<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: autkuc</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=autkuc</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2026 12:27:06 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=autkuc" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by autkuc in "Binance-hacker-1029 – $5.6B stolen from Binance"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Wouldn't be sensible to hack Binance, there will be a much bigger payday when cryptography ends.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2026 23:13:57 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50297587</link><dc:creator>autkuc</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50297587</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50297587</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by autkuc in "Nix wrote half of my debugger"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I was just reading Michael Lynch's posts about Sia[0] and I came across this.<p>Its a very curious project, but don't you end up pinning repligraph usability on model weights? Since you take indeterminism out of the equation, a repligraph's notability is as significant as the producing model's weights, and since there is no dice rolls to be made, the eyeball problem:<p>> Our blind spots, while not perfectly correlated, have substantial overlap<p>is entirely replicated. Models that are diffused from one another can have the same blind spots, the same loose statistical reality that exists with humans. This is partially addressed in steering:<p>> A repligraph proves that a model generated some artifact. It does not prove that the model did a good job, or that the artifact is safe.<p>but I think the "Peer Review" solution is inadequate, and with some jailbreaking prompts' innocuous looks considered, "the attacker just needs to find one prompt" might be much easier than it appears.<p>Batching seems to be a huge economic turn off for proprietary model determinism, but I think its entirely viable for consumer models. Trustless evals are brilliant and should've been our reality. Nice project, good luck on your endeavor.<p>[0]: <a href="https://mtlynch.io/tags/sia/" rel="nofollow">https://mtlynch.io/tags/sia/</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2026 23:51:44 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50038307</link><dc:creator>autkuc</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50038307</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50038307</guid></item></channel></rss>