><dc:creator>attilagyorffy</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12779082</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12779082</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by attilagyorffy in "A TCP weakness in Linux systems allows network traffic hijack"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I vaguely remember something around a potential fix but I lost track of it. The strange thing is that this appeared yesterday. I haven't had time to actually test this, am just looking to see what the community knows, whether someone could confirm this.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2016 09:22:14 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12260442</link><dc:creator>attilagyorffy</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12260442</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12260442</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by attilagyorffy in "A TCP weakness in Linux systems allows network traffic hijack"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I've found this on isssource and am surprised that it has not spread like wildfire. If the claims are true then this is an issue that should be taken seriously. Posting here for discussion.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2016 08:56:49 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12260373</link><dc:creator>attilagyorffy</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12260373</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12260373</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[A TCP weakness in Linux systems allows network traffic hijack]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="http://www.isssource.com/fixing-an-internet-security-threat/">http://www.isssource.com/fixing-an-internet-security-threat/</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12260364">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12260364</a></p>
<p>Points: 129</p>
<p># Comments: 23</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2016 08:53:49 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.isssource.com/fixing-an-internet-security-threat/</link><dc:creator>attilagyorffy</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12260364</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12260364</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[An up-to-date TodoMVC with Ember and a Phoenix backend using JSONAPI]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://attilagyorffy.com/2016/07/24/todomvc-with-ember-and-phoenix-using-jsonapi/">https://attilagyorffy.com/2016/07/24/todomvc-with-ember-and-phoenix-using-jsonapi/</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12153288">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12153288</a></p>
<p>Points: 4</p>
<p># Comments: 0</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 24 Jul 2016 13:48:49 +0000</pubDate><link>https://attilagyorffy.com/2016/07/24/todomvc-with-ember-and-phoenix-using-jsonapi/</link><dc:creator>attilagyorffy</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12153288</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12153288</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by attilagyorffy in "The state of LibreSSL in FreeBSD"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>This really is a more complex question then it may seem. One of the reasons I haven't yet upgraded my production system is because I want to be able to keep my system up-to-date. Now, having to manually patch the FreeBSD source tree once a new upgrade lands is a bit of a pain. The point of the article is really about exploring where we are and where the FreeBSD community is headed.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 03 Jul 2016 18:07:59 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12026984</link><dc:creator>attilagyorffy</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12026984</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12026984</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by attilagyorffy in "The state of LibreSSL in FreeBSD"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I know this is just nitpicking but you may want to use capital V instead: `ssh -V`.<p>And indeed the SSH command originates from OpenBSD and uses LibreSSL 2.1.8.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 03 Jul 2016 14:29:47 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12026147</link><dc:creator>attilagyorffy</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12026147</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12026147</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[The state of LibreSSL in FreeBSD]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://attilagyorffy.com/2016/07/02/the-state-of-libressl-in-freebsd/">https://attilagyorffy.com/2016/07/02/the-state-of-libressl-in-freebsd/</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12025638">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12025638</a></p>
<p>Points: 104</p>
<p># Comments: 21</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 03 Jul 2016 11:13:06 +0000</pubDate><link>https://attilagyorffy.com/2016/07/02/the-state-of-libressl-in-freebsd/</link><dc:creator>attilagyorffy</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12025638</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12025638</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by attilagyorffy in "FreeBSD 10.3 officially supported on Microsoft Azure"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>ha, funnily just one day before code freeze of freebsd 11 :) nevertheless it's great that freebsd is getting more attention these days.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2016 09:47:21 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11868388</link><dc:creator>attilagyorffy</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11868388</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11868388</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by attilagyorffy in "The Rails Doctrine"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I've been a Rails developer for 10 years now and I have to say it is still my favourite tool of choice (yes even in 2016). There are other interesting tools and frameworks out there (I'd love to put my hands on Phoenix and Elixir if I had the time) but for now I have to be honest: When I start a new client project I have to consider a few things:<p>* Using a well-known framework is favourable over new shiny toys in a commercial system<p>* An ecosystem that has good 'defaults' is essential. A single web framework won't do everything for you. You need stuff around that for testing, deployments, etc.<p>For mainly the reasons above Rails is still my primary tool of choice. Yes, it has pinpoints but the reasons above far outweigh the new and shiny.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2016 18:27:06 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10932708</link><dc:creator>attilagyorffy</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10932708</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10932708</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by attilagyorffy in "Show HN: ied – an alternative package manager for Node"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>if you can make this work in a way that it's capable of reinstalling a precise snapshot (like using a Gemfile.lock in Ruby's Bundler world) and keep it stable then I once again will have faith in JS package management.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2015 00:25:00 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10571894</link><dc:creator>attilagyorffy</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10571894</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10571894</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by attilagyorffy in "Microsoft Is Said to Evaluate Possible Bid for Salesforce.com"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>my thoughts exactly. whilst i don't care about Salesforce's CRM, i wouldn't want MS to put their hands on heroku. Once MS bought one of my favourite companies (Rareware, now Rare as part of MS Game Studios), effectively they killed creativity. I'm not saying that MS is necessarily evil, all I'm saying is that I've seen this once and I have been really disappointed.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2015 20:09:25 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9494637</link><dc:creator>attilagyorffy</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9494637</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9494637</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by attilagyorffy in "Pirate Bay to Open Its Own .PIRATE Domain Name Registry"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I'm a little bit disappointed that the TLD is .PIRATE instead of .YARR</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2015 09:48:40 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9302599</link><dc:creator>attilagyorffy</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9302599</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9302599</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[Bringing npm functionality to the Ruby ecosystem]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://github.com/npm-ruby/npm-ruby">https://github.com/npm-ruby/npm-ruby</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9302596">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9302596</a></p>
<p>Points: 1</p>
<p># Comments: 0</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2015 09:47:48 +0000</pubDate><link>https://github.com/npm-ruby/npm-ruby</link><dc:creator>attilagyorffy</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9302596</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9302596</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by attilagyorffy in "List of April Fools' Day Announcements"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p><a href="https://github.com/npm-ruby/npm-ruby" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/npm-ruby/npm-ruby</a> - Bringing npm functionality to Ruby applications</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2015 08:58:23 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9302453</link><dc:creator>attilagyorffy</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9302453</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9302453</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by attilagyorffy in "Npm install could be dangerous"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>That's also a good solution I think. One of the main advantages of using containers though is real portability. This means <i>in theory</i> you could just push your container in development into production without too much hassle and making administrators nervous :) That's not the same level of portability a full VM would give you.<p>Admittedly this is more of a discussion about containers and security than npm itself but I'm interested in discovering the options out there. I may attempt to move all my stuff to containers for a bit and write about my findings.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2015 11:23:04 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8965488</link><dc:creator>attilagyorffy</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8965488</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8965488</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by attilagyorffy in "Npm install could be dangerous"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>This is exactly why i think modern kernel level security layers, such as FreeBSD jails (or Docker/LXC) were born. Provided your app runs within a jail, it wouldn't matter much anymore:<p>> Once inside the jail, a process is not permitted to escape outside of this subtree<p>You could also develop within isolation, therefore your development env would be safer and even similar to a production environment. Needless to say, that has additional benefits.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2015 16:24:30 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8947808</link><dc:creator>attilagyorffy</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8947808</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8947808</guid></item></channel></rss>